CVE-2025-25064

CRITICALNVD 8.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2025-02-03. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8; sources differ by 1.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2025-4006 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix is confirmed yet: check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 37%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

The CVE record's description, written by its CNA (MITRE Corporation), states the affected versions: "SQL injection vulnerability in the ZimbraSync Service SOAP endpoint in Zimbra Collaboration 10.0.x before 10.0.12 and 10.1.x before 10.1.4 due to insufficient sanitization of a user-supplied parameter." No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

SQL injection vulnerability in the ZimbraSync Service SOAP endpoint in Zimbra Collaboration 10.0.x before 10.0.12 and 10.1.x before 10.1.4 due to insufficient sanitization of a user-supplied parameter. Authenticated attackers can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating a specific parameter in the request, allowing them to inject arbitrary SQL queries that could retrieve email metadata.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
75
EG Risk 75/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
37%
EPSS %ILE
98th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
37% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 3, 2025

Last Modified

June 11, 2025

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 31, 2026
No fix on record yet.
Web page

Zimbra Security Advisories - Zimbra :: Tech Center

https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories
Web page

Zimbra Releases/10.1.4 - Zimbra :: Tech Center

https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Releases/10.1.4#Security_Fixes
Web page

Zimbra Releases/10.0.12 - Zimbra :: Tech Center

https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Releases/10.0.12#Security_Fixes

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 58× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 239 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 139 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 07:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 07:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 08:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 08:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-11 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  8. 2026-11-11 09:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-11 09:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-11-10 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  11. 2026-11-10 11:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-10 11:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-11-09 12:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-09 12:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  16. 2026-11-08 14:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-08 14:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-11-07 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  19. 2026-11-07 15:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-11-06 16:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-06 16:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-11-06 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  23. 2026-11-05 18:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-05 18:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-05 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 09:55 UTCOSV refresh
  2. 2026-11-04 19:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-04 19:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-04 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  5. 2026-11-03 21:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-03 21:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-03 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  8. 2026-11-02 22:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-02 22:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-11-01 23:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-01 23:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-01 01:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-01 01:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  15. 2026-10-31 02:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-31 02:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  18. 2026-10-30 04:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-30 04:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  21. 2026-10-29 05:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-29 05:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  24. 2026-10-28 06:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-28 06:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  26. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  27. 2026-10-27 08:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-27 08:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  29. 2026-10-26 07:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  30. 2026-10-25 16:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  32. 2026-10-25 09:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-25 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  34. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  35. 2026-10-24 10:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-24 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  37. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  38. 2026-10-23 11:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-23 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  40. 2026-10-22 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  41. 2026-10-22 13:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-22 13:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  43. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  44. 2026-10-21 14:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-21 14:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  46. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  47. 2026-10-20 15:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-20 15:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  49. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  50. 2026-10-19 16:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  51. 2026-10-18 17:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-18 17:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  53. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  54. 2026-10-18 05:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-17 18:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-17 18:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  57. 2026-10-17 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  58. 2026-10-16 20:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-16 20:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  60. 2026-10-16 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  61. 2026-10-15 17:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-15 17:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  64. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  65. 2026-10-14 11:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-14 11:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  67. 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  68. 2026-10-13 10:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  69. 2026-10-12 17:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-12 11:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8hm-78qp-v45p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  71. 2026-10-11 20:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-11 18:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-11 15:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile
  75. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 37% · 98th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.

  • GitHub PoCyelang123/Zimbra10_SQL_Injection
    Published Feb 15, 2025

    Zimbra 10 SQL Injection (CVE-2025-25064) Analysis Article

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-25064?
CVE-2025-25064 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 3, 2025. SQL injection vulnerability in the ZimbraSync Service SOAP endpoint in Zimbra Collaboration 10.0.x before 10.0.12 and 10.1.x before 10.1.4 due to insufficient sanitization of a user-supplied parameter. Authenticated attackers can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating a specific parameter in…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-25064 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-25064 was published on February 3, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 11, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-25064 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-25064 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 37% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (98th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-25064?
CVE-2025-25064 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.8 (CRITICAL).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-25064?
No fix for CVE-2025-25064 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The CVE record's description, written by its CNA (MITRE Corporation), states the affected versions: "SQL injection vulnerability in the ZimbraSync Service SOAP endpoint in Zimbra Collaboration 10.0.x before 10.0.12 and 10.1.x before 10.1.4 due to insufficient sanitization of a user-supplied parameter." No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-25064

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-25064?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.