CVE-2021-31800

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2021-06-18. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2021-0100 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-mj63-64x7-57xf (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2021-17 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 19%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Multiple path traversal vulnerabilities exist in smbserver.py in Impacket through 0.9.22. An attacker that connects to a running smbserver instance can list and write to arbitrary files via ../ directory traversal. This could potentially be abused to achieve arbitrary code execution by replacing /etc/shadow or an SSH authorized key.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
19%
EPSS %ILE
97th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
19% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-13). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 5, 2021

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (9)

Auto-updated Oct 3, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit.
Web page

impacket/impacket/smbserver.py at cb6d43a677c338db930bc4e9161620832c1ec624 · fortra/impacket · GitHub

https://github.com/SecureAuthCorp/impacket/blob/cb6d43a677c338db930bc4e9161620832c1ec624/impacket/smbserver.py#L2008
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 34 Update: python-impacket-0.9.22-3.fc34 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UF56LYB27LHEIFJTFHU3M75NMNNK2SCG/
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 32 Update: python-impacket-0.9.22-3.fc32 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KRV2C5DATXBHG6TF6CEEX54KZ75THQS3/
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 33 Update: python-impacket-0.9.22-3.fc33 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IPXDPWCAPVX3UWYZ3N2T5OLBSBBUHJP6/
Web page

Releases · fortra/impacket · GitHub

https://github.com/SecureAuthCorp/impacket/releases
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 49c643bf6662 (SecureAuthCorp/impacket)

Patch available: SecureAuthCorp/impacket impacket_0_9_23 (contains commit 49c643bf6662)

https://github.com/SecureAuthCorp/impacket/commit/49c643bf66620646884ed141c94e5fdd85bcdd2f
Web page

impacket/impacket/smbserver.py at cb6d43a677c338db930bc4e9161620832c1ec624 · fortra/impacket · GitHub

https://github.com/SecureAuthCorp/impacket/blob/cb6d43a677c338db930bc4e9161620832c1ec624/impacket/smbserver.py#L876
Web page

impacket/impacket/smbserver.py at cb6d43a677c338db930bc4e9161620832c1ec624 · fortra/impacket · GitHub

https://github.com/SecureAuthCorp/impacket/blob/cb6d43a677c338db930bc4e9161620832c1ec624/impacket/smbserver.py#L3485
Web page

impacket/impacket/smbserver.py at cb6d43a677c338db930bc4e9161620832c1ec624 · fortra/impacket · GitHub

https://github.com/SecureAuthCorp/impacket/blob/cb6d43a677c338db930bc4e9161620832c1ec624/impacket/smbserver.py#L2958

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2021-31800(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
pipimpacket @ 0.9.23 (fixes < 0.9.23)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(16 across 16 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.23-r0: fixed in 0.9.23-r0
—
Alpine:v3.15(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.23-r0: fixed in 0.9.23-r0
—
Alpine:v3.16(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.23-r0: fixed in 0.9.23-r0
—
Alpine:v3.17(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.23-r0: fixed in 0.9.23-r0
—
Alpine:v3.18(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.23-r0: fixed in 0.9.23-r0
—
Alpine:v3.19(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.23-r0: fixed in 0.9.23-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.23-r0: fixed in 0.9.23-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.23-r0: fixed in 0.9.23-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.23-r0: fixed in 0.9.23-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.23-r0: fixed in 0.9.23-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.23-r0: fixed in 0.9.23-r0
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.22-2: fixed in 0.9.22-2
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.22-2: fixed in 0.9.22-2
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.22-2: fixed in 0.9.22-2
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
impacket—
  • every version up to 0.9.22-2: fixed in 0.9.22-2
—
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
impacket0.9.10 ... 0.9.22 (12 versions)
  • every version up to 0.9.23: fixed in 0.9.23
  • 0.9.10 up to 0.9.23: fixed in 0.9.23
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 251 rows on record for this CVE, as 99 entries (1 repeat merged).

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 151 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 21:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 21:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mj63-64x7-57xf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-13 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 18:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 18:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mj63-64x7-57xf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-12 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  7. 2026-11-11 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  8. 2026-11-11 16:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-11 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mj63-64x7-57xf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-11-10 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  11. 2026-11-10 14:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-10 14:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mj63-64x7-57xf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-11-09 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  14. 2026-11-09 11:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-09 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mj63-64x7-57xf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-11-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  17. 2026-11-08 09:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-08 09:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mj63-64x7-57xf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-11-07 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  20. 2026-11-07 07:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-07 07:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mj63-64x7-57xf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-11-06 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  23. 2026-11-06 05:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-06 05:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mj63-64x7-57xf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-05 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-11-05 02:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-05 02:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mj63-64x7-57xf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-04 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  4. 2026-11-04 00:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-04 00:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mj63-64x7-57xf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-03 17:55 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-11-03 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  8. 2026-11-02 22:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-02 22:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mj63-64x7-57xf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-11-02 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  11. 2026-11-01 19:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-01 19:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mj63-64x7-57xf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-11-01 08:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mj63-64x7-57xf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-11-01 08:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-31 17:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  17. 2026-10-30 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  18. 2026-10-30 15:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  20. 2026-10-29 13:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 10:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  24. 2026-10-27 07:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-25 18:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  27. 2026-10-25 00:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  29. 2026-10-23 22:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  31. 2026-10-22 20:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  33. 2026-10-21 18:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  35. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  36. 2026-10-20 15:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  38. 2026-10-19 13:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  40. 2026-10-18 09:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  42. 2026-10-17 07:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-16 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  44. 2026-10-16 05:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  46. 2026-10-15 03:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  48. 2026-10-13 23:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  50. 2026-10-12 19:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-11 23:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  53. 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  54. 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  55. 2026-10-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  56. 2026-10-07 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  57. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  58. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  59. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  60. 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  61. 2026-10-01 19:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  62. 2026-09-30 15:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  64. 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  65. 2026-09-28 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  66. 2026-09-27 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  67. 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  68. 2026-09-26 03:15 UTCOSV refresh
  69. 2026-09-26 00:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  70. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  71. 2026-09-23 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  72. 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  73. 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  74. 2026-09-20 20:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(2 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (2 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCLouzogh/CVE-2021-31800
    Published Sep 2, 2022

    CVE-2021-31800 POC

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCp0dalirius/CVE-2021-31800-Impacket-SMB-Server-Arbitrary-file-read-write
    Published Aug 28, 2022

    A path traversal in smbserver.py allows an attacker to read/write arbitrary files on the server.

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-31800?
CVE-2021-31800 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 5, 2021. Multiple path traversal vulnerabilities exist in smbserver.py in Impacket through 0.9.22. An attacker that connects to a running smbserver instance can list and write to arbitrary files via ../ directory traversal. This could potentially be abused to achieve arbitrary code execution by replacing…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-31800 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2021-31800 was published on May 5, 2021. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2021-31800 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-31800 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 19% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (97th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-31800?
CVE-2021-31800 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2021-31800?
A fix for CVE-2021-31800 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2021-31800 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-31800

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-31800?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.