CVE-2022-36096

CRITICALNVD 8.99.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicted 60% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. NVD baseline CVSS 8.9 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.

Triggered by: EPSS exploit prediction (continuous uplift above 30%)
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2022-6824 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 60%
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 60%CVSS: 8.9Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

The XWiki Platform Index UI is an Index of all pages, attachments, orphans and deleted pages and attachments for XWiki Platform, a generic wiki platform. Prior to versions 13.10.6 and 14.3, it's possible to store JavaScript which will be executed by anyone viewing the deleted attachments index with an attachment containing javascript in its name. This issue has been patched in XWiki 13.10.6 and 14.3. As a workaround, modify fix the vulnerability by editing the wiki page XWiki.DeletedAttachments with the object editor, open the JavaScriptExtension object and apply on the content the changes that can be found on the fix commit.

CVSS v3
8.9
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
64
EG Risk 64/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity89% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation60% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
60%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is EPSS's lift toward 9.0 from its impact severity (EG Severity, CVSS 8.9 HIGH): a likelihood of exploitation, not impact.

EG Severity
8.9 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
60% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 8, 2022

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jul 26, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

XSS in the deleted attachments list · Advisory · xwiki/xwiki-platform · GitHub

https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/security/advisories/GHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 6705b0cd0289 (xwiki/xwiki-platform)

Patch available: xwiki/xwiki-platform xwiki-platform-17.4.8 (contains commit 6705b0cd0289)

https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/commit/6705b0cd0289d1c90ed354bd4ecc1508c4b25745

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-36096(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
mavenorg.xwiki.platform:xwiki-platform-index-ui @ 13.10.6 (fixes >= 2.2-milestone-1, < 13.10.6)—ghsa
mavenorg.xwiki.platform:xwiki-platform-index-ui @ 14.3 (fixes >= 14.0, < 14.3)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.xwiki.platform:xwiki-platform-index-ui—
  • 2.2-milestone-1 up to 13.10.6: fixed in 13.10.6
  • 14.0 up to 14.3: fixed in 14.3
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 217 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 117 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 07:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 07:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.9
  3. 2026-11-12 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 08:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 08:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.9
  6. 2026-11-11 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  7. 2026-11-11 09:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-11 09:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.9
  9. 2026-11-10 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-11-10 10:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-10 10:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.9
  12. 2026-11-09 11:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-09 11:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.9
  14. 2026-11-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-11-08 12:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-08 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.9
  17. 2026-11-07 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-11-07 14:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-07 14:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.9
  20. 2026-11-06 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  21. 2026-11-06 15:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-06 15:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.9
  23. 2026-11-05 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  24. 2026-11-05 16:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.9
  25. 2026-11-04 17:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-04 17:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.9
  2. 2026-11-04 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  3. 2026-11-04 04:55 UTCOSV refresh
  4. 2026-11-03 18:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-03 18:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.9
  6. 2026-11-03 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  7. 2026-11-02 19:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-02 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.9
  9. 2026-11-01 21:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-01 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.9
  11. 2026-11-01 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-11-01 08:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gjmq-x5x7-wc36 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.9
  13. 2026-11-01 08:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-31 22:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  16. 2026-10-30 23:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-30 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-10-30 00:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-10-29 01:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 02:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  24. 2026-10-27 03:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-25 18:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  27. 2026-10-25 02:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  29. 2026-10-24 03:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  31. 2026-10-23 04:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-22 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  33. 2026-10-22 05:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  35. 2026-10-21 06:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  37. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  38. 2026-10-18 08:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  40. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  41. 2026-10-15 20:24 UTCOSV refresh
  42. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  43. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  44. 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  45. 2026-10-12 18:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-11 23:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  48. 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  49. 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  50. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  51. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  52. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  53. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  54. 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  55. 2026-10-01 19:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  56. 2026-09-30 15:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  58. 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  59. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  60. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
  61. 2026-09-24 12:07 UTCOSV refresh
  62. 2026-09-22 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
  63. 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
  64. 2026-09-17 19:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
  65. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
  66. 2026-09-15 03:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
  67. 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
  68. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
  69. 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
  70. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
  71. 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
  72. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
  73. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
  74. 2026-09-05 04:48 UTCOSV refresh
  75. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-36096?
CVE-2022-36096 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 8, 2022. The XWiki Platform Index UI is an Index of all pages, attachments, orphans and deleted pages and attachments for XWiki Platform, a generic wiki platform. Prior to versions 13.10.6 and 14.3, it's possible to store JavaScript which will be executed by anyone viewing the deleted attachments index with…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-36096 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2022-36096 was published on September 8, 2022. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2022-36096 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-36096 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 60% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-36096?
CVE-2022-36096 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.9 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-36096?
A fix for CVE-2022-36096 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2022-36096 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-36096

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-36096?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.