CVE-2023-43791

CRITICALNVD 8.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2023-11-09. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8; sources differ by 1.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2023-0107 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-f475-x83m-rx5m (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2023-274 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.6%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Label Studio is a multi-type data labeling and annotation tool with standardized output format. There is a vulnerability that can be chained within the ORM Leak vulnerability to impersonate any account on Label Studio. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities to escalate their privileges from a low privilege user to a Django Super Administrator user. The vulnerability was found to affect versions before 1.8.2, where a patch was introduced.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
75
EG Risk 75/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
1.6%
EPSS %ILE
76th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
1.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 9, 2023

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated May 29, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github_pr, github_release, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Hardcoded Django `SECRET_KEY` that can be Abused to Forge Session Tokens · Advisory · HumanSignal/label-studio · GitHub

https://github.com/HumanSignal/label-studio/security/advisories/GHSA-f475-x83m-rx5m
GitHub release Patch Available

1.8.2

Patch available: HumanSignal/label-studio 1.8.2

https://github.com/HumanSignal/label-studio/releases/tag/1.8.2
GitHub pull request

fix: LSDV-5071: Ensure secret key is securely set persisting a new one if required

Fix merged in HumanSignal/label-studio PR #4690 on 2023-08-28 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/HumanSignal/label-studio/pull/4690
GitHub commit

commit 3d06c5131c15 (HumanSignal/label-studio)

Fix landed in HumanSignal/label-studio commit 3d06c5131c15 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/HumanSignal/label-studio/commit/3d06c5131c15600621e08b06f07d976887cde81b

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-43791(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
piplabel-studio @ 1.8.2 (fixes < 1.8.2)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
label-studio0.4.1 ... 1.8.1 (68 versions)
  • every version up to 1.8.2: fixed in 1.8.2
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 260 rows on record for this CVE, as 94 entries (6 repeats merged).

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 160 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 07:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 07:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f475-x83m-rx5m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 76th percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 05:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 05:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f475-x83m-rx5m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-11 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 76th percentile
  7. 2026-11-11 03:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-11 03:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f475-x83m-rx5m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-10 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  10. 2026-11-10 01:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-10 01:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f475-x83m-rx5m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-09 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 69th percentile
  13. 2026-11-08 23:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-08 23:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f475-x83m-rx5m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 69th percentile
  16. 2026-11-07 21:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-07 21:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f475-x83m-rx5m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-11-07 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 69th percentile
  19. 2026-11-06 19:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-06 19:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f475-x83m-rx5m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-06 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 69th percentile
  22. 2026-11-05 16:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-05 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f475-x83m-rx5m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-11-05 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 69th percentile
  25. 2026-11-04 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 69th percentile
Show 69 more
  1. 2026-11-04 16:25 UTCOSV refresh
  2. 2026-11-04 14:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-04 14:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f475-x83m-rx5m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-03 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 69th percentile
  5. 2026-11-03 12:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-03 12:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f475-x83m-rx5m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-02 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 69th percentile
  8. 2026-11-02 10:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-02 10:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f475-x83m-rx5m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 69th percentile
  11. 2026-11-01 08:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f475-x83m-rx5m · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-01 08:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored▲ 1.00
  13. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 69th percentile
  14. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 69th percentile
  15. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 69th percentile
  16. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 69th percentile
  17. 2026-10-27 19:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 69th percentile
  19. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  20. 2026-10-25 17:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  22. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  23. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  24. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  25. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  26. 2026-10-20 23:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  28. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  29. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  30. 2026-10-18 07:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  32. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  33. 2026-10-15 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  34. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  35. 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  36. 2026-10-12 16:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  38. 2026-10-11 21:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  40. 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  41. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  42. 2026-10-08 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  43. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  44. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  45. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  46. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  47. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  48. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  49. 2026-09-30 16:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  51. 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  52. 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  53. 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  54. 2026-09-26 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  55. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  56. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  57. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  58. 2026-09-22 16:58 UTCOSV refresh
  59. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  60. 2026-09-18 19:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  61. 2026-09-17 19:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  62. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  63. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  64. 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  65. 2026-09-12 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  66. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  67. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  68. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  69. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile

Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-43791?
CVE-2023-43791 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 9, 2023. Label Studio is a multi-type data labeling and annotation tool with standardized output format. There is a vulnerability that can be chained within the ORM Leak vulnerability to impersonate any account on Label Studio. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities to escalate their privileges…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-43791 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2023-43791 was published on November 9, 2023. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2023-43791 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-43791 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (76th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-43791?
CVE-2023-43791 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.8 (CRITICAL).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-43791?
A fix for CVE-2023-43791 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2023-43791 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-43791

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-43791?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Book a Demo →Browse All CVEs