CVE-2022-51015

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.56.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 6.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-07. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2022-56044 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 6.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

PocketMine-MP before 4.0.6 does not validate facing values in PlayerActionPacket (for START_BREAK and CRACK_BREAK actions) or in UseItemTransactionData (typically within InventoryTransactionPacket). A remote authenticated attacker can send crafted packets with invalid facing values (e.g., negative or out-of-range) to crash the server, resulting in a denial of service.

CVSS v3
6.5
EG Score
6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
30
EG Risk 30/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity65% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
53rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-10). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 7, 2026

Last Modified

November 10, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 7, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
Web page

PocketMine-MP before 4.0.6 Denial of Service via PlayerActionPacket | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/pocketmine-mp-before-4.0.6-denial-of-service-via-playeractionpacket
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Unchecked validity of Facing values in PlayerActionPacket · Advisory · pmmp/PocketMine-MP · GitHub

https://github.com/pmmp/PocketMine-MP/security/advisories/GHSA-xh99-hw7h-wf63
GitHub commit

commit f126479c37ff (pmmp/PocketMine-MP)

Fix landed in pmmp/PocketMine-MP commit f126479c37ff — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/pmmp/PocketMine-MP/commit/f126479c37ff00a717a828f5271cf8e821d12d6c

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-51015(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
pocketmine/pocketmine-mp3.0.0 ... 4.0.5 (174 versions)
  • every version up to 4.0.6: fixed in 4.0.6
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 132 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 32 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 05:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 05:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  6. 2026-11-10 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 12:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-10 12:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  9. 2026-11-09 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  10. 2026-11-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  11. 2026-11-07 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  12. 2026-11-06 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  13. 2026-11-05 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  14. 2026-11-04 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  15. 2026-11-03 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  16. 2026-11-02 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  17. 2026-11-01 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  18. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  19. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  21. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  23. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-25 17:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-24 17:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-10-24 17:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  3. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  4. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  5. 2026-10-22 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  6. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  7. 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  8. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  9. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  10. 2026-10-18 08:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  12. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  13. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  14. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  15. 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  16. 2026-10-12 18:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  18. 2026-10-11 22:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  20. 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  21. 2026-10-09 22:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-09 22:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  23. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  24. 2026-10-08 17:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  25. 2026-10-08 16:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-08 16:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  27. 2026-10-08 15:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-08 15:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  29. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  30. 2026-10-07 08:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-07 08:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  32. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  33. 2026-10-06 06:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-06 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  35. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  36. 2026-10-05 03:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-05 03:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  38. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  39. 2026-10-04 00:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-04 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  41. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  42. 2026-10-02 22:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-02 22:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  44. 2026-10-01 19:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-01 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  46. 2026-09-30 17:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-09-30 17:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  48. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  49. 2026-09-29 14:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-09-29 14:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  51. 2026-09-28 12:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-09-28 12:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  53. 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  54. 2026-09-27 10:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-09-27 10:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  56. 2026-09-26 15:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  57. 2026-09-26 07:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-09-26 07:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  59. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  60. 2026-09-25 05:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-09-25 05:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  62. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  63. 2026-09-24 03:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-09-24 03:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  65. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  66. 2026-09-23 01:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-09-23 01:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  68. 2026-09-21 23:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-09-21 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  70. 2026-09-20 21:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-09-20 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  72. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  73. 2026-09-19 18:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-09-19 18:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jqrm-67hm-q329 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  75. 2026-09-18 16:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-51015?
CVE-2022-51015 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 7, 2026. PocketMine-MP before 4.0.6 does not validate facing values in PlayerActionPacket (for START_BREAK and CRACK_BREAK actions) or in UseItemTransactionData (typically within InventoryTransactionPacket). A remote authenticated attacker can send crafted packets with invalid facing values (e.g., negative…
When was CVE-2022-51015 made public?
CVE-2022-51015 was made public on January 13, 2022: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on September 7, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 10, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2022-51015 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-51015 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (53rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-51015?
CVE-2022-51015 has a CVSS base score of 6.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-51015?
A fix for CVE-2022-51015 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2022-51015 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-51015

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-51015?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.