A Beta9 tenant can attach a volume when deploying a function, endpoint, or task queue. The gateway builds the host path by joining the shared volumes root, the workspace name, and the volume identifier from the stub configuration. Nothing checks that the identifier names a volume that workspace owns. Parent-directory segments in the identifier collapse the joined path to the worker's filesystem root, and the worker bind-mounts that path into the sandbox read-write unless the volume was explicitly marked read-only. A tenant with a workspace token can therefore read and write the worker's files, including other tenants' volumes stored on that machine. Confirmed against gateway 0.1.769 and worker 0.1.745. Fixed in gateway 0.1.776 and worker 0.1.756: volume identifiers and mount paths are validated before a mount is built, including for stubs saved before the check existed, and the gateway rejects a volume that does not exist or is not owned by the workspace.
CVE-2026-120308
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 9.9 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-11-01. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.9; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-114842 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-92w2-g272-fr77 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (JFrog) states them: "Upgrade the gateway to 0.1.776 or later and the worker to 0.1.756 or later."
- CVSS v3
- 9.9
- EG Score
- 9.9CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 45EG Risk 45/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity99% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.5% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 45th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.9 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
November 1, 2026
Last Modified
November 2, 2026
Advisory Details (7)
Auto-updated Nov 2, 2026Worker: 0.1.756
Patch available: beam-cloud/beta9 worker-0.1.756
https://github.com/beam-cloud/beta9/releases/tag/worker-0.1.756Worker: 0.1.745
Patch available: beam-cloud/beta9 worker-0.1.745
https://github.com/beam-cloud/beta9/releases/tag/worker-0.1.745Gateway: 0.1.776
Patch available: beam-cloud/beta9 gateway-0.1.776
https://github.com/beam-cloud/beta9/releases/tag/gateway-0.1.776Gateway: 0.1.769
Patch available: beam-cloud/beta9 gateway-0.1.769
https://github.com/beam-cloud/beta9/releases/tag/gateway-0.1.769Handle sandbox edge cases
Patch available: beam-cloud/beta9 worker-0.1.806 (PR #1897 merged 2026-09-15)
https://github.com/beam-cloud/beta9/pull/1897commit a28bf12cf000 (beam-cloud/beta9)
Patch available: beam-cloud/beta9 worker-0.1.806 (contains commit a28bf12cf000)
https://github.com/beam-cloud/beta9/commit/a28bf12cf0007c792a25d8ed282b4e8bf6f30393GitHub - beam-cloud/beta9: Ultrafast serverless GPU inference, sandboxes, and background jobs · GitHub
https://github.com/beam-cloud/beta9Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-120308(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 27× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.
- 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-11-12 12:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-12 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-92w2-g272-fr77 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-11-11 11:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-11 11:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-92w2-g272-fr77 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-11-10 09:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-10 09:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-92w2-g272-fr77 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-11-09 07:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-09 07:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-92w2-g272-fr77 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-11-08 05:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-08 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-92w2-g272-fr77 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-11-07 03:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-07 03:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-92w2-g272-fr77 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-11-06 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-11-06 02:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-06 02:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-92w2-g272-fr77 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-11-05 23:55 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-11-05 00:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-05 00:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-92w2-g272-fr77 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
Show 17 moreShow fewer
- 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-11-03 22:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-03 22:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-92w2-g272-fr77 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-11-03 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-11-02 20:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-02 20:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-92w2-g272-fr77 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-11-02 19:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-02 19:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-92w2-g272-fr77 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-11-02 19:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-02 19:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-92w2-g272-fr77 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-11-02 15:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-02 15:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-92w2-g272-fr77 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-11-01 14:02 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-114842 · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-11-01 13:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-01 13:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 9.9 CRITICAL
- 2026-11-01 13:01 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-120308?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-120308 published?
Is CVE-2026-120308 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-120308?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-120308?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-120308
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-120308?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.