CVE-2025-7503

CRITICALPre-NVD 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 10.0 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.7% (52nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2025-21182 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix is confirmed yet: check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 10.0Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

An OEM IP camera manufactured by Shenzhen Liandian Communication Technology LTD exposes a Telnet service (port 23) with undocumented, default credentials. The Telnet service is enabled by default and is not disclosed or configurable via the device’s web interface or user manual. An attacker with network access can authenticate using default credentials and gain root-level shell access to the device. The affected firmware version is AppFHE1_V1.0.6.0 (Kernel: KerFHE1_PTZ_WIFI_V3.1.1, Hardware: HwFHE1_WF6_PTZ_WIFI_20201218). No official fix or firmware update is available, and the vendor could not be contacted. This vulnerability allows for remote code execution and privilege escalation.

CVSS
10.0
EG Score
10.0CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
76
EG Risk 76/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
52nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 11, 2025

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Nov 6, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. No fix on record yet.
Web page🟡 PoC Available

GitHub - AounShAh/Research-on-v380-cctv-ip-camera: find Vulnerabilities related to v380 ip camera. Don't Forget to Star this repo · GitHub

https://github.com/AounShAh/Research-on-v380-cctv-ip-camera

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 62× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 291 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 191 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 06:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 06:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  4. 2026-11-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 08:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 08:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  7. 2026-11-11 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  8. 2026-11-11 10:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-11 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  10. 2026-11-10 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  11. 2026-11-10 12:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-10 12:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  13. 2026-11-09 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  14. 2026-11-09 13:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-09 13:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  16. 2026-11-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  17. 2026-11-08 15:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  18. 2026-11-07 17:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-07 17:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  20. 2026-11-07 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  21. 2026-11-06 19:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-06 19:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  23. 2026-11-06 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  24. 2026-11-05 20:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-05 20:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  2. 2026-11-04 22:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-04 22:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  4. 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  5. 2026-11-04 00:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-04 00:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  7. 2026-11-03 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  8. 2026-11-03 02:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-03 02:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  10. 2026-11-02 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  11. 2026-11-02 03:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-02 03:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  13. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  14. 2026-11-01 05:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-01 05:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  16. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-31 07:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-31 07:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  19. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-30 09:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-30 09:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  22. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-29 11:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-29 11:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  25. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  26. 2026-10-28 12:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-28 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  28. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  29. 2026-10-27 14:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-27 14:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  31. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  32. 2026-10-26 15:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  33. 2026-10-25 17:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-25 17:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  35. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  36. 2026-10-25 16:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-24 18:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-24 18:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  39. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  40. 2026-10-23 20:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-23 20:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  42. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  43. 2026-10-22 22:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-22 22:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  45. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  46. 2026-10-21 23:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-21 23:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  48. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  49. 2026-10-21 01:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-21 01:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  51. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  52. 2026-10-20 03:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-20 03:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  54. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  55. 2026-10-19 03:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-19 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  57. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  58. 2026-10-18 05:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-18 05:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  60. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  61. 2026-10-17 06:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-17 06:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  63. 2026-10-16 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  64. 2026-10-16 08:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-16 08:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  66. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  67. 2026-10-15 07:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-10-15 07:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  69. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  70. 2026-10-14 03:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-10-14 03:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  72. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  73. 2026-10-12 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jgw-f9pj-qfw2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  74. 2026-10-12 16:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-7503?
CVE-2025-7503 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 11, 2025. An OEM IP camera manufactured by Shenzhen Liandian Communication Technology LTD exposes a Telnet service (port 23) with undocumented, default credentials. The Telnet service is enabled by default and is not disclosed or configurable via the device’s web interface or user manual. An attacker with…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-7503 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-7503 was published on July 11, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-7503 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-7503 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (52nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-7503?
CVE-2025-7503 has a CVSS base score of 10.0 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-7503?
No fix for CVE-2025-7503 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch for a fix.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-7503

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-7503?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.