CVE-2025-47277

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2025-05-20. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2025-15950 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2026-567 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

vLLM, an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs), has an issue in versions 0.6.5 through 0.8.4 that ONLY impacts environments using the PyNcclPipe KV cache transfer integration with the V0 engine. No other configurations are affected. vLLM supports the use of the PyNcclPipe class to establish a peer-to-peer communication domain for data transmission between distributed nodes. The GPU-side KV-Cache transmission is implemented through the PyNcclCommunicator class, while CPU-side control message passing is handled via the send_obj and recv_obj methods on the CPU side.​ The intention was that this interface should only be exposed to a private network using the IP address specified by the --kv-ip CLI parameter. The vLLM documentation covers how this must be limited to a secured network. The default and intentional behavior from PyTorch is that the TCPStore interface listens on ALL interfaces, regardless of what IP address is provided. The IP address given was only used as a client-side address to use. vLLM was fixed to use a workaround to force the TCPStore instance to bind its socket to a specified private interface. As of version 0.8.5, vLLM limits the TCPStore socket to the private interface as configured.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
59
EG Risk 59/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.0% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
1.0%
EPSS %ILE
62nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
1.0% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 20, 2025

Last Modified

August 13, 2025

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 9, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_pr.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Remote Code Execution via PyNcclPipe Communication Service · Advisory · vllm-project/vllm · GitHub

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv
GitHub pull request

Use custom address for listening socket

Fix merged in vllm-project/vllm PR #15988 on 2025-04-25 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/15988
GitHub commit

commit 0d6e187e8887 (vllm-project/vllm)

Fix landed in vllm-project/vllm commit 0d6e187e8887 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/0d6e187e88874c39cda7409cf673f9e6546893e7

Patch Availability(13)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhelai1/instructlab-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-17567913652025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/bootc-gcp-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-17568152942025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/bootc-azure-amd-rhel9:1.5.3-17568152212025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/bootc-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-17567993262025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/bootc-aws-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-17568152282025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/bootc-azure-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-17568153702025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/instructlab-amd-rhel9:1.5.3-17567913912025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/instructlab-intel-rhel9:1.5.3-17579558102025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/bootc-intel-rhel9:1.5.3-17567241932025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/bootc-amd-rhel9:1.5.3-17568004372025-09-15redhat
redhatrhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:3.1.0-17515225402025-07-07redhat
redhatrhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:3.1.0-17515225442025-07-07redhat
pipvllm @ 0.8.5 (fixes >= 0.6.5, < 0.8.5)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
vllm0.6.5 ... 0.8.4 (12 versions)
  • 0.6.5 up to 0.8.5: fixed in 0.8.5
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 73× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 296 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 196 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 08:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 08:01 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-13 08:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 08:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 08:29 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-12 08:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-11 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  9. 2026-11-11 08:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-11 08:57 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-11 08:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-10 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  13. 2026-11-10 09:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-10 09:25 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-10 09:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-11-09 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  17. 2026-11-09 09:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-09 09:53 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-09 09:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-11-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  21. 2026-11-08 10:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-08 10:21 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-08 10:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-11-07 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  25. 2026-11-07 10:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-07 10:45 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-07 10:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-06 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  4. 2026-11-06 11:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-06 11:12 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-06 11:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-05 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  8. 2026-11-05 13:55 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-11-05 11:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-05 11:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-11-04 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 12:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-04 12:07 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-04 12:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-03 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  16. 2026-11-03 12:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-03 12:34 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-03 12:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-11-02 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  20. 2026-11-02 13:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-02 13:02 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-02 13:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  24. 2026-11-01 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-11-01 13:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  26. 2026-11-01 08:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-11-01 08:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  29. 2026-10-31 13:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-31 13:57 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  32. 2026-10-30 14:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-30 14:25 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  35. 2026-10-29 14:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-29 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  38. 2026-10-28 15:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-28 15:22 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  41. 2026-10-27 15:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-27 15:50 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  44. 2026-10-26 16:15 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-25 16:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-25 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  48. 2026-10-25 16:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-24 17:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-24 17:04 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  52. 2026-10-23 17:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-23 17:33 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  55. 2026-10-22 18:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-22 18:01 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  58. 2026-10-21 18:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-21 18:07 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  61. 2026-10-20 18:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-20 18:34 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  64. 2026-10-19 18:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-19 18:57 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  67. 2026-10-18 19:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-10-18 19:24 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  70. 2026-10-18 05:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-10-17 19:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-17 19:51 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  74. 2026-10-16 20:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-16 20:17 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-47277?
CVE-2025-47277 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 20, 2025. vLLM, an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs), has an issue in versions 0.6.5 through 0.8.4 that ONLY impacts environments using the PyNcclPipe KV cache transfer integration with the V0 engine. No other configurations are affected. vLLM supports the use of the PyNcclPipe…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-47277 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-47277 was published on May 20, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 13, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-47277 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-47277 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (62nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-47277?
CVE-2025-47277 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-47277?
A fix for CVE-2025-47277 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-47277 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-47277

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-47277?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.