CVE-2022-30216

CRITICALNVD 8.89.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicted 88% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.

Triggered by: EPSS exploit prediction (continuous uplift above 30%)
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2022-35422 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 88%
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 88%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Windows Server Service Tampering Vulnerability

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
75
EG Risk 75/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation88% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
88%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is EPSS's lift toward 9.0 from its impact severity (EG Severity, CVSS 8.8 HIGH): a likelihood of exploitation, not impact.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
88% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 12, 2022

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Aug 16, 2026
Patch available. Sources: microsoft.
MicrosoftMentions a patch (unverified)

Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center

https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-30216

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-30216(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 59× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 191 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 91 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 12:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 12:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  3. 2026-11-12 11:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-12 11:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  5. 2026-11-11 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-11-11 11:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-11 11:45 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-11 11:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  9. 2026-11-10 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-11-10 11:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-10 11:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  12. 2026-11-09 11:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-09 11:19 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-09 11:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  15. 2026-11-08 11:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-08 11:07 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-11-08 11:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  18. 2026-11-07 10:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-07 10:54 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-07 10:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  21. 2026-11-06 10:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-06 10:42 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-06 10:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  24. 2026-11-05 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  25. 2026-11-05 10:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 10:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  2. 2026-11-04 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  3. 2026-11-04 10:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-04 10:17 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-04 10:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  6. 2026-11-03 10:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-03 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  8. 2026-11-02 09:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-02 09:47 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-02 09:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  11. 2026-11-01 09:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-01 09:35 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-01 09:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  14. 2026-10-31 09:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-31 09:22 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-31 09:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  17. 2026-10-30 09:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-30 09:10 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-30 09:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  20. 2026-10-29 08:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-29 08:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  22. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-10-28 08:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-28 08:46 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-28 08:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  26. 2026-10-27 08:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-27 08:03 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-27 08:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  29. 2026-10-26 05:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  30. 2026-10-25 18:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  32. 2026-10-25 05:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-25 05:19 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-25 05:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  35. 2026-10-24 05:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-24 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  37. 2026-10-23 04:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-23 04:53 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-23 04:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  40. 2026-10-22 04:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-22 04:41 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-22 04:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  43. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  44. 2026-10-21 04:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-21 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  46. 2026-10-20 04:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-20 04:11 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-20 04:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  49. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  50. 2026-10-19 03:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-19 03:55 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-19 03:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  53. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  54. 2026-10-18 03:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-18 03:40 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-18 03:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  57. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  58. 2026-10-17 03:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-17 03:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  60. 2026-10-16 03:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-16 03:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  62. 2026-10-14 23:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-14 23:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  64. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  65. 2026-10-13 18:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-13 18:58 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-13 18:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  68. 2026-10-12 18:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-12 18:38 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-12 18:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gpxc-hjqg-f39p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  71. 2026-10-11 23:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  73. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  74. 2026-09-30 15:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-30216?
CVE-2022-30216 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 12, 2022. Windows Server Service Tampering Vulnerability
When was CVE-2022-30216 made public?
CVE-2022-30216 was made public on July 12, 2022: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Microsoft Corporation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on July 12, 2022. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2022-30216 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-30216 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 88% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-30216?
CVE-2022-30216 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-30216?
A fix for CVE-2022-30216 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2022-30216 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-30216

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-30216?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.