GNU Binutils thru 2.46 readelf contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability when processing a crafted ELF binary with malformed header fields. During relocation processing, an invalid or null section pointer may be passed into display_relocations(), resulting in a segmentation fault (SIGSEGV) and abrupt termination. No evidence of memory corruption beyond the null pointer dereference, nor any possibility of code execution, was observed.
CVE-2025-69649
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 83% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory enrichment pending alignment with NVD CVSS.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(medium)
- EG Risk
- 50(Track)EG Risk 50/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 18%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
March 6, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 2, 2026sourceware.org Git - binutils-gdb.git/commit
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=66a3492ce68e1ae45b2489bd9a815c39ea5d7f6633697 – readelf crashes with SIGSEGV on crafted input due to a null-pointer dereference
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33697Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-69649(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- CVE-2025-69649Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Medium
GNU Binutils thru 2.46 readelf contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability when processing a crafted ELF binary with malformed header fields. During relocation processing, an invalid or null section pointer may be passed into display_relocations(), resulting in a segmentation fault (SIGSEGV) and abrupt termination. No evidence of memory corruption beyond the null pointer dereference, nor any possibility of code execution, was observed.
- RHSA-2026:7098Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | binutils-main-2.45.1-5.hum1 | 2026-04-08 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| binutils | 2.35.2-2 ... 2.47-2 (213 versions) | — | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| binutils | 2.40-2 ... 2.47.50.20260901-1 (122 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| binutils | 2.44-3 ... 2.47.50.20260901-1 (48 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| binutils | 2.44-3 ... 2.45.90.20260201-1 (33 versions) | 2.46-1 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 23:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 66 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 12:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 12:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 12:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 20:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 20:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-14 08:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 08:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 08:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 23:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 23:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 23:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 22:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 22:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 22:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 05:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 05:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 05:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 08:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 08:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 20:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 20:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-09 07:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 07:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 07:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 08:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 08:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-07 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-07 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 19:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-07 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 20:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 20:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 20:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 02:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 02:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 02:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 01:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-04 01:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-02 18:40 UTCEG score recompute▲ 2.00
- 2026-08-02 18:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-02 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-27 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-27 12:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-27 12:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-69649?
When was CVE-2025-69649 disclosed?
Is CVE-2025-69649 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-69649?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-69649?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-69649
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-69649?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.