CVE-2026-1546

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (31st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory CVSS 6.3 is lower than this score; a lower GitHub score revises it only when its advisory is newer than the CVE record's last change, and this advisory (published 2026-01-29) is not newer than that change (2026-06-17), so it does not.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-4847 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix is confirmed yet: check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

The CVE record's description, written by its CNA (VulDB), states the affected versions: "A security vulnerability has been detected in jishenghua jshERP up to 3.6." No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

A security vulnerability has been detected in jishenghua jshERP up to 3.6. The impacted element is the function getBillItemByParam of the file /jshERP-boot/depotItem/importItemExcel of the component com.jsh.erp.datasource.mappers.DepotItemMapperEx. The manipulation of the argument barCodes leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
31st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

January 28, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Nov 1, 2026
No fix on record yet.
Web page

There is an SQL injection vulnerability in the application · Issue #145 · jishenghua/jshERP · GitHub

https://github.com/jishenghua/jshERP/issues/145#issue-3816930151
Web page

There is an SQL injection vulnerability in the application · Issue #145 · jishenghua/jshERP · GitHub

https://github.com/jishenghua/jshERP/issues/145
Web page

GitHub - jishenghua/jshERP: 管伊佳ERP(原名华夏ERP)基于SpringBoot框架和SaaS模式,立志为中小企业提供开源好用的ERP软件,目前专注进销存+财务功能。主要模块有零售管理、采购管理、销售管理、仓库管理、财务管理、报表查询、系统管理等。支持预付款、收入支出、仓库调拨、组装拆卸、订单等特色功能。拥有库存状况、出入库统计等报表。同时对角色和权限进行了细致全面控制...

GitHub - jishenghua/jshERP: 管伊佳ERP(原名华夏ERP)基于SpringBoot框架和SaaS模式,立志为中小企业提供开源好用的ERP软件,目前专注进销存+财务功能。主要模块有零售管理、采购管理、销售管理、仓库管理、财务管理、报表查询、系统管理等。支持预付款、收入支出、仓库调拨、组装拆卸、订单等特色功能。拥有库存状况、出入库统计等报表。同时对角色和权限进行了细致全面控制,精确到每个按钮和菜单。 · GitHub

https://github.com/jishenghua/jshERP/

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 60× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 301 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 201 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 12:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 12:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  3. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 11:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 11:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  6. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  7. 2026-11-11 10:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-11 10:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  9. 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  10. 2026-11-10 09:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-10 09:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  12. 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  13. 2026-11-09 09:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-09 09:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  15. 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  16. 2026-11-08 08:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-08 08:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  18. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  19. 2026-11-07 07:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-07 07:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  21. 2026-11-06 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  22. 2026-11-06 06:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-06 06:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  24. 2026-11-06 00:55 UTCOSV refresh
  25. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 05:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-05 05:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  3. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  4. 2026-11-04 04:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-04 04:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  6. 2026-11-03 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  7. 2026-11-03 03:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-03 03:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  9. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  10. 2026-11-02 02:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-02 02:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  12. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  13. 2026-11-01 01:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-01 01:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  15. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  16. 2026-10-31 00:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-31 00:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  18. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  19. 2026-10-29 23:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-29 23:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  21. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 22:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-28 22:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  24. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  25. 2026-10-27 22:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-27 22:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  27. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  28. 2026-10-26 21:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-26 21:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  30. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  31. 2026-10-25 18:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-25 18:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  33. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  34. 2026-10-25 14:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-24 16:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-24 16:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  37. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  38. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  39. 2026-10-23 15:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-23 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  41. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  42. 2026-10-22 15:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-22 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  44. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  45. 2026-10-21 14:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-21 14:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  47. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  48. 2026-10-20 13:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-20 13:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  50. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  51. 2026-10-19 12:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-19 12:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  53. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  54. 2026-10-18 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  55. 2026-10-18 05:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  57. 2026-10-17 08:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-17 08:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  59. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  60. 2026-10-16 07:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-16 07:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  62. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  63. 2026-10-15 07:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-15 07:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  65. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  66. 2026-10-14 02:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-14 02:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  68. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  69. 2026-10-12 22:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-12 22:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  71. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  72. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-12 09:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq4p-g9pm-3c37 · GitHub CVSS 6.3
  74. 2026-10-11 20:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-11 17:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-1546?
CVE-2026-1546 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 28, 2026. A security vulnerability has been detected in jishenghua jshERP up to 3.6. The impacted element is the function getBillItemByParam of the file /jshERP-boot/depotItem/importItemExcel of the component com.jsh.erp.datasource.mappers.DepotItemMapperEx. The manipulation of the argument barCodes leads to…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-1546 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-1546 was published on January 28, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-1546 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-1546 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (31st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-1546?
CVE-2026-1546 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-1546?
No fix for CVE-2026-1546 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The CVE record's description, written by its CNA (VulDB), states the affected versions: "A security vulnerability has been detected in jishenghua jshERP up to 3.6." No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-1546

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-1546?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.