CVE-2024-28752

CRITICALNVD 9.39.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2024-03-15. NVD baseline CVSS 9.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2024-0991 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 3.1%CVSS: 9.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A SSRF vulnerability using the Aegis DataBinding in versions of Apache CXF before 4.0.4, 3.6.3 and 3.5.8 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on webservices that take at least one parameter of any type. Users of other data bindings (including the default databinding) are not impacted.

CVSS v3
9.3
EG Score
9.3CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
43
EG Risk 43/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity93% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation3.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
3.1%
EPSS %ILE
88th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.3 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
3.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

March 15, 2024

Last Modified

June 27, 2025

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

oss-security - CVE-2024-28752: Apache CXF SSRF Vulnerability using the Aegis databinding

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/14/3

Patch Availability(15)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhateap7-xalan-j2-0:2.7.1-26.redhat_00015.1.ep7.el72024-11-25redhat
redhateap7-xml-security-0:2.2.3-2.redhat_00001.1.el7eap2024-11-25redhat
redhatcxf-core2024-10-22redhat
redhateap8-apache-cxf-xjc-utils-0:4.0.0-5.redhat_00003.1.el8eap2024-08-15redhat
redhateap8-apache-cxf-xjc-utils-0:4.0.0-5.redhat_00003.1.el9eap2024-08-15redhat
redhatpatch2024-06-06redhat
redhateap7-apache-cxf-0:3.5.8-1.redhat_00001.1.el7eap2024-06-03redhat
redhatorg.apache.cxf/cxf-core:3.5.8.redhat-000012024-06-03redhat
redhateap7-xml-security-0:2.3.4-1.redhat_00002.1.el8eap2024-06-03redhat
redhateap7-xml-security-0:2.3.4-1.redhat_00002.1.el9eap2024-06-03redhat
redhatpatch2024-05-16redhat
redhatpatch2024-05-15redhat
mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-databinding-aegis @ 3.5.8 (fixes < 3.5.8)—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-databinding-aegis @ 3.6.3 (fixes >= 3.6.0, < 3.6.3)—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-databinding-aegis @ 4.0.4 (fixes >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.4)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-databinding-aegis4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3
  • every version up to 3.5.8: fixed in 3.5.8
  • 3.6.0 up to 3.6.3: fixed in 3.6.3
  • 4.0.0 up to 4.0.4: fixed in 4.0.4
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 74× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 291 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 191 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 88th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 14:38 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-12 14:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  4. 2026-11-11 16:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 16:47 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-11 16:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  7. 2026-11-11 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 88th percentile
  8. 2026-11-10 18:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-10 18:56 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-10 18:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  11. 2026-11-10 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 88th percentile
  12. 2026-11-09 21:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-09 21:05 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-09 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  15. 2026-11-09 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 88th percentile
  16. 2026-11-08 23:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-08 23:13 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-08 23:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  19. 2026-11-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  20. 2026-11-08 01:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-08 01:22 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-08 01:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  23. 2026-11-07 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  24. 2026-11-07 03:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-07 03:31 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-07 03:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  2. 2026-11-06 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  3. 2026-11-06 05:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-06 05:40 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-06 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  6. 2026-11-05 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  7. 2026-11-05 07:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-05 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-11-05 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  10. 2026-11-04 23:25 UTCOSV refresh
  11. 2026-11-04 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 09:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-04 09:58 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-04 09:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  15. 2026-11-03 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  16. 2026-11-03 12:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-03 12:07 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-03 12:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  19. 2026-11-02 14:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-02 14:14 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-11-02 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  22. 2026-11-01 16:23 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-01 16:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  24. 2026-11-01 08:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-01 08:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qmgx-j96g-4428 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  26. 2026-10-31 18:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  28. 2026-10-30 20:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-30 20:27 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  31. 2026-10-29 22:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-29 22:35 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  34. 2026-10-29 00:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-29 00:45 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  37. 2026-10-28 02:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-28 02:51 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 86th percentile
  40. 2026-10-27 04:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-27 04:54 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 86th percentile
  43. 2026-10-26 02:51 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-25 17:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 86th percentile
  46. 2026-10-25 04:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-25 04:56 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.5% · 84th percentile
  49. 2026-10-24 07:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-24 07:05 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.5% · 84th percentile
  52. 2026-10-23 09:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-23 09:13 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.5% · 84th percentile
  55. 2026-10-22 11:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-22 11:22 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.5% · 84th percentile
  58. 2026-10-21 13:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-21 13:31 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.5% · 84th percentile
  61. 2026-10-20 15:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-20 15:29 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.5% · 84th percentile
  64. 2026-10-19 16:09 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-18 18:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-18 18:13 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.5% · 84th percentile
  68. 2026-10-18 07:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-17 20:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-17 20:20 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.5% · 84th percentile
  72. 2026-10-16 22:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-16 22:25 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.5% · 84th percentile
  75. 2026-10-15 19:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Public detection templates

(1 reference)

A public Nuclei detection template is referenced for this CVE. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code.

  • Nucleihttp/cves/2024/CVE-2024-28752.yaml
    Published Apr 7, 2026

    Apache CXF < 4.0.4 - Aegis DataBinding SSRF / Local File Read

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-28752?
CVE-2024-28752 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 15, 2024. A SSRF vulnerability using the Aegis DataBinding in versions of Apache CXF before 4.0.4, 3.6.3 and 3.5.8 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on webservices that take at least one parameter of any type. Users of other data bindings (including the default databinding) are not impacted.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-28752 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-28752 was published on March 15, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 27, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-28752 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-28752 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 3.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (88th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-28752?
CVE-2024-28752 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-28752?
A fix for CVE-2024-28752 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-28752 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-28752

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-28752?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.