A weakness in the BSON library's handling of a specialized binary vector data type allows an arithmetic wraparound when computing the number of elements described by an oversized attacker-supplied value. On builds where the platform word size is 32 bits, an application that parses untrusted BSON data can be made to process only a small fraction of the supplied elements while the operation reports success, producing results that disagree with byte-oriented accessors and with 64-bit builds of the same library. No authentication or user interaction is required beyond getting the application to parse the data. The impact is limited to data integrity; memory safety is not affected and no information is disclosed.
CVE-2026-120954
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This low-severity CVE scores 3.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (14th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-116140 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 3.7
- EG Score
- 3.7LOWmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 17EG Risk 17/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity37% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 3.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 14th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (3.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 3.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 3.7 LOWCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-10). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
November 3, 2026
Last Modified
November 3, 2026
References (1)
- cna@mongodbhttps://jira.mongodb.org/browse/CDRIVER-6420
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| mongo-c-driver | 1.30.4-1 ... 2.5.7-1 (22 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 12× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.
- 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-11-11 08:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-11-06 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-11-03 20:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-03 20:03 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-116140 · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-11-03 19:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-03 19:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-03 18:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 3.7 LOW
- 2026-11-03 18:51 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:14:mongo-c-driver
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-120954?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-120954 published?
Is CVE-2026-120954 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-120954?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-120954?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-120954
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-120954?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.