CVE-2024-47606

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.7% (77th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2024-42823 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.7%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

GStreamer is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. An integer underflow has been detected in the function qtdemux_parse_theora_extension within qtdemux.c. The vulnerability occurs due to an underflow of the gint size variable, which causes size to hold a large unintended value when cast to an unsigned integer. This 32-bit negative value is then cast to a 64-bit unsigned integer (0xfffffffffffffffa) in a subsequent call to gst_buffer_new_and_alloc. The function gst_buffer_new_allocate then attempts to allocate memory, eventually calling _sysmem_new_block. The function _sysmem_new_block adds alignment and header size to the (unsigned) size, causing the overflow of the 'slice_size' variable. As a result, only 0x89 bytes are allocated, despite the large input size. When the following memcpy call occurs in gst_buffer_fill, the data from the input file will overwrite the content of the GstMapInfo info structure. Finally, during the call to gst_memory_unmap, the overwritten memory may cause a function pointer hijack, as the mem->allocator->mem_unmap_full function is called with a corrupted pointer. This function pointer overwrite could allow an attacker to alter the execution flow of the program, leading to arbitrary code execution. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.24.10.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
45
EG Risk 45/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
1.7%
EPSS %ILE
77th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
1.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

December 12, 2024

Last Modified

November 4, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Nov 7, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 4071-1] gst-plugins-good1.0 security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/02/msg00035.html
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 3994-1] gstreamer1.0 security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/12/msg00016.html
Web page

Security Advisory 2024-0014 (GHSL-2024-166, CVE-2024-47606) | GStreamer

https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2024-0014.html
GitHub advisory

GHSL-2024-166: Integer underflow in qtdemux_parse_theora_extension leading to function pointer overwrite in GStreamer - CVE-2024-47606 | GitHub Security Lab

https://securitylab.github.com/advisories/GHSL-2024-166_Gstreamer/

Patch Availability(14)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulibgstreamer1.0-dev (1.24.8-1ubuntu0.1) @ oracular2026-11-02ubuntu
ubuntulibgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-dev (1.16.3-0ubuntu1.3) @ focal2026-11-02ubuntu
redhatpatch2025-04-16redhat
redhatpatch2025-04-16redhat
redhatgstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.10.4-3.el7_92024-12-18redhat
redhatgstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-3.el8_62024-12-18redhat
redhatgstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-4.el8_82024-12-18redhat
redhatgstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-2.el8_22024-12-18redhat
redhatgstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-3.el8_42024-12-18redhat
redhatgstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.18.4-6.el9_02024-12-17redhat
redhatgstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-5.el8_102024-12-17redhat
redhatgstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.22.1-3.el9_52024-12-16redhat
redhatgstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.22.1-3.el9_42024-12-16redhat
redhatgstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.18.4-7.el9_22024-12-16redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(13 across 9 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gst-plugins-good1.01.18.4-2, 1.18.4-2+deb11u1, 1.18.4-2+deb11u2
  • every version up to 1.18.4-2+deb11u3: fixed in 1.18.4-2+deb11u3
—
gstreamer1.01.18.4-2.1
  • every version up to 1.18.4-2.1+deb11u1: fixed in 1.18.4-2.1+deb11u1
—
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gst-plugins-good1.01.22.0-5, 1.22.0-5+deb12u1
  • every version up to 1.22.0-5+deb12u2: fixed in 1.22.0-5+deb12u2
—
gstreamer1.01.22.0-2
  • every version up to 1.22.0-2+deb12u1: fixed in 1.22.0-2+deb12u1
—
Debian:13(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gst-plugins-good1.0—
  • every version up to 1.24.10-1: fixed in 1.24.10-1
—
gstreamer1.0—
  • every version up to 1.24.10-1: fixed in 1.24.10-1
—
Debian:14(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gst-plugins-good1.0—
  • every version up to 1.24.10-1: fixed in 1.24.10-1
—
gstreamer1.0—
  • every version up to 1.24.10-1: fixed in 1.24.10-1
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gst-plugins-good—
  • every version up to 1.24.10-r0: fixed in 1.24.10-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gst-plugins-good—
  • every version up to 1.24.10-r0: fixed in 1.24.10-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gst-plugins-good—
  • every version up to 1.24.10-r0: fixed in 1.24.10-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gst-plugins-good—
  • every version up to 1.24.10-r0: fixed in 1.24.10-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gst-plugins-good—
  • every version up to 1.24.10-r0: fixed in 1.24.10-r0
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 63× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 292 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 192 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 09:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 11:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 11:22 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-11 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  8. 2026-11-11 12:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-11 12:48 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-10 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  11. 2026-11-10 14:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-10 14:13 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-09 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  14. 2026-11-09 15:39 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-08 17:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-08 17:05 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-11-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  18. 2026-11-07 18:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-07 18:30 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-07 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  21. 2026-11-06 19:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-06 19:54 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-06 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  24. 2026-11-05 21:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-05 21:20 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  2. 2026-11-05 03:25 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-11-04 22:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-04 22:46 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-04 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  6. 2026-11-04 00:11 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-03 22:27 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-03 21:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-03 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-03 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  11. 2026-11-02 22:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-02 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-02 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  14. 2026-11-02 00:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-02 00:11 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-01 01:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-01 01:37 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  19. 2026-10-31 03:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-31 03:02 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  22. 2026-10-30 04:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-30 04:28 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  25. 2026-10-29 05:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-29 05:53 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  28. 2026-10-28 07:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-28 07:18 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  31. 2026-10-27 08:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-27 08:44 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  34. 2026-10-26 08:12 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-25 17:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  37. 2026-10-25 09:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-25 09:37 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  40. 2026-10-24 11:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-24 11:02 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  43. 2026-10-23 12:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-23 12:23 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  46. 2026-10-22 13:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-22 13:49 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  49. 2026-10-21 15:13 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-20 16:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-20 16:39 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  53. 2026-10-19 17:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-19 17:55 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  56. 2026-10-18 19:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-18 19:20 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  59. 2026-10-18 06:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-17 20:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-17 20:46 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  63. 2026-10-16 22:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-16 22:09 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-16 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  66. 2026-10-15 18:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-15 18:42 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  69. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  70. 2026-10-14 12:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-10-14 12:22 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  73. 2026-10-13 12:12 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-12 17:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-47606?
CVE-2024-47606 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on December 12, 2024. GStreamer is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. An integer underflow has been detected in the function qtdemux_parse_theora_extension within qtdemux.c. The vulnerability occurs due to an underflow of the gint size variable, which causes size to hold a large unintended…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-47606 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-47606 was published on December 12, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 4, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-47606 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-47606 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (77th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-47606?
CVE-2024-47606 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-47606?
A fix for CVE-2024-47606 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-47606 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-47606

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-47606?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.