CVE-2023-53143

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-05-02. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: fix another off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems

Apparently syzbot figured out that issuing this FSMAP call:

struct fsmap_head cmd = { .fmh_count = ...; .fmh_keys = { { .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, { .fmr_device = /* ext4 dev */, .fmr_physical = 0, }, }, ... }; ret = ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_GETFSMAP, &cmd);

Produces this crash if the underlying filesystem is a 1k-block ext4 filesystem:

kernel BUG at fs/ext4/ext4.h:3331! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU: 3 PID: 3227965 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G W O 6.2.0-rc8-achx Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp+0x47c/0x570 [ext4] RSP: 0018:ffffc90007c03998 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffff888004978000 RBX: ffffc90007c03a20 RCX: ffff888041618000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000005a4 RDI: ffffffffa0c99b11 RBP: ffff888012330000 R08: ffffffffa0c2b7d0 R09: 0000000000000400 R10: ffffc90007c03950 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000c40 R15: ffff88802678c398 FS: 00007fdf2020c880(0000) GS:ffff88807e100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffd318a5fe8 CR3: 000000007f80f001 CR4: 00000000001706e0 Call Trace: ext4_mballoc_query_range+0x4b/0x210 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_getfsmap_datadev+0x713/0x890 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_getfsmap+0x2b7/0x330 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] ext4_ioc_getfsmap+0x153/0x2b0 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] __ext4_ioctl+0x2a7/0x17e0 [ext4 dfa189daddffe8fecd3cdfd00564e0f265a8ab80] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 RIP: 0033:0x7fdf20558aff RSP: 002b:00007ffd318a9e30 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000200c0 RCX: 00007fdf20558aff RDX: 00007fdf1feb2010 RSI: 00000000c0c0583b RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00005625c0634be0 R08: 00005625c0634c40 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fdf1feb2010 R13: 00005625be70d994 R14: 0000000000000800 R15: 0000000000000000

For GETFSMAP calls, the caller selects a physical block device by writing its block number into fsmap_head.fmh_keys[01].fmr_device. To query mappings for a subrange of the device, the starting byte of the range is written to fsmap_head.fmh_keys[0].fmr_physical and the last byte of the range goes in fsmap_head.fmh_keys[1].fmr_physical.

IOWs, to query what mappings overlap with bytes 3-14 of /dev/sda, you'd set the inputs as follows:

fmh_keys[0] = { .fmr_device = major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 3}, fmh_keys[1] = { .fmr_device = major(8, 0), .fmr_physical = 14},

Which would return you whatever is mapped in the 12 bytes starting at physical offset 3.

The crash is due to insufficient range validation of keys[1] in ext4_getfsmap_datadev. On 1k-block filesystems, block 0 is not part of the filesystem, which means that s_first_data_block is nonzero. ext4_get_group_no_and_offset subtracts this quantity from the blocknr argument before cracking it into a group number and a block number within a group. IOWs, block group 0 spans blocks 1-8192 (1-based) instead of 0-8191 (0-based) like what happens with larger blocksizes.

The net result of this encoding is that blocknr < s_first_data_block is not a valid input to this function. The end_fsb variable is set from the keys that are copied from userspace, which means that in the above example, its value is zero. That leads to an underflow here:

blocknr = blocknr - le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block);

The division then operates on -1:

offset = do_div(blocknr, EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)) >> EXT4_SB(sb)->s_cluster_bits;

Leaving an impossibly large group number (2^32-1) in blocknr. ext4_getfsmap_check_keys checked that keys[0 ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
6%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 2, 2025

Last Modified

November 10, 2025

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 4.14.310osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-24 07:11 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-23 02:29 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-22 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 67 more
  1. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-07 02:51 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-18 13:43 UTCOSV refresh
  35. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-30 06:13 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-05-30 06:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-53143?
CVE-2023-53143 is a medium vulnerability published on May 2, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix another off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems Apparently syzbot figured out that issuing this FSMAP call: struct fsmap_head cmd = { .fmh_count = ...; .fmh_keys = { { .fmrdevice = /* ext4 dev */, .fmrphysical = 0,…
When was CVE-2023-53143 disclosed?
CVE-2023-53143 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 2, 2025, with the most recent update on November 10, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-53143 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-53143 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 93.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-53143?
CVE-2023-53143 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-53143?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2023-53143, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2023-53143

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-53143?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.