CVE-2025-37743

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2025-05-01. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2025-13069 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-v99v-6wp3-34rf (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: ath12k: Avoid memory leak while enabling statistics

Driver uses monitor destination rings for extended statistics mode and standalone monitor mode. In extended statistics mode, TLVs are parsed from the buffer received from the monitor destination ring and assigned to the ppdu_info structure to update per-packet statistics. In standalone monitor mode, along with per-packet statistics, the packet data (payload) is captured, and the driver updates per MSDU to mac80211.

When the AP interface is enabled, only extended statistics mode is activated. As part of enabling monitor rings for collecting statistics, the driver subscribes to HAL_RX_MPDU_START TLV in the filter configuration. This TLV is received from the monitor destination ring, and kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object occurs, which is not freed, leading to a memory leak. The kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object is only required while enabling the standalone monitor interface. This causes a memory leak while enabling extended statistics mode in the driver.

Fix this memory leak by removing the kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object in the HAL_RX_MPDU_START TLV handling. Additionally, remove the standalone monitor mode handlings in the HAL_MON_BUF_ADDR and HAL_RX_MSDU_END TLVs. These TLV tags will be handled properly when enabling standalone monitor mode in the future.

Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.3.1-00173-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
15th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-05). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 1, 2025

Last Modified

November 5, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-37743(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-azure (6.14.0-1007.7) @ plucky2026-10-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.14.0-22.22) @ plucky2026-10-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-64k (6.14.0-1007.7) @ plucky2026-10-21ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.14.3 (fixes >=6.3.0)—osv
linuxKernel @ 6.6.160 (fixes >=6.3.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (38 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.115-2: fixed in 6.12.115-2
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.16~rc7-1~exp1 (66 versions)
  • every version up to 6.16.3-1: fixed in 6.16.3-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(3)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 200 rows on record for this CVE, as 98 entries (2 repeats merged).

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 100 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  4. 2026-11-10 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  5. 2026-11-09 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  6. 2026-11-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  7. 2026-11-07 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  8. 2026-11-06 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  9. 2026-11-05 21:29 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-05 21:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v99v-6wp3-34rf · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  11. 2026-11-05 20:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-05 20:48 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-05 20:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v99v-6wp3-34rf · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  14. 2026-11-05 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  15. 2026-11-04 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  16. 2026-11-03 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  17. 2026-11-02 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  18. 2026-11-01 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  19. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  20. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  21. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  22. 2026-10-29 07:55 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  24. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  25. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  3. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  4. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  5. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  6. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  7. 2026-10-21 13:53 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-21 13:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v99v-6wp3-34rf · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  9. 2026-10-21 13:01 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-21 13:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v99v-6wp3-34rf · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  11. 2026-10-21 12:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-21 12:31 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-21 12:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v99v-6wp3-34rf · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  14. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  15. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  16. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  17. 2026-10-18 05:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  19. 2026-10-16 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  20. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  21. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  22. 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  23. 2026-10-12 17:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  25. 2026-10-11 20:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-11 18:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-11 15:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  29. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  30. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  31. 2026-10-08 17:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  32. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  33. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  34. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  35. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  36. 2026-10-02 15:11 UTCOSV refresh
  37. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  38. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  39. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  40. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
  41. 2026-09-26 00:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
  42. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
  43. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  44. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  45. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  46. 2026-09-17 19:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  47. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  48. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  49. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  50. 2026-09-13 13:24 UTCOSV refresh
  51. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  52. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  53. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  54. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  55. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  56. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  57. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  58. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  59. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  60. 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  61. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  62. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  63. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  64. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  65. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  66. 2026-08-25 15:09 UTCOSV refresh
  67. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  68. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  69. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  70. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  71. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  72. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  73. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-37743?
CVE-2025-37743 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 1, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: ath12k: Avoid memory leak while enabling statistics Driver uses monitor destination rings for extended statistics mode and standalone monitor mode. In extended statistics mode, TLVs are parsed from the buffer received from…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-37743 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-37743 was published on May 1, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-37743 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-37743 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (15th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-37743?
CVE-2025-37743 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-37743?
A fix for CVE-2025-37743 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-37743 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-37743

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-37743?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.