Tabularis before 0.28.0 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in its SQLite driver that allows MCP clients to execute stacked statements by supplying a crafted table_name to the describe_table tool. Attackers, including AI agents steered by untrusted content, can close the quoted PRAGMA argument and append statements to read, modify, or drop SQLite data, bypassing read-only mode and write approval.
CVE-2026-118378
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-28. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-111554 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-v867-6qx2-gwmg (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.8
- EG Score
- 7.8HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 51EG Risk 51/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity78% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 4th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-10). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 28, 2026
Last Modified
November 2, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Oct 28, 2026Tabularis before 0.28.0 SQL Injection via MCP describe_table table_name | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/tabularis-before-0.28.0-sql-injection-via-mcp-describe-table-table-nameGitHub - TabularisDB/tabularis: Open-source desktop SQL workspace with 3 built-in database drivers and 26 shipped driver plugins, including SQL Server, DuckDB, ClickHouse and Redis. Built-in MCP server for Claude, Cursor and Devin, SQL notebooks and visual EXPLAIN. · GitHub
https://github.com/TabularisDB/tabularisv0.28.0
Patch available: TabularisDB/tabularis v0.28.0
https://github.com/TabularisDB/tabularis/releases/tag/v0.28.0tabularis/src-tauri/src/drivers/sqlite/mod.rs at 804c4c3bb6fd8eaa2e36cbe49f6c0d58f373b5e9 · TabularisDB/tabularis · GitHub
https://github.com/TabularisDB/tabularis/blob/804c4c3bb6fd8eaa2e36cbe49f6c0d58f373b5e9/src-tauri/src/drivers/sqlite/mod.rs#L92-L105commit fd1bdbbae35e (TabularisDB/tabularis)
Fix landed in TabularisDB/tabularis commit fd1bdbbae35e — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/TabularisDB/tabularis/commit/fd1bdbbae35e5367c32d1e7fe9c44cb1b6875d74SQL Injection in TabularisDB/tabularis SQLite driver allows attacker-influenced MCP tool calls to bypass read-only mode via table_name · Advisory · TabularisDB/tabularis · GitHub
https://github.com/TabularisDB/tabularis/security/advisories/GHSA-xrx3-j98v-67x9Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-118378(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 24× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.
- 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-11-11 03:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-11 03:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v867-6qx2-gwmg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-11-10 07:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-10 07:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v867-6qx2-gwmg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-11-06 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-11-03 20:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-03 20:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v867-6qx2-gwmg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-11-03 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-11-02 20:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-02 20:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v867-6qx2-gwmg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-11-02 20:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-02 20:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v867-6qx2-gwmg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
Show 6 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-28 03:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-28 03:01 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-111554 · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-10-28 02:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 7.8 HIGH
- 2026-10-28 02:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-118378?
When was CVE-2026-118378 made public?
Is CVE-2026-118378 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-118378?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-118378?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-118378
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-118378?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.