CVE-2025-71285

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-05-06. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2025-209675 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-7g25-3chf-ppwr (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: qrtr: Drop the MHI auto_queue feature for IPCR DL channels

MHI stack offers the 'auto_queue' feature, which allows the MHI stack to auto queue the buffers for the RX path (DL channel). Though this feature simplifies the client driver design, it introduces race between the client drivers and the MHI stack. For instance, with auto_queue, the 'dl_callback' for the DL channel may get called before the client driver is fully probed. This means, by the time the dl_callback gets called, the client driver's structures might not be initialized, leading to NULL ptr dereference.

Currently, the drivers have to workaround this issue by initializing the internal structures before calling mhi_prepare_for_transfer_autoqueue(). But even so, there is a chance that the client driver's internal code path may call the MHI queue APIs before mhi_prepare_for_transfer_autoqueue() is called, leading to similar NULL ptr dereference. This issue has been reported on the Qcom X1E80100 CRD machines affecting boot.

So to properly fix all these races, drop the MHI 'auto_queue' feature altogether and let the client driver (QRTR) manage the RX buffers manually. In the QRTR driver, queue the RX buffers based on the ring length during probe and recycle the buffers in 'dl_callback' once they are consumed. This also warrants removing the setting of 'auto_queue' flag from controller drivers.

Currently, this 'auto_queue' feature is only enabled for IPCR DL channel. So only the QRTR client driver requires the modification.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-05). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 6, 2026

Last Modified

November 5, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 2, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

net: qrtr: Drop the MHI auto_queue feature for IPCR DL channels - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8c464e00e0754e016816b1860fa9592dcad80eb2
Web page

net: qrtr: Drop the MHI auto_queue feature for IPCR DL channels - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bdff9b9b0c65ac7105416fe3a40686832515e20
Web page

net: qrtr: Drop the MHI auto_queue feature for IPCR DL channels - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/51731792a25cb312ca94cdccfa139eb46de1b2ef

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-71285(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.18.17 (fixes >=5.17.0)—osv
linuxKernel @ 6.6.160 (fixes >=5.17.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.3~rc7-1~exp1 (375 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (38 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.115-2: fixed in 6.12.115-2
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (120 versions)
  • every version up to 6.19.6-1: fixed in 6.19.6-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 279 rows on record for this CVE, as 99 entries (1 repeat merged).

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 179 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  4. 2026-11-10 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  5. 2026-11-09 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  6. 2026-11-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-11-07 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  8. 2026-11-06 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  9. 2026-11-05 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-05 22:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7g25-3chf-ppwr · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  11. 2026-11-05 21:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-05 21:28 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-05 21:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7g25-3chf-ppwr · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  14. 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  15. 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  16. 2026-11-03 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  17. 2026-11-02 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  18. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  19. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  20. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  21. 2026-10-30 13:32 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-30 13:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7g25-3chf-ppwr · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  23. 2026-10-30 12:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-30 12:31 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-30 12:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7g25-3chf-ppwr · GitHub CVSS 5.5
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-10-29 07:25 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  4. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  5. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  6. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-10-25 16:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-21 13:52 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-21 13:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7g25-3chf-ppwr · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  14. 2026-10-21 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-21 12:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7g25-3chf-ppwr · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  16. 2026-10-21 12:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-21 12:29 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-21 12:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7g25-3chf-ppwr · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  19. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 05:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  26. 2026-10-14 13:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-14 13:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7g25-3chf-ppwr · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  28. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  29. 2026-10-12 16:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  31. 2026-10-11 20:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-11 18:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-11 15:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  35. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  36. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  37. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  38. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  39. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  40. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  41. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  42. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  43. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  44. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  45. 2026-09-30 09:41 UTCOSV refresh
  46. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  47. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  48. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  49. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  50. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  51. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  52. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  53. 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  54. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  55. 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  56. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  57. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  58. 2026-09-11 16:23 UTCOSV refresh
  59. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  60. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  61. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  62. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  63. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  64. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  65. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  66. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  67. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  68. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  69. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  70. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  71. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  72. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  73. 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  74. 2026-08-23 20:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-71285?
CVE-2025-71285 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 6, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: qrtr: Drop the MHI auto_queue feature for IPCR DL channels MHI stack offers the 'auto_queue' feature, which allows the MHI stack to auto queue the buffers for the RX path (DL channel). Though this feature simplifies the client…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-71285 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-71285 was published on May 6, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-71285 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-71285 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-71285?
CVE-2025-71285 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-71285?
A fix for CVE-2025-71285 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-71285 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-71285

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-71285?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.