CVE-2026-120318

HIGHPre-NVD 7.27.2
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.2 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-11-02. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.2; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-115233 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-f29w-gfrq-r578 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo release containing the referenced fix is confirmed: check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 7.2Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).

Product Gallery Slider & Additional Variation Images for WooCommerce 2.3.23 before 2.3.26 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in Codestar backup AJAX actions csf-export, csf-import and csf-reset. Shop Managers can read the csf_backup_nonce from the settings page and supply arbitrary option names via the 'unique' parameter to read, overwrite or delete WordPress options, including modifying wp_user_roles to escalate to administrator.

CVSS v3
7.2
EG Score
7.2HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
48
EG Risk 48/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity72% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
36th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.2): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.2 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.2 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-10). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 2, 2026

Last Modified

November 2, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-120318(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 20× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 03:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 03:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f29w-gfrq-r578 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  6. 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  7. 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  8. 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  9. 2026-11-07 17:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-07 17:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f29w-gfrq-r578 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  11. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  12. 2026-11-07 16:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-07 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f29w-gfrq-r578 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  14. 2026-11-06 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  15. 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  16. 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  17. 2026-11-03 20:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-03 20:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f29w-gfrq-r578 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  19. 2026-11-03 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  20. 2026-11-02 19:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f29w-gfrq-r578 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  21. 2026-11-02 18:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-02 18:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f29w-gfrq-r578 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  23. 2026-11-02 17:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-02 17:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f29w-gfrq-r578 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
  25. 2026-11-02 16:03 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-115233 · Source: ENISA EUVD
Show 3 more
  1. 2026-11-02 15:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-02 14:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 7.2 HIGH
  3. 2026-11-02 14:32 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). No release with the fix is confirmed, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is applied.

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-120318?
CVE-2026-120318 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 2, 2026. Product Gallery Slider & Additional Variation Images for WooCommerce 2.3.23 before 2.3.26 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in Codestar backup AJAX actions csf-export, csf-import and csf-reset. Shop Managers can read the csf_backup_nonce from the settings page and supply arbitrary…
When was CVE-2026-120318 made public?
CVE-2026-120318 was made public on October 31, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on November 2, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 2, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-120318 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-120318 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (36th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-120318?
CVE-2026-120318 has a CVSS base score of 7.2 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-120318?
A fix for CVE-2026-120318 is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but EchelonGraph has no release containing it on record. Check that reference and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains the fix and update to it; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-120318 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-120318

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-120318?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.