CVE-2025-64513

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.39.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.9% (59th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2025-50814 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2025-4114 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.9%CVSS: 9.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Milvus is an open-source vector database built for generative AI applications. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit a vulnerability in versions prior to 2.4.24, 2.5.21, and 2.6.5 to bypass all authentication mechanisms in the Milvus Proxy component, gaining full administrative access to the Milvus cluster. This grants the attacker the ability to read, modify, or delete data, and to perform privileged administrative operations such as database or collection management. This issue has been fixed in Milvus 2.4.24, 2.5.21, and 2.6.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, a temporary mitigation can be applied by removing the sourceID header from all incoming requests at the gateway, API gateway, or load balancer level before they reach the Milvus Proxy. This prevents attackers from exploiting the authentication bypass behavior.

CVSS
9.3
EG Score
9.3CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
57
EG Risk 57/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity93% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.9% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.9%
EPSS %ILE
59th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.3 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source
EG Likelihood
0.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 10, 2025

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Oct 8, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Critical Authentication Bypass Vulnerability in Milvus Proxy · Advisory · milvus-io/milvus · GitHub

https://github.com/milvus-io/milvus/security/advisories/GHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p
GitHub pull request

enhance: [2.4] skip check source id

Fix merged in milvus-io/milvus PR #45391 on 2025-11-07 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/milvus-io/milvus/pull/45391
GitHub pull request

enhance: [2.5] skip check source id

Fix merged in milvus-io/milvus PR #45383 on 2025-11-07 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/milvus-io/milvus/pull/45383
GitHub pull request

enhance: [2.6] skip check source id

Fix merged in milvus-io/milvus PR #45379 on 2025-11-07 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/milvus-io/milvus/pull/45379

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-64513(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
gogithub.com/milvus-io/milvus @ 0.10.3-0.20251107071934-6102f001a971 (fixes < 0.10.3-0.20251107071934-6102f001a971)—ghsa
gogithub.com/milvus-io/milvus @ 2.4.24 (fixes >= 0.10.4, < 2.4.24)—ghsa
gogithub.com/milvus-io/milvus @ 2.5.21 (fixes >= 2.5.0, < 2.5.21)—ghsa
gogithub.com/milvus-io/milvus @ 2.6.5 (fixes >= 2.6.0, < 2.6.5)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/milvus-io/milvus—
  • 0.10.4 up to 2.4.24: fixed in 2.4.24
  • 2.5.0 up to 2.5.21: fixed in 2.5.21
  • 2.6.0 up to 2.6.5: fixed in 2.6.5
  • every version up to 0.10.3-0.20251107071934-6102f001a971: fixed in 0.10.3-0.20251107071934-6102f001a971
  • 0.10.4 on: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 284 rows on record for this CVE, as 99 entries (1 repeat merged).

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 184 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 12:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  4. 2026-11-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 14:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 14:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  7. 2026-11-11 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  8. 2026-11-11 15:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  9. 2026-11-10 17:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-10 17:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  11. 2026-11-10 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  12. 2026-11-09 18:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-09 18:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  14. 2026-11-09 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  15. 2026-11-08 20:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-08 20:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  17. 2026-11-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  18. 2026-11-07 22:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-07 22:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  20. 2026-11-07 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  21. 2026-11-06 23:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-06 23:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  23. 2026-11-06 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  24. 2026-11-06 01:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-06 01:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-11-05 17:55 UTCOSV refresh
  2. 2026-11-05 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  3. 2026-11-05 02:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-05 02:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  5. 2026-11-04 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  6. 2026-11-04 04:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-04 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  8. 2026-11-03 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  9. 2026-11-03 05:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-03 05:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  11. 2026-11-02 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  12. 2026-11-02 07:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-02 07:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  14. 2026-11-01 08:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  15. 2026-11-01 08:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhjq-8c7m-3f7p · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  16. 2026-11-01 08:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  18. 2026-10-31 10:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  20. 2026-10-30 11:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  22. 2026-10-29 13:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  24. 2026-10-28 14:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  26. 2026-10-26 17:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  28. 2026-10-25 18:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  30. 2026-10-25 16:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-24 20:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  33. 2026-10-23 21:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  35. 2026-10-22 22:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  37. 2026-10-22 00:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  39. 2026-10-21 01:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  41. 2026-10-20 03:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  43. 2026-10-19 03:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  45. 2026-10-18 05:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  47. 2026-10-17 06:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-16 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  49. 2026-10-16 08:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  51. 2026-10-15 07:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  53. 2026-10-14 03:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  55. 2026-10-12 16:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  57. 2026-10-11 20:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-11 18:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-11 15:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  61. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  62. 2026-10-10 16:55 UTCOSV refresh
  63. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  64. 2026-10-08 17:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  65. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  66. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  67. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  68. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  69. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  70. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  71. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  72. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  73. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  74. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-64513?
CVE-2025-64513 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 10, 2025. Milvus is an open-source vector database built for generative AI applications. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit a vulnerability in versions prior to 2.4.24, 2.5.21, and 2.6.5 to bypass all authentication mechanisms in the Milvus Proxy component, gaining full administrative access to the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-64513 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-64513 was published on November 10, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-64513 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-64513 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.9% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (59th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-64513?
CVE-2025-64513 has a CVSS base score of 9.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-64513?
A fix for CVE-2025-64513 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-64513 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-64513

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-64513?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.