When parsing an uploaded Helm chart, Gitea decompressed the archive and read every tar entry while looking for Chart.yaml without limiting the decompressed size, and did so before the package size quota was checked; the quota only considers the compressed upload size. A user with package write access to an owner, for example their own account on an instance with open registration, could repeatedly upload small, highly compressed archives that make the server spend CPU time proportional to the decompressed size, degrading the availability of the Gitea instance. The issue does not allow code execution or data access.
CVE-2026-117677
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (44th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-114800 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 29EG Risk 29/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity65% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 44th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (6.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 6.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 · CVSS v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
November 1, 2026
Last Modified
November 9, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Nov 9, 2026Helm chart upload: unbounded gzip+tar metadata parse before the package-size quota gate (CWE-409/CWE-400 decompression amplification) · Advisory · go-gitea/gitea · GitHub
Affected: 1.27.3; Arch (GHSA-9mq6),
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-r6mh-qg79-rqj2v28.3.0
Patch available: go-gitea/gitea v28.3.0
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v28.3.0fix: add missing access checks and size limits (#39942)
Fix merged in go-gitea/gitea PR #40085 on 2026-10-30 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/40085fix: add missing access checks and size limits
Fix merged in go-gitea/gitea PR #39942 on 2026-10-27 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39942Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 18× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.
- 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-11-09 17:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 6.5 MEDIUM
- 2026-11-09 17:14 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 6.5 · severity → MEDIUM
- 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-11-06 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-11-06 16:27 UTCNVD update
- 2026-11-06 16:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-06 16:02 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
- 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-11-03 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-11-01 11:02 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-114800 · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-11-01 10:26 UTCNVD update
- 2026-11-01 09:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-01 09:52 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-117677?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-117677 published?
Is CVE-2026-117677 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-117677?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-117677?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-117677
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-117677?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.