CVE-2025-37928

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-05-20. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2025-15912 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-pq22-mrc2-gx83 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

dm-bufio: don't schedule in atomic context

A BUG was reported as below when CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP and try_verify_in_tasklet are enabled. [ 129.444685][ T934] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at drivers/md/dm-bufio.c:2421 [ 129.444723][ T934] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 934, name: kworker/1:4 [ 129.444740][ T934] preempt_count: 201, expected: 0 [ 129.444756][ T934] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 [ 129.444781][ T934] Preemption disabled at: [ 129.444789][ T934] [] shrink_work+0x21c/0x248 [ 129.445167][ T934] kernel BUG at kernel/sched/walt/walt_debug.c:16! [ 129.445183][ T934] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 129.445204][ T934] Skip md ftrace buffer dump for: 0x1609e0 [ 129.447348][ T934] CPU: 1 PID: 934 Comm: kworker/1:4 Tainted: G W OE 6.6.56-android15-8-o-g6f82312b30b9-debug #1 1400000003000000474e5500b3187743670464e8 [ 129.447362][ T934] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Parrot QRD, Alpha-M (DT) [ 129.447373][ T934] Workqueue: dm_bufio_cache shrink_work [ 129.447394][ T934] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 129.447406][ T934] pc : android_rvh_schedule_bug+0x0/0x8 [sched_walt_debug] [ 129.447435][ T934] lr : __traceiter_android_rvh_schedule_bug+0x44/0x6c [ 129.447451][ T934] sp : ffffffc0843dbc90 [ 129.447459][ T934] x29: ffffffc0843dbc90 x28: ffffffffffffffff x27: 0000000000000c8b [ 129.447479][ T934] x26: 0000000000000040 x25: ffffff804b3d6260 x24: ffffffd816232b68 [ 129.447497][ T934] x23: ffffff805171c5b4 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffffffd816231900 [ 129.447517][ T934] x20: ffffff80306ba898 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: ffffffc084159030 [ 129.447535][ T934] x17: 00000000d2b5dd1f x16: 00000000d2b5dd1f x15: ffffffd816720358 [ 129.447554][ T934] x14: 0000000000000004 x13: ffffff89ef978000 x12: 0000000000000003 [ 129.447572][ T934] x11: ffffffd817a823c4 x10: 0000000000000202 x9 : 7e779c5735de9400 [ 129.447591][ T934] x8 : ffffffd81560d004 x7 : 205b5d3938373434 x6 : ffffffd8167397c8 [ 129.447610][ T934] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : ffffffc0843db9e0 [ 129.447629][ T934] x2 : 0000000000002f15 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 129.447647][ T934] Call trace: [ 129.447655][ T934] android_rvh_schedule_bug+0x0/0x8 [sched_walt_debug 1400000003000000474e550080cce8a8a78606b6] [ 129.447681][ T934] __might_resched+0x190/0x1a8 [ 129.447694][ T934] shrink_work+0x180/0x248 [ 129.447706][ T934] process_one_work+0x260/0x624 [ 129.447718][ T934] worker_thread+0x28c/0x454 [ 129.447729][ T934] kthread+0x118/0x158 [ 129.447742][ T934] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 129.447761][ T934] Code: ???????? ???????? ???????? d2b5dd1f (d4210000) [ 129.447772][ T934] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

dm_bufio_lock will call spin_lock_bh when try_verify_in_tasklet is enabled, and __scan will be called in atomic context.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
51
EG Risk 51/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
55th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 20, 2025

Last Modified

November 5, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Sep 27, 2026
Patch available.
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 4271-1] linux-6.1 security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/08/msg00010.html
Web page

dm-bufio: don't schedule in atomic context - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f45108257280e0a1cc951ce254853721b40c0812
Web page

dm-bufio: don't schedule in atomic context - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c8c83052283bcf2fdd467a33d1d2bd5ba36e935a
Web page

dm-bufio: don't schedule in atomic context - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a99f5bf4f7197009859dbce14c12f8e2ce5a5a69
Web page

dm-bufio: don't schedule in atomic context - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a3d8f0a7f5e8b193db509c7191fefeed3533fc44
Web page

dm-bufio: don't schedule in atomic context - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69a37b3ba85088fc6b903b8e1db7f0a1d4d0b52d

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-37928(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(23)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1047.50+fips1) @ noble2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.14.0-24.24) @ plucky2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-6.14 (6.14.0-1007.7) @ noble2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-64k-6.14 (6.14.0-1009.9) @ plucky2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-64k-6.14 (6.14.0-1009.9) @ plucky2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-edge (6.14.0-1009.9~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-6.14 (6.14.0-1010.10) @ plucky2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-100.100) @ noble2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-22.04 (6.8.1-1041.42~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (6.8.0-1047.50~22.04.2) @ jammy2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-100.100+fips1) @ noble2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-100.100~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1046.52+fips1) @ noble2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gke-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1043.48) @ noble2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1046.49.1) @ noble2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1044.44) @ noble2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (6.8.0-1051.57~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1046.52) @ noble2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1043.44) @ noble2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-6.8.1 (6.8.1-1041.42) @ noble2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp (6.8.0.1023.24) @ noble2026-10-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-20.04-edge (6.8.0-100.100.1) @ noble2026-10-25ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.1.138 (fixes >=4.9.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.137-1~deb11u1 (8 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.140-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.140-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (40 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.140-1: fixed in 6.1.140-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.12.29-1: fixed in 6.12.29-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.12.29-1: fixed in 6.12.29-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(22)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 220 rows on record for this CVE, as 99 entries (1 repeat merged).

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 120 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 55th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  3. 2026-11-12 09:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-12 09:10 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-12 09:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pq22-mrc2-gx83 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  6. 2026-11-11 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  8. 2026-11-09 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  9. 2026-11-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  10. 2026-11-07 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  11. 2026-11-06 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  12. 2026-11-05 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-05 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pq22-mrc2-gx83 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  14. 2026-11-05 20:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-05 20:58 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-05 20:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pq22-mrc2-gx83 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  17. 2026-11-05 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  18. 2026-11-04 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  19. 2026-11-03 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  20. 2026-11-02 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  21. 2026-11-01 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  22. 2026-10-31 17:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-31 17:13 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-31 17:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pq22-mrc2-gx83 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  25. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  2. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  3. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  4. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  5. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  6. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  7. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-10-25 04:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-25 04:46 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-25 04:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pq22-mrc2-gx83 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  11. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  12. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  13. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  15. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  17. 2026-10-18 17:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-18 17:02 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-18 17:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pq22-mrc2-gx83 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  20. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 05:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  26. 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  27. 2026-10-12 17:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  29. 2026-10-11 20:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-11 18:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-11 15:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  33. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  34. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  35. 2026-10-08 17:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  36. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  37. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  38. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  39. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  40. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  41. 2026-10-02 13:11 UTCOSV refresh
  42. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  43. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  44. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  45. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  46. 2026-09-26 00:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  47. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  48. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  49. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  50. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  51. 2026-09-17 19:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  52. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  53. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  54. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  55. 2026-09-13 11:24 UTCOSV refresh
  56. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  57. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  58. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  59. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  60. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  61. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  62. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  63. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  64. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  65. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  66. 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  67. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  68. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  69. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  70. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  71. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  72. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  73. 2026-08-25 12:32 UTCOSV refresh
  74. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-52329
    Published Jun 15, 2025

    Parrot and DJI variants Drone OSes - Kernel Panic Exploit

    Open source ↗

Related CVEs(same vendor)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-37928?
CVE-2025-37928 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 20, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm-bufio: don't schedule in atomic context A BUG was reported as below when CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP and try_verify_in_tasklet are enabled. [ 129.444685][ T934] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-37928 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-37928 was published on May 20, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-37928 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-37928 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (55th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-37928?
CVE-2025-37928 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-37928?
A fix for CVE-2025-37928 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-37928 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-37928

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-37928?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Book a Demo →Browse All CVEs