CVE-2024-10914

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 98% (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory CVSS 8.1 is lower than this score; a lower GitHub score revises it only when its advisory is newer than the CVE record's last change, and this advisory (published 2024-11-06) is not newer than that change (2026-11-04), so it does not.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Weaponized

Also known asEUVD-2024-33344 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix is confirmed yet: check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 98%
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 98%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

A vulnerability was found in D-Link DNS-320, DNS-320LW, DNS-325 and DNS-340L up to 20241028. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function cgi_user_add of the file /cgi-bin/account_mgr.cgi?cmd=cgi_user_add. The manipulation of the argument name leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
98
EG Risk 98/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation98% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
98%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
98% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 6, 2024

Last Modified

November 4, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Nov 7, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. No fix on record yet.

Weakness Classification(3)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 131 rows on record for this CVE, as 98 entries (2 repeats merged).

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 31 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 98% · 99th percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 04:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 04:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  4. 2026-11-12 03:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  6. 2026-11-11 02:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-11 02:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  8. 2026-11-10 07:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-10 07:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  10. 2026-11-09 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 98% · 99th percentile
  11. 2026-11-09 06:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-09 06:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  13. 2026-11-08 05:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-08 05:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  15. 2026-11-07 03:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-07 03:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  17. 2026-11-06 02:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-06 02:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  19. 2026-11-05 01:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-05 01:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  21. 2026-11-04 00:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-04 00:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  23. 2026-11-04 00:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  24. 2026-11-03 22:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored▲ 0.80
  25. 2026-11-03 22:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-11-03 22:26 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 9.8 · severity → CRITICAL
  2. 2026-11-03 21:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-03 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  4. 2026-11-02 21:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-02 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  6. 2026-11-01 20:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-01 20:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  8. 2026-10-31 19:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-31 19:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  10. 2026-10-30 17:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-10-30 17:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  12. 2026-10-29 16:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-29 16:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  14. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 98% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-10-28 15:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-28 15:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  17. 2026-10-27 14:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-27 14:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  19. 2026-10-26 13:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  20. 2026-10-25 17:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 98% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-10-25 11:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-25 11:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  24. 2026-10-24 10:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-24 10:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  26. 2026-10-23 09:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-23 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  28. 2026-10-22 08:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-22 08:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  30. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  31. 2026-10-21 07:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-21 07:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  33. 2026-10-20 05:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-20 05:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  35. 2026-10-19 04:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-19 04:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  37. 2026-10-18 03:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-18 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  39. 2026-10-17 02:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-17 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  41. 2026-10-16 01:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-16 01:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  43. 2026-10-14 20:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-14 20:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  45. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  46. 2026-10-13 16:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-13 16:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  48. 2026-10-12 15:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-12 15:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qp96-9hxv-3xx4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  50. 2026-10-11 21:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-09-30 16:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-09-22 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  53. 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  54. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  55. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  56. 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  57. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  58. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  59. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  60. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  61. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  62. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  63. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 96% · 99th percentile
  64. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  65. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  66. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  67. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  68. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  69. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  70. 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  71. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  72. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  73. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(7 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry, 5 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-52643
    Published Aug 17, 2026

    D-Link DNS_340L - OS Command Injection

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCredspy-sec/D-Link
    Published Dec 6, 2024

    CVE-2024-10914 D-Link Remote Code Execution (RCE)

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCK3ysTr0K3R/CVE-2024-10914-EXPLOIT
    Published Nov 27, 2024

    A PoC exploit for CVE-2024-10914 - D-Link Remote Code Execution (RCE)

    Open source ↗
  • Nucleihttp/cves/2024/CVE-2024-10914.yaml
    Published Nov 17, 2024

    D-Link NAS - Command Injection via Name Parameter

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCThemeHackers/CVE-2024-10914
    Published Nov 16, 2024

    CVE-2024-10914 is a critical command injection vulnerability affecting several legacy D-Link Network Attached Storage (NAS) devices.

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCverylazytech/CVE-2024-10914
    Published Nov 10, 2024

    POC - CVE-2024–10914- Command Injection Vulnerability in `name` parameter for D-Link NAS

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCimnotcha0s/CVE-2024-10914
    Published Nov 9, 2024

    Exploit for cve-2024-10914: D-Link DNS-320, DNS-320LW, DNS-325, DNS-340L Version 1.00, Version 1.01.0914.2012, Version 1.01, Version 1.02, Version 1.08 Command Injection

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-10914?
CVE-2024-10914 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 6, 2024. A vulnerability was found in D-Link DNS-320, DNS-320LW, DNS-325 and DNS-340L up to 20241028. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function cgi_user_add of the file /cgi-bin/account_mgr.cgi?cmd=cgi_user_add. The manipulation of the argument name leads to os command…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-10914 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-10914 was published on November 6, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 4, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-10914 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-10914 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: CISA's SSVC data says a public PoC exists and its EPSS is 50% or more. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 98% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-10914?
CVE-2024-10914 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-10914?
No fix for CVE-2024-10914 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch for a fix.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-10914

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-10914?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.