CVE-2025-37988

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-05-20. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fix a couple of races in MNT_TREE_BENEATH handling by do_move_mount()

Normally do_lock_mount(path, _) is locking a mountpoint pinned by *path and at the time when matching unlock_mount() unlocks that location it is still pinned by the same thing.

Unfortunately, for 'beneath' case it's no longer that simple - the object being locked is not the one *path points to. It's the mountpoint of path->mnt. The thing is, without sufficient locking ->mnt_parent may change under us and none of the locks are held at that point. The rules are * mount_lock stabilizes m->mnt_parent for any mount m. * namespace_sem stabilizes m->mnt_parent, provided that m is mounted. * if either of the above holds and refcount of m is positive, we are guaranteed the same for refcount of m->mnt_parent.

namespace_sem nests inside inode_lock(), so do_lock_mount() has to take inode_lock() before grabbing namespace_sem. It does recheck that path->mnt is still mounted in the same place after getting namespace_sem, and it does take care to pin the dentry. It is needed, since otherwise we might end up with racing mount --move (or umount) happening while we were getting locks; in that case dentry would no longer be a mountpoint and could've been evicted on memory pressure along with its inode - not something you want when grabbing lock on that inode.

However, pinning a dentry is not enough - the matching mount is also pinned only by the fact that path->mnt is mounted on top it and at that point we are not holding any locks whatsoever, so the same kind of races could end up with all references to that mount gone just as we are about to enter inode_lock(). If that happens, we are left with filesystem being shut down while we are holding a dentry reference on it; results are not pretty.

What we need to do is grab both dentry and mount at the same time; that makes inode_lock() safe *and* avoids the problem with fs getting shut down under us. After taking namespace_sem we verify that path->mnt is still mounted (which stabilizes its ->mnt_parent) and check that it's still mounted at the same place. From that point on to the matching namespace_unlock() we are guaranteed that mount/dentry pair we'd grabbed are also pinned by being the mountpoint of path->mnt, so we can quietly drop both the dentry reference (as the current code does) and mnt one - it's OK to do under namespace_sem, since we are not dropping the final refs.

That solves the problem on do_lock_mount() side; unlock_mount() also has one, since dentry is guaranteed to stay pinned only until the namespace_unlock(). That's easy to fix - just have inode_unlock() done earlier, while it's still pinned by mp->m_dentry.

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7(medium)
EG Risk
26(Track)
EG Risk 26/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity47% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 20, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 5, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

fix a couple of races in MNT_TREE_BENEATH handling by do_move_mount() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d039eac6e5950f9d1ecc9e410c2fd1feaeab3b6
generic

fix a couple of races in MNT_TREE_BENEATH handling by do_move_mount() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d4b21e8cd3d7efa2deb9cff534f0133e84f35086
generic

fix a couple of races in MNT_TREE_BENEATH handling by do_move_mount() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a61afd54826ac24c2c93845c4f441dbc344875b1
generic

fix a couple of races in MNT_TREE_BENEATH handling by do_move_mount() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4f435c1f4c48ff84968e2d9159f6fa41f46cf998

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-37988(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(20)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.27-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.27-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(19)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 24× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 131 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-17 19:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-07 12:48 UTCOSV refresh
  13. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-20 22:01 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-05 13:55 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-05 13:55 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-05 13:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-30 07:09 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-07-30 07:09 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-07-30 07:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-07-24 05:11 UTCOSV refresh
  33. 2026-07-23 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-07 00:51 UTCOSV refresh
  52. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-37988?
CVE-2025-37988 is a medium vulnerability published on May 20, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fix a couple of races in MNTTREEBENEATH handling by domovemount() Normally dolockmount(path, _) is locking a mountpoint pinned by *path and at the time when matching unlock_mount() unlocks that location it is still pinned by the…
When was CVE-2025-37988 disclosed?
CVE-2025-37988 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 20, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-37988 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-37988 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-37988?
CVE-2025-37988 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-37988?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-37988, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-37988

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-37988?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.