CVE-2026-126078

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.16.1
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 6.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-11-12. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-122927 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-v6rj-xm57-3p59 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 6.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Action View is a framework for handling view template lookup and rendering and provides view helpers for building HTML. Prior to 8.1.4.1 and 8.0.5.2, ActionView::Helpers::TextHelper#highlight substitutes each matched phrase into the :highlighter string without escaping it and returns the result marked HTML-safe. Because sanitizing leaves quote characters in text unescaped, a match substituted into a quoted attribute value of the highlighter, such as the form shown in the method's documentation, could end the attribute value and add attributes to the element, possibly leading to XSS. Applications are affected when they pass a :highlighter that places a placeholder inside an attribute value and highlight text or phrases that a user controls. The default \1 highlighter and the block form are not affected. This issue is fixed in versions 8.1.4.1 and 8.0.5.2.

CVSS v3
6.1
EG Score
6.1MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
28
EG Risk 28/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity61% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
27th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.1 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 10, 2026

Last Modified

November 12, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Nov 12, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Possible XSS vulnerability in Action View highlight helper · Advisory · rails/rails · GitHub

https://github.com/rails/rails/security/advisories/GHSA-v6rj-xm57-3p59
GitHub release Patch Available

8.1.4.1

Patch available: rails/rails v8.1.4.1

https://github.com/rails/rails/releases/tag/v8.1.4.1
GitHub release Patch Available

8.0.5.2

Patch available: rails/rails v8.0.5.2

https://github.com/rails/rails/releases/tag/v8.0.5.2
GitHub commit

commit c796f6198837 (rails/rails)

Fix landed in rails/rails commit c796f6198837 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/c796f6198837479ada13290eb8fa767b5219a58a
GitHub commit

commit 06938194b4fd (rails/rails)

Fix landed in rails/rails commit 06938194b4fd — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/06938194b4fd59e1d2c8ab4a781f3c1e2b763425

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-126078(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
rubygemsactionview @ 8.1.4.1 (fixes >= 8.1.0.beta1, < 8.1.4.1)—ghsa
rubygemsactionview @ 8.0.5.2 (fixes < 8.0.5.2)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 5× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-12 23:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 23:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v6rj-xm57-3p59 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  3. 2026-11-12 18:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-12 18:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  6. 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 22:00 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-122927 · Source: ENISA EUVD
  8. 2026-11-10 21:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-10 21:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 6.1 MEDIUM
  10. 2026-11-10 21:04 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-126078?
CVE-2026-126078 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 10, 2026. Action View is a framework for handling view template lookup and rendering and provides view helpers for building HTML. Prior to 8.1.4.1 and 8.0.5.2, ActionView::Helpers::TextHelper#highlight substitutes each matched phrase into the :highlighter string without escaping it and returns the result…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-126078 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-126078 was published on November 10, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-126078 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-126078 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (27th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-126078?
CVE-2026-126078 has a CVSS base score of 6.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-126078?
A fix for CVE-2026-126078 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-126078 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-126078

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-126078?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.