CVE-2021-4044

HIGHNVD 7.58.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score elevated to 8.0 because EPSS predicts 50% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (top 1.2% of all CVEs). NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.

Triggered by: EPSS exploit prediction ≥85%
Sources: epss, nvd
Elevated
8.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch this weekExploitation is likely or a public exploit exists.
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 50%
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 50%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: Elevated riskExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Internally libssl in OpenSSL calls X509_verify_cert() on the client side to verify a certificate supplied by a server. That function may return a negative return value to indicate an internal error (for example out of memory). Such a negative return value is mishandled by OpenSSL and will cause an IO function (such as SSL_connect() or SSL_do_handshake()) to not indicate success and a subsequent call to SSL_get_error() to return the value SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY. This return value is only supposed to be returned by OpenSSL if the application has previously called SSL_CTX_set_cert_verify_callback(). Since most applications do not do this the SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY return value from SSL_get_error() will be totally unexpected and applications may not behave correctly as a result. The exact behaviour will depend on the application but it could result in crashes, infinite loops or other similar incorrect responses. This issue is made more serious in combination with a separate bug in OpenSSL 3.0 that will cause X509_verify_cert() to indicate an internal error when processing a certificate chain. This will occur where a certificate does not include the Subject Alternative Name extension but where a Certificate Authority has enforced name constraints. This issue can occur even with valid chains. By combining the two issues an attacker could induce incorrect, application dependent behaviour. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0).

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
8.0(high)
EG Risk
61(Track)
EG Risk 61/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity80% × 45%
Exploitation50% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
50%
EPSS %ILE
99%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 14, 2021

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
crates.io(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl-src300.0.4

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 31× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-23 02:04 UTCEG score recompute 0.50
  7. 2026-07-22 22:50 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-18 10:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-18 05:59 UTCOSV refresh
  14. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 58 more
  1. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-30 02:30 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-15 17:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-12 15:10 UTCOSV refresh
  29. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-10 22:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-10 13:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-05-29 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-26 06:24 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-05-24 11:51 UTCOSV refresh

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-4044?
CVE-2021-4044 is a high vulnerability published on December 14, 2021. Internally libssl in OpenSSL calls X509verifycert() on the client side to verify a certificate supplied by a server. That function may return a negative return value to indicate an internal error (for example out of memory). Such a negative return value is mishandled by OpenSSL and will cause an IO…
When was CVE-2021-4044 disclosed?
CVE-2021-4044 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 14, 2021, with the most recent update on November 21, 2024. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2021-4044 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-4044 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 50% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 1.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-4044?
CVE-2021-4044 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 8.0.
How do I remediate CVE-2021-4044?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2021-4044, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-4044

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-4044?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.