CVE-2022-50428

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-10-01. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: fix off-by-one errors in fast-commit block filling

Due to several different off-by-one errors, or perhaps due to a late change in design that wasn't fully reflected in the code that was actually merged, there are several very strange constraints on how fast-commit blocks are filled with tlv entries:

  • tlvs must start at least 10 bytes before the end of the block, even
though the minimum tlv length is 8. Otherwise, the replay code will ignore them. (BUG: ext4_fc_reserve_space() could violate this requirement if called with a len of blocksize - 9 or blocksize - 8. Fortunately, this doesn't seem to happen currently.)
  • tlvs must end at least 1 byte before the end of the block. Otherwise
the replay code will consider them to be invalid. This quirk contributed to a bug (fixed by an earlier commit) where uninitialized memory was being leaked to disk in the last byte of blocks.

Also, strangely these constraints don't apply to the replay code in e2fsprogs, which will accept any tlvs in the blocks (with no bounds checks at all, but that is a separate issue...).

Given that this all seems to be a bug, let's fix it by just filling blocks with tlv entries in the natural way.

Note that old kernels will be unable to replay fast-commit journals created by kernels that have this commit.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

October 1, 2025

Last Modified

January 20, 2026

References (4)

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.15.87—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 19:11 UTCOSV refresh
  4. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-23 02:17 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-22 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 70 more
  1. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 13:11 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-18 01:35 UTCOSV refresh
  36. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-29 21:49 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-05-29 21:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-50428?
CVE-2022-50428 is a medium vulnerability published on October 1, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix off-by-one errors in fast-commit block filling Due to several different off-by-one errors, or perhaps due to a late change in design that wasn't fully reflected in the code that was actually merged, there are several very…
When was CVE-2022-50428 disclosed?
CVE-2022-50428 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on October 1, 2025, with the most recent update on January 20, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-50428 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-50428 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 95.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-50428?
CVE-2022-50428 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-50428?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-50428, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-50428

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-50428?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs