CVE-2026-116069

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.56.5
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 6.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-10-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-109383 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-m945-23c9-6845 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 6.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

NiubiGEO before 0.3.2 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to make the server fetch internal addresses by supplying a crafted domain value to POST /audit-plan. Attackers can submit IP literals, localhost, or private and link-local hosts to read loopback, internal-network, or cloud metadata responses returned in the plan's siteEvidence JSON.

CVSS v3
6.5
EG Score
6.5MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity65% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
18th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-10). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 25, 2026

Last Modified

November 4, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Oct 25, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_release, github_commit.
Web page

NiubiGEO before 0.3.2 Unauthenticated SSRF via /audit-plan domain Field | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/niubigeo-before-0.3.2-unauthenticated-ssrf-via-audit-plan-domain-field
GitHub release Patch Available

NiubiGEO v0.3.2 — SSRF security update

Patch available: Albert-Weasker/niubigeo v0.3.2

https://github.com/Albert-Weasker/niubigeo/releases/tag/v0.3.2
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 299b9e71881d (Albert-Weasker/niubigeo)

Patch available: Albert-Weasker/niubigeo v0.3.2 (contains commit 299b9e71881d)

https://github.com/Albert-Weasker/niubigeo/commit/299b9e71881d445e976012ad75ecdd05ce802715
Web page

niubigeo/src/keywords/site-evidence.ts at 25d1f06e87c73d1df98bb82a2cfebacc0c215111 · Albert-Weasker/niubigeo · GitHub

https://github.com/Albert-Weasker/niubigeo/blob/25d1f06e87c73d1df98bb82a2cfebacc0c215111/src/keywords/site-evidence.ts#L127-L149
Web page

niubigeo/src/server.ts at 25d1f06e87c73d1df98bb82a2cfebacc0c215111 · Albert-Weasker/niubigeo · GitHub

https://github.com/Albert-Weasker/niubigeo/blob/25d1f06e87c73d1df98bb82a2cfebacc0c215111/src/server.ts#L875-L894
Web page

GitHub - Albert-Weasker/niubigeo: Open-source AI brand visibility and competitor reports. Official website: https://niubigeo.ai/ | Paid services: AI testing by real people and GEO optimization. Pricing: https://niubigeo.ai/pricing · GitHub

https://github.com/Albert-Weasker/niubigeo
Web page

Unauthenticated SSRF in POST /audit-plan via domain field (response reflected) · Issue #242 · Albert-Weasker/niubigeo · GitHub

https://github.com/Albert-Weasker/niubigeo/issues/242

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-116069(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 06:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 06:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m945-23c9-6845 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  6. 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  7. 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  8. 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  9. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  10. 2026-11-06 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  11. 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 20:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-04 20:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m945-23c9-6845 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  14. 2026-11-04 19:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-04 19:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m945-23c9-6845 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  16. 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  17. 2026-11-04 01:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-04 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m945-23c9-6845 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  19. 2026-11-03 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  20. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  21. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  22. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  23. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  24. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  25. 2026-10-29 15:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 10 more
  1. 2026-10-29 15:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m945-23c9-6845 · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  2. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  3. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  4. 2026-10-26 19:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-10-26 19:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m945-23c9-6845 · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  6. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  7. 2026-10-25 14:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-10-25 12:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-25 12:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 6.5 MEDIUM
  10. 2026-10-25 11:57 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-116069?
CVE-2026-116069 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 25, 2026. NiubiGEO before 0.3.2 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to make the server fetch internal addresses by supplying a crafted domain value to POST /audit-plan. Attackers can submit IP literals, localhost, or private and link-local hosts…
When was CVE-2026-116069 made public?
CVE-2026-116069 was made public on October 23, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 25, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 4, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-116069 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-116069 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (18th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-116069?
CVE-2026-116069 has a CVSS base score of 6.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-116069?
A fix for CVE-2026-116069 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-116069 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-116069

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-116069?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.