CVE-2022-31799

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2022-06-03. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2022-0032 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2022-227 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 2.1%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Bottle before 0.12.20 mishandles errors during early request binding.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
45
EG Risk 45/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation2.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
2.1%
EPSS %ILE
82nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
2.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 2, 2022

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Oct 10, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit.
Web page

Comparing 0.12.19...0.12.20 · bottlepy/bottle · GitHub

https://github.com/bottlepy/bottle/compare/0.12.19...0.12.20
GitHub commit

commit e140e1b54da7 (bottlepy/bottle)

Fix landed in bottlepy/bottle commit e140e1b54da7 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/bottlepy/bottle/commit/e140e1b54da721a660f2eb9d58a106b7b3ff2f00
GitHub commit

commit a2b0ee6bb4ce (bottlepy/bottle)

Fix landed in bottlepy/bottle commit a2b0ee6bb4ce — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/bottlepy/bottle/commit/a2b0ee6bb4ce88895429ec4aca856616244c4c4c
Web page

[SECURITY] [DSA 5159-1] python-bottle security update

https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5159
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 36 Update: python-bottle-0.12.21-2.fc36 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KTLOQGMDZEPIYTFC2G53OQV2ULCGYS3F/
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 35 Update: python-bottle-0.12.21-2.fc35 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IE7U6J45PUEXIYYVWJKPM6QXIRKDK4HD/
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 3048-1] python-bottle security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/06/msg00010.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-31799(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntupython-bottle-doc (0.12.19-1+deb11u1build0.22.04.1) @ jammy2026-11-12ubuntu
ubuntupython-bottle-doc (0.12.7-1+deb8u1ubuntu0.1~esm1) @ xenial2026-11-12ubuntu
pipbottle @ 0.12.20 (fixes < 0.12.20)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(16 across 16 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.16(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-bottle—
  • every version up to 0.12.21-r0: fixed in 0.12.21-r0
—
Alpine:v3.17(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-bottle—
  • every version up to 0.12.21-r0: fixed in 0.12.21-r0
—
Alpine:v3.18(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-bottle—
  • every version up to 0.12.21-r0: fixed in 0.12.21-r0
—
Alpine:v3.19(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-bottle—
  • every version up to 0.12.21-r0: fixed in 0.12.21-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-bottle—
  • every version up to 0.12.21-r0: fixed in 0.12.21-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-bottle—
  • every version up to 0.12.21-r0: fixed in 0.12.21-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-bottle—
  • every version up to 0.12.21-r0: fixed in 0.12.21-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-bottle—
  • every version up to 0.12.21-r0: fixed in 0.12.21-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-bottle—
  • every version up to 0.12.21-r0: fixed in 0.12.21-r0
—
Debian:10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-bottle0.12.15-2, 0.12.15-2+deb10u1
  • every version up to 0.12.15-2+deb10u2: fixed in 0.12.15-2+deb10u2
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-bottle0.12.19-1
  • every version up to 0.12.19-1+deb11u1: fixed in 0.12.19-1+deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-bottle—
  • every version up to 0.12.20-1: fixed in 0.12.20-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-bottle—
  • every version up to 0.12.20-1: fixed in 0.12.20-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-bottle—
  • every version up to 0.12.20-1: fixed in 0.12.20-1
—
Debian:9(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-bottle0.12.13-1, 0.12.13-1+deb9u1
  • every version up to 0.12.13-1+deb9u2: fixed in 0.12.13-1+deb9u2
—
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
bottle0.10.1 ... 0.9.8 (74 versions)
  • every version up to 0.12.20: fixed in 0.12.20
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(2)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 62× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 285 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 185 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 00:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 00:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-12 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 82nd percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 01:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 01:52 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-12 01:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-11 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 82nd percentile
  8. 2026-11-11 03:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-11 03:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-11-10 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 82nd percentile
  11. 2026-11-10 05:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-10 05:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-11-09 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 82nd percentile
  14. 2026-11-09 07:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-09 07:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-11-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 82nd percentile
  17. 2026-11-08 09:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-08 09:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-11-07 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 82nd percentile
  20. 2026-11-07 11:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-07 11:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-11-06 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 82nd percentile
  23. 2026-11-06 12:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-06 12:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-05 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 82nd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 14:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-11-04 16:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-04 16:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-04 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 82nd percentile
  5. 2026-11-04 03:55 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-11-03 18:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-03 18:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-03 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 82nd percentile
  9. 2026-11-02 20:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-02 20:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-11-02 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 82nd percentile
  12. 2026-11-01 22:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-01 22:13 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-01 22:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-01 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 82nd percentile
  16. 2026-11-01 08:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-01 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhp9-4947-rq78 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-11-01 00:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-01 00:03 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 82nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-31 01:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-31 01:54 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-30 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  24. 2026-10-30 03:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-30 03:45 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  27. 2026-10-29 05:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-29 05:37 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  30. 2026-10-28 07:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-28 07:29 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  33. 2026-10-27 09:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-27 09:20 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-26 10:49 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-25 18:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  38. 2026-10-25 12:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-25 12:39 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  41. 2026-10-24 14:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-24 14:30 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  44. 2026-10-23 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-22 18:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-22 18:05 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-22 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  48. 2026-10-21 19:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-21 19:50 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  51. 2026-10-20 21:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-20 21:41 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  54. 2026-10-19 23:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  56. 2026-10-18 22:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-18 22:51 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  59. 2026-10-18 08:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-17 23:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-17 23:54 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  63. 2026-10-17 01:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-17 01:43 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-16 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  66. 2026-10-16 02:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  68. 2026-10-14 21:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  70. 2026-10-13 17:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  72. 2026-10-12 18:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  74. 2026-10-11 23:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-31799?
CVE-2022-31799 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 2, 2022. Bottle before 0.12.20 mishandles errors during early request binding.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-31799 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2022-31799 was published on June 2, 2022. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2022-31799 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-31799 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (82nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-31799?
CVE-2022-31799 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-31799?
A fix for CVE-2022-31799 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2022-31799 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-31799

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-31799?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.