CVE-2022-41622

CRITICALNVD 8.89.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicted 92% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.

Triggered by: EPSS exploit prediction (continuous uplift above 30%)
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Weaponized

Also known asEUVD-2022-44813 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix is confirmed yet: check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 92%
  • Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, other public proof-of-concept code)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 92%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: Metasploit · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In all versions, 

BIG-IP and BIG-IQ are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks through iControl SOAP.  

Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
77
EG Risk 77/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation92% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.
EPSS PROB
92%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is EPSS's lift toward 9.0 from its impact severity (EG Severity, CVSS 8.8 HIGH): a likelihood of exploitation, not impact.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
92% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

December 7, 2022

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Aug 19, 2026
No fix on record yet.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 149 rows on record for this CVE, as 97 entries (3 repeats merged).

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 49 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 00:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 00:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  3. 2026-11-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 00:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 00:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  6. 2026-11-11 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  7. 2026-11-11 00:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-11 00:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  9. 2026-11-10 00:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-10 00:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  11. 2026-11-09 01:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-09 01:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  13. 2026-11-08 01:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-08 01:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  15. 2026-11-07 01:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-07 01:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  17. 2026-11-06 02:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-06 02:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  19. 2026-11-05 02:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-05 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  21. 2026-11-04 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-11-04 02:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-04 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  24. 2026-11-03 02:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-03 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
Show 72 more
  1. 2026-11-02 03:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-02 03:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  3. 2026-11-01 03:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-01 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  5. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-10-31 03:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-10-31 03:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  8. 2026-10-30 04:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-30 04:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  10. 2026-10-29 04:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-10-29 04:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  12. 2026-10-28 04:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-28 04:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  14. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-10-27 04:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-27 04:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  17. 2026-10-26 00:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  18. 2026-10-25 18:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-10-25 00:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-25 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  22. 2026-10-24 01:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-24 01:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  24. 2026-10-23 01:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-23 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  26. 2026-10-22 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  27. 2026-10-22 01:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-22 01:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  29. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  30. 2026-10-21 01:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-21 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  32. 2026-10-20 02:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-20 02:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  34. 2026-10-19 01:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-19 01:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  36. 2026-10-18 08:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-18 01:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-18 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  39. 2026-10-17 02:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-17 02:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  41. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  42. 2026-10-16 02:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-16 02:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  44. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  45. 2026-10-14 22:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-14 22:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  47. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  48. 2026-10-13 17:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-13 17:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  50. 2026-10-12 18:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-12 18:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3wmp-g7x5-v6hv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  52. 2026-10-11 22:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  54. 2026-09-30 16:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  56. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  57. 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  58. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  59. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  60. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  61. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  62. 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  63. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  64. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  65. 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  66. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  67. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  68. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  69. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  70. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  71. 2026-08-11 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  72. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(2 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 GitHub PoC). No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.

  • Metasploitexploit/linux/http/f5_icontrol_soap_csrf_rce_cve_2022_41622✓ verified
    Published Nov 18, 2022

    F5 BIG-IP iControl CSRF File Write SOAP API

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCrbowes-r7/refreshing-soap-exploit
    Published Aug 3, 2022

    A PoC exploit for CVE-2022-41622 - a CSRF in F5 BIG-IP control plane that leads to remote root

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-41622?
CVE-2022-41622 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on December 7, 2022. In all versions, BIG-IP and BIG-IQ are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks through iControl SOAP. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
When was CVE-2022-41622 made public?
CVE-2022-41622 was made public on November 16, 2022: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, F5, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on December 7, 2022. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2022-41622 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-41622 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: a Metasploit module exists for it. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 92% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-41622?
CVE-2022-41622 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-41622?
No fix for CVE-2022-41622 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-41622

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-41622?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.