systemd-homed contains a local privilege escalation bug via arbitrary system group addition to a local, logged in, homed-managed user
CVE-2026-16742
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.1%, top 100% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.7
- EG Score
- 6.7(medium)
- EG Risk
- 30(Track)EG Risk 30/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity67% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 0%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 10, 2026
Last Modified
September 1, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Aug 10, 2026systemd-homed: local privilege escalation via missing home-record signature verification on the authenticate path · Advisory · systemd/systemd · GitHub
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/security/advisories/GHSA-jm29-p7hh-vjhvPatch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | udev (259.5-0ubuntu3.4) @ resolute | 2026-09-19 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| systemd | 252.11-1 ... 262~rc1-2 (185 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| systemd | 257.13-1~deb13u1 ... 262~rc1-2 (37 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| systemd | 257.13-1~deb13u1 ... 261~rc4-1 (34 versions) | 261.2-1 | — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(1)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-19 00:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 01:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 01:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 01:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 02:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 02:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 02:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 03:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 03:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 03:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 04:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 05:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 05:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 17:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 01:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 01:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 01:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-03 02:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 21:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 15:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-31 09:57 UTCVendor advisory
Show 34 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-30 10:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-29 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 11:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 07:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 06:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 06:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 06:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 06:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 07:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 08:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-22 08:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 09:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 10:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 10:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 10:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-18 11:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 11:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 12:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 13:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 13:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 14:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 15:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 15:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 16:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 16:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 16:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 16:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 13:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 13:36 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-16742?
When was CVE-2026-16742 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-16742 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-16742?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-16742?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-16742
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-16742?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.