Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. Starting with Wasmtime 39.0.0, the component-model-async feature became the default, which brought with it a new implementation of [Typed]Func::call_async which made it capable of calling async-typed guest export functions. However, that implementation had a bug leading to a panic under certain circumstances: First, the host embedding calls [Typed]Func::call_async on a function exported by a component, polling the returned Future once. Second, the component function yields control to the async runtime (e.g. Tokio), e.g. due to a call to host function registered using LinkerInstance::func_wrap_async which yields, or due an epoch interruption. Third, the host embedding drops the Future after polling it once. This leaves the component instance in a non-reenterable state since the call never had a chance to complete. Fourth, the host embedding calls [Typed]Func::call_async again, polling the returned Future. Since the component instance cannot be entered at this point, the call traps, but not before allocating a task and thread for the call. Fifth, the host embedding ignores the trap and drops the Future. This panics due to the runtime attempting to dispose of the task created above, which panics since the thread has not yet exited. When a host embedder using the affected versions of Wasmtime calls wasmtime::component::[Typed]Func::call_async on a guest export and then drops the returned future without waiting for it to resolve, and then does so again with the same component instance, Wasmtime will panic. Embeddings that have the component-model-async compile-time feature disabled are unaffected. Wasmtime 40.0.4 and 41.0.4 have been patched to fix this issue. Versions 42.0.0 and later are not affected. If an embedding is not actually using any component-model-async features then disabling the component-model-async Cargo feature can work around this issue. This issue can also be worked around by either ensuring every call_async future is awaited until it completes or refraining from using the Store again after dropping a not-yet-resolved call_async future.
CVE-2026-27195
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(low)
- EG Risk
- 38(Track)EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 29%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
February 24, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
References (6)
- security-advisories@githubhttps://bytecodealliance.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/206238-general/topic/.E2.9C.94.20Panic.20in.20Wasmtime.2041.2E0.2E3.20.28runtime.2Fconcurrent.2Fcomponent.29/with/574438798
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/commit/9e51c0d9a240a9613d279c061f82286bd11383fd
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/commit/d86b00736b9ece60b3c81e52f7a7e4cdd9f7d895
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/releases/tag/v40.0.4
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/releases/tag/v41.0.4
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-xjhv-v822-pf94
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 1× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-27 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-755
- CVE-2009-5043EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-17195EG 9.8EPSS p95CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-14431EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-12815EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-19991EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-2877EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-5638EG 9.8 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-0155NVD 8.6EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-14287EG 8.9EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2019-14378EG 8.8EPSS p97HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-27195?
When was CVE-2026-27195 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-27195 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-27195?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-27195?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-27195
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-27195?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.