CVE-2024-27304

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-03-04. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2024-0972 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2024-2606 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.1%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

pgx is a PostgreSQL driver and toolkit for Go. SQL injection can occur if an attacker can cause a single query or bind message to exceed 4 GB in size. An integer overflow in the calculated message size can cause the one large message to be sent as multiple messages under the attacker's control. The problem is resolved in v4.18.2 and v5.5.4. As a workaround, reject user input large enough to cause a single query or bind message to exceed 4 GB in size.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
1.1%
EPSS %ILE
66th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
1.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

March 6, 2024

Last Modified

May 21, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Oct 8, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit adbb38f298c7 (jackc/pgx)

Patch available: jackc/pgx v5.11.0 (contains commit adbb38f298c7)

https://github.com/jackc/pgx/commit/adbb38f298c76e283ffc7c7a3f571036fea47fd4
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

SQL Injection via Protocol Message Size Overflow · Advisory · jackc/pgproto3 · GitHub

https://github.com/jackc/pgproto3/security/advisories/GHSA-7jwh-3vrq-q3m8
GitHub commit

commit 945c2126f6db (jackc/pgproto3)

Fix landed in jackc/pgproto3 commit 945c2126f6db — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/jackc/pgproto3/commit/945c2126f6db8f3bea7eeebe307c01fe92bca007
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

SQL Injection via Protocol Message Size Overflow · Advisory · jackc/pgx · GitHub

https://github.com/jackc/pgx/security/advisories/GHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv
GitHub commit

commit f94eb0e2f967 (jackc/pgx)

Fix landed in jackc/pgx commit f94eb0e2f967 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/jackc/pgx/commit/f94eb0e2f96782042c96801b5ac448f44f0a81df
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit c543134753a0 (jackc/pgx)

Patch available: jackc/pgx v5.11.0 (contains commit c543134753a0)

https://github.com/jackc/pgx/commit/c543134753a0c5d22881c12404025724cb05ffd8

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatadvanced-cluster-security/rhacs-scanner-slim-rhel8:4.3.5-32024-03-13redhat
gogithub.com/jackc/pgx @ 4.18.2 (fixes < 4.18.2)—ghsa
gogithub.com/jackc/pgx @ 5.5.4 (fixes >= 5.0.0, < 5.5.4)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(12 across 5 ecosystems)
Go(5)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/jackc/pgproto3—
  • every version up to 2.3.3: fixed in 2.3.3
—
github.com/jackc/pgproto3/v2—
  • every version up to 2.3.3: fixed in 2.3.3
—
github.com/jackc/pgx—
  • every version up to 4.18.2: fixed in 4.18.2
  • 5.0.0 up to 5.5.4: fixed in 5.5.4
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
github.com/jackc/pgx/v4—
  • every version up to 4.18.2: fixed in 4.18.2
—
github.com/jackc/pgx/v5—
  • 5.0.0 up to 5.5.4: fixed in 5.5.4
—
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-github-jackc-pgconn1.11.0-2, 1.14.0-1, 1.14.3-1, 1.14.3-1~exp0
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
golang-github-jackc-pgx4.15.0-4 ... 4.18.3-2 (6 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-github-jackc-pgconn1.14.0-1, 1.14.3-1, 1.14.3-1~exp0
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
golang-github-jackc-pgx—
  • every version up to 4.18.1-2: fixed in 4.18.1-2
—
Debian:14(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-github-jackc-pgconn1.14.0-1, 1.14.3-1~exp0
  • every version up to 1.14.3-1: fixed in 1.14.3-1
—
golang-github-jackc-pgx—
  • every version up to 4.18.1-2: fixed in 4.18.1-2
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-github-jackc-pgx3.6.2-2 ... 4.18.3-2 (10 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 72× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 309 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 209 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 66th percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 13:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 13:36 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-13 13:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-11-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 66th percentile
  6. 2026-11-12 12:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-12 12:14 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-12 12:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-11 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 66th percentile
  10. 2026-11-11 10:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-11 10:56 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-11 10:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-11-10 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 66th percentile
  14. 2026-11-10 09:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-10 09:37 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-10 09:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-09 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 66th percentile
  18. 2026-11-09 08:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-09 08:18 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-09 08:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 66th percentile
  22. 2026-11-08 07:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-08 07:00 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-08 07:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-07 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 66th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-07 05:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-07 05:41 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-07 05:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-06 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 66th percentile
  5. 2026-11-06 04:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-06 04:22 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-06 04:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-05 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 66th percentile
  9. 2026-11-05 03:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-05 03:00 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-05 03:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-04 22:55 UTCOSV refresh
  13. 2026-11-04 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  14. 2026-11-04 01:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-04 01:41 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-04 01:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-03 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  18. 2026-11-03 00:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-03 00:22 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-03 00:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-02 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  22. 2026-11-01 23:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-01 23:04 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-01 23:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  26. 2026-11-01 08:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mrww-27vc-gghv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-11-01 08:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-31 21:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-31 21:45 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  31. 2026-10-30 20:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-30 20:27 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  34. 2026-10-29 19:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-29 19:09 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  37. 2026-10-28 17:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-28 17:51 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  40. 2026-10-27 16:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-27 16:33 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  43. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  44. 2026-10-26 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-25 17:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  47. 2026-10-25 12:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-25 12:51 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  50. 2026-10-24 11:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-24 11:33 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  53. 2026-10-23 10:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-23 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  56. 2026-10-22 08:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-22 08:52 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  59. 2026-10-21 07:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-21 07:33 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  62. 2026-10-20 06:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-20 06:15 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  65. 2026-10-19 04:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-19 04:56 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  68. 2026-10-18 03:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-18 03:36 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  71. 2026-10-17 02:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-17 02:16 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  74. 2026-10-16 00:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-16 00:53 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-27304?
CVE-2024-27304 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 6, 2024. pgx is a PostgreSQL driver and toolkit for Go. SQL injection can occur if an attacker can cause a single query or bind message to exceed 4 GB in size. An integer overflow in the calculated message size can cause the one large message to be sent as multiple messages under the attacker's control. The…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-27304 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-27304 was published on March 6, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of May 21, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-27304 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-27304 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (66th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-27304?
CVE-2024-27304 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-27304?
A fix for CVE-2024-27304 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-27304 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-27304

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-27304?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.