CVE-2023-53022

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-03-27. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: enetc: avoid deadlock in enetc_tx_onestep_tstamp()

This lockdep splat says it better than I could:

================================ WARNING: inconsistent lock state 6.2.0-rc2-07010-ga9b9500ffaac-dirty #967 Not tainted -------------------------------- inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage. kworker/1:3/179 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: ffff3ec4036ce098 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.?.}-{3:3}, at: netif_freeze_queues+0x5c/0xc0 {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at: _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0xc0 sch_direct_xmit+0x148/0x37c __dev_queue_xmit+0x528/0x111c ip6_finish_output2+0x5ec/0xb7c ip6_finish_output+0x240/0x3f0 ip6_output+0x78/0x360 ndisc_send_skb+0x33c/0x85c ndisc_send_rs+0x54/0x12c addrconf_rs_timer+0x154/0x260 call_timer_fn+0xb8/0x3a0 __run_timers.part.0+0x214/0x26c run_timer_softirq+0x3c/0x74 __do_softirq+0x14c/0x5d8 ____do_softirq+0x10/0x20 call_on_irq_stack+0x2c/0x5c do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x30 __irq_exit_rcu+0x168/0x1a0 irq_exit_rcu+0x10/0x40 el1_interrupt+0x38/0x64 irq event stamp: 7825 hardirqs last enabled at (7825): [] exit_to_kernel_mode+0x34/0x130 hardirqs last disabled at (7823): [] __do_softirq+0x550/0x5d8 softirqs last enabled at (7824): [] __do_softirq+0x46c/0x5d8 softirqs last disabled at (7811): [] ____do_softirq+0x10/0x20

other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 ---- lock(_xmit_ETHER#2); lock(_xmit_ETHER#2);

* DEADLOCK *

3 locks held by kworker/1:3/179: #0: ffff3ec400004748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f4/0x6c0 #1: ffff80000a0bbdc8 ((work_completion)(&priv->tx_onestep_tstamp)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f4/0x6c0 #2: ffff3ec4036cd438 (&dev->tx_global_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: netif_tx_lock+0x1c/0x34

Workqueue: events enetc_tx_onestep_tstamp Call trace: print_usage_bug.part.0+0x208/0x22c mark_lock+0x7f0/0x8b0 __lock_acquire+0x7c4/0x1ce0 lock_acquire.part.0+0xe0/0x220 lock_acquire+0x68/0x84 _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0xc0 netif_freeze_queues+0x5c/0xc0 netif_tx_lock+0x24/0x34 enetc_tx_onestep_tstamp+0x20/0x100 process_one_work+0x28c/0x6c0 worker_thread+0x74/0x450 kthread+0x118/0x11c

but I'll say it anyway: the enetc_tx_onestep_tstamp() work item runs in process context, therefore with softirqs enabled (i.o.w., it can be interrupted by a softirq). If we hold the netif_tx_lock() when there is an interrupt, and the NET_TX softirq then gets scheduled, this will take the netif_tx_lock() a second time and deadlock the kernel.

To solve this, use netif_tx_lock_bh(), which blocks softirqs from running.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

March 27, 2025

Last Modified

October 1, 2025

References (3)

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.15.91—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-24 10:41 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-23 02:29 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-22 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 70 more
  1. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-07 06:21 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-18 17:35 UTCOSV refresh
  38. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-30 08:41 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-05-30 08:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-53022?
CVE-2023-53022 is a medium vulnerability published on March 27, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: enetc: avoid deadlock in enetctxonestep_tstamp() This lockdep splat says it better than I could: ================================ WARNING: inconsistent lock state 6.2.0-rc2-07010-ga9b9500ffaac-dirty #967 Not tainted…
When was CVE-2023-53022 disclosed?
CVE-2023-53022 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on March 27, 2025, with the most recent update on October 1, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-53022 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-53022 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-53022?
CVE-2023-53022 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-53022?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2023-53022, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2023-53022

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-53022?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs