n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to versions 2.10.1, 2.9.3, and 1.123.22, an authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows could use the Python Code node to escape the sandbox. The sandbox did not sufficiently restrict access to certain built-in Python objects, allowing an attacker to exfiltrate file contents or achieve RCE. On instances using internal Task Runners (default runner mode), this could result in full compromise of the n8n host. On instances using external Task Runners, the attacker might gain access to or impact other task executed on the Task Runner. Task Runners must be enabled using N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED=true. The issue has been fixed in n8n versions 2.10.1, 2.9.3, and 1.123.22. Users should upgrade to this version or later to remediate the vulnerability. If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations. Limit workflow creation and editing permissions to fully trusted users only., and/or disable the Code node by adding n8n-nodes-base.code to the NODES_EXCLUDE environment variable. These workarounds do not fully remediate the risk and should only be used as short-term mitigation measures.
CVE-2026-27494
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.9 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 9.9
- EG Score
- 9.9(low)
- EG Risk
- 49(Track)EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity99% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 28%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
February 25, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Jul 27, 2026Python Code Node Sandbox Escape · Advisory · n8n-io/n8n · GitHub
https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/security/advisories/GHSA-mmgg-m5j7-f83h[email protected]
Patch available: n8n-io/n8n [email protected]
https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/releases/tag/[email protected][email protected]
Patch available: n8n-io/n8n [email protected] (pre-release)
https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/releases/tag/[email protected][email protected]
Patch available: n8n-io/n8n [email protected]
https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/releases/tag/[email protected]Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 2× in last 7d / 2× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-27 14:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-27 13:57 UTCOSV refresh
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-27494?
When was CVE-2026-27494 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-27494 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-27494?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-27494?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-27494
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-27494?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.