CVE-2026-118460

HIGHPre-NVD 8.08.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 8.0 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (16th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-120022 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-38qv-wpc5-5q7v (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix is confirmed yet: check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 8.0Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

The CVE record's CNA (EU Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA)) lists CompuGroup Medical Infantia versions up to and including 6.09.1 and up to and including 5.1.1; CompuGroup Medical Profim versions up to and including 6.09.1 and up to and including 5.1.1; CompuGroup Medical Venere versions up to and including 6.09.1 and up to and including 5.1.1 as affected, and 1 more product. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

Embedded private keys protected by a shared password can be used to sign practitioner assertions for arbitrary practitioner identifiers, enabling unauthorized practitioner token requests.

CVSS
8.0
EG Score
8.0HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
51
EG Risk 51/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity80% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
16th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.0 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 9, 2026

Last Modified

November 12, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Nov 9, 2026
No fix on record yet.
Web page

Rilevate vulnerabilità in prodotti CompuGroup Medical - ACN

https://www.acn.gov.it/portale/w/rilevate-vulnerabilita-in-prodotti-compugroup-medical
Web page

Più sicurezza per farmacie, studi medici e pazienti: CGM Italia risolve potenziali vulnerabilità software insieme a CSIRT Italia | CGM

https://www.cgm.com/ita_it/magazine/articles/comunicati-stampa/piu-sicurezza-per-farmacie-studi-medici-e-pazienti-cgm-italia-risolve-potenziali-vulnerabilita-software-insieme-a-csirt-italia.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-118460(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 11× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 20:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-38qv-wpc5-5q7v · GitHub severity HIGH
  3. 2026-11-12 17:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-12 17:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-38qv-wpc5-5q7v · GitHub severity HIGH
  5. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  6. 2026-11-12 16:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-12 16:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-38qv-wpc5-5q7v · GitHub severity HIGH
  8. 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  9. 2026-11-11 03:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-11 03:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-38qv-wpc5-5q7v · GitHub severity HIGH
  11. 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  12. 2026-11-09 13:10 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-120022 · Source: ENISA EUVD
  13. 2026-11-09 12:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-38qv-wpc5-5q7v · GitHub severity HIGH
  14. 2026-11-09 12:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-09 11:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 8.0 HIGH
  16. 2026-11-09 11:55 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-118460?
CVE-2026-118460 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 9, 2026. Embedded private keys protected by a shared password can be used to sign practitioner assertions for arbitrary practitioner identifiers, enabling unauthorized practitioner token requests.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-118460 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-118460 was published on November 9, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-118460 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-118460 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (16th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-118460?
CVE-2026-118460 has a CVSS base score of 8.0 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-118460?
No fix for CVE-2026-118460 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The CVE record's CNA (EU Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA)) lists CompuGroup Medical Infantia versions up to and including 6.09.1 and up to and including 5.1.1; CompuGroup Medical Profim versions up to and including 6.09.1 and up to and including 5.1.1; CompuGroup Medical Venere versions up to and including 6.09.1 and up to and including 5.1.1 as affected, and 1 more product. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-118460 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-118460

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-118460?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.