CVE-2026-18747

MEDIUMNVD 6.16.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (15th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2026-88575 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorNo release containing the referenced fix is confirmed: check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 6.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).

The MCUmgr SMP-over-console transport decodes a base64 frame, reads a 16-bit packet length from it, verifies a CRC and then unconditionally strips the trailing CRC with rx_ctxt->nb->len -= 2U; in mcumgr_serial_process_frag() (subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/transport/src/serial_util.c). mcumgr_serial_extract_len() accepted any declared length, including 0 and 1, and a packet declaring length 0 passes the checksum test for free because crc16_itu_t() over zero bytes returns the zero seed. Since net_buf::len is a uint16_t, the subtraction underflows and the buffer is handed to SMP claiming roughly 65 KB of payload while its data area is only CONFIG_MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_NETBUF_SIZE bytes (default 384).

The trigger is a single unauthenticated 7-byte line on the management console — the 0x06 0x09 packet marker followed by the base64 group AAA= and a newline — delivered to any transport built on this helper: CONFIG_MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_UART (smp_uart.c) or CONFIG_MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_SHELL (smp_shell.c), both of which select MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_SERIAL_HAS_SMP_OVER_CONSOLE. No prior session state, fragmentation or credentials are required to trigger the underflow, and the malformed frame is mishandled before any command handler or command-level access control runs. The attacker only needs write access to that console, which on many boards is a USB CDC-ACM port rather than a bare UART header.

With the inflated length, smp_process_request_packet() in subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/smp/src/smp.c loses its bound: cbor_nb_reader_init() gives the CBOR decoder a ~65 KB window into a 384-byte buffer, and each request header's nh_len is checked only against the inflated length. On its own the 7-byte frame re-parses whatever stale bytes the reused pool buffer still holds, typically a replay of the previously received request followed by a parse error, without leaving the buffer. Because the transport is unauthenticated, though, the attacker also controls the frames sent before the trigger, and can stage buffer contents so that a request succeeds with an nh_len larger than the buffer; net_buf_pull(), guarded only by __ASSERT_NO_MSG, then moves the parse cursor out of bounds and the loop reads further headers and CBOR from adjacent memory. The consequence is an out-of-bounds read that can fault the MCUmgr thread (denial of service); memory disclosure is also possible, since the default-enabled os echo handler (CONFIG_MCUMGR_GRP_OS_ECHO) decodes its string inside that window and copies it into its response. There is no integrity gain beyond what the unauthenticated transport already permits.

The fix rejects any declared packet length of two bytes or fewer in mcumgr_serial_extract_len(), so the CRC-strip subtraction can no longer underflow. The identical pattern remains in the test-only loopback transport subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/transport/src/smp_dummy.c (CONFIG_MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_DUMMY), which has no external input path and therefore carries no practical exposure.

CVSS v3
6.1
EG Score
6.1MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
27
EG Risk 27/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity61% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
15th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.1 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 28, 2026

Last Modified

November 6, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 28, 2026
Fix referenced — no release confirmed yet. Sources: github_commit, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Integer underflow of net_buf length in the MCUmgr serial (SMP over console) transport leads to out-of-bounds read · Advisory · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr · GitHub

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-g6cx-xj75-hvfw
GitHub commit

commit f7fc3e779a59 (zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr)

Fix landed in zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr commit f7fc3e779a59 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/f7fc3e779a59c68c96eaf63a6b03ac7489f5e4a5

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  4. 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  5. 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  6. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  7. 2026-11-06 18:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored▼ 0.70
  8. 2026-11-06 18:26 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 6.1
  9. 2026-11-06 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  10. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  11. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 05:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-04 05:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-03 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  15. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  16. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  17. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-31 06:55 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  20. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  21. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  22. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  23. 2026-10-25 14:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  25. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
Show 39 more
  1. 2026-10-23 05:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  4. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  5. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  6. 2026-10-18 03:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  8. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  9. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  10. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  11. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-11 20:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-11 17:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-11 14:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-10 21:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-09 20:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  20. 2026-10-08 19:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  22. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  23. 2026-10-06 17:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  25. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  26. 2026-10-05 17:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  28. 2026-10-03 16:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-02 15:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  31. 2026-10-01 15:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  33. 2026-09-30 14:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-09-30 13:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-09-29 22:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  37. 2026-09-29 00:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-09-28 23:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 6.8 MEDIUM
  39. 2026-09-28 23:31 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-18747?
CVE-2026-18747 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 28, 2026. The MCUmgr SMP-over-console transport decodes a base64 frame, reads a 16-bit packet length from it, verifies a CRC and then unconditionally strips the trailing CRC with rx_ctxt->nb->len -= 2U; in mcumgr_serial_process_frag() (subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/transport/src/serial_util.c).…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-18747 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-18747 was published on September 28, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 6, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-18747 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-18747 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (15th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-18747?
CVE-2026-18747 has a CVSS v3 base score of 6.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-18747?
A fix for CVE-2026-18747 is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but EchelonGraph has no release containing it on record. Check that reference and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains the fix and update to it; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-18747

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-18747?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.