CVE-2021-23017

CRITICALNVD 7.79.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2022-05-24. NVD baseline CVSS 7.7; sources differ by 1.7.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2021-10135 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • 357 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running an affected version — derived from Shodan data (© Shodan); a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 53%
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 53%CVSS: 7.7Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: 357

A fix is available — apply it.

A security issue in nginx resolver was identified, which might allow an attacker who is able to forge UDP packets from the DNS server to cause 1-byte memory overwrite, resulting in worker process crash or potential other impact.

Internet exposure · derived from Shodan data

357 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running a version that maps to CVE-2021-23017, in our KEV-Exposure radar’s Shodan-derived sample.

across 49 hosting countries (United States, China, Germany, United Kingdom, France)top: nginx
See the KEV-Exposure radar →Derived from Shodan data. Shodan data is owned by Shodan, which holds its copyright (© Shodan). EchelonGraph claims no ownership of it or copyright in it. Aggregate, host-redacted.

How it counts: every 12 hours, when Shodan query credits allow, the radar runs one Shodan query per tracked product, reads up to 100 ip:port services per query, and keeps a service when its banner version matches a CISA-KEV or high-EPSS CVE; a service is dropped when neither a search nor a Shodan InternetDB port re-check has refreshed it for 21 days. A re-check that finds the port still listed by Shodan InternetDB refreshes the service without re-reading the banner, so a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open. A count is a banner-version inference over a sample, not an exploit test and not an internet-wide census, and the unit is a service, not a machine: a machine answering on two ports counts twice.

CVSS v3
7.7
EG Score
9.4CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
64
EG Risk 64/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity94% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation53% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
53%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.4 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
53% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 1, 2021

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (10)

Auto-updated Oct 13, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 33 Update: nginx-1.20.1-2.fc33 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GNKOP2JR5L7KCIZTJRZDCUPJTUONMC5I/
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 34 Update: nginx-1.20.1-2.fc34 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7SFVYHC7OXTEO4SMBWXDVK6E5IMEYMEE/
Web page

[nginx-announce] nginx security advisory (CVE-2021-23017)

http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-announce/2021/000300.html

Patch Availability(12)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntunginx-light (1.10.3-0ubuntu0.16.04.5+esm1) @ xenial2026-11-12ubuntu
ubuntulibnginx-mod-rtmp (1.18.0-6ubuntu2.2) @ groovy2026-11-12ubuntu
redhatnginx:1.20-8050020211221125012.c53685002022-01-31redhat
redhatrhacm2/management-ingress-rhel7:v2.3.3-32021-10-20redhat
redhat3scale-amp2/zync-rhel8:1.14.0-32021-10-14redhat
redhatrhacm2/acm-must-gather-rhel8:v2.1.11-22021-09-23redhat
redhatansible-tower-38/ansible-tower-rhel7:3.8.4-12021-09-08redhat
redhatpython-pulpcore-0:3.7.6-1.el8pc2021-07-29redhat
redhatnginx:1.16-8020020210526102648.4cda2c842021-06-08redhat
redhatrh-nginx116-nginx-1:1.16.1-6.el72021-06-07redhat
redhatnginx:1.18-8040020210526100943.522a0ee42021-06-07redhat
redhatrh-nginx118-nginx-1:1.18.0-3.el72021-06-07redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(21 across 21 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.16.1-r3: fixed in 1.16.1-r3
—
Alpine:v3.11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.16.1-r7: fixed in 1.16.1-r7
—
Alpine:v3.12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.18.0-r2: fixed in 1.18.0-r2
—
Alpine:v3.13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.18.0-r14: fixed in 1.18.0-r14
—
Alpine:v3.14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.20.1-r0: fixed in 1.20.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.15(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.20.1-r0: fixed in 1.20.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.16(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.20.1-r0: fixed in 1.20.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.17(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.20.1-r0: fixed in 1.20.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.18(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.20.1-r0: fixed in 1.20.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.19(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.20.1-r0: fixed in 1.20.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.20.1-r0: fixed in 1.20.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.20.1-r0: fixed in 1.20.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.20.1-r0: fixed in 1.20.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.20.1-r0: fixed in 1.20.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • 0.6.18 up to 1.20.1-r0: fixed in 1.20.1-r0
—
Debian:10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx1.14.2-2, 1.14.2-2+deb10u1, 1.14.2-2+deb10u2, 1.14.2-2+deb10u3
  • every version up to 1.14.2-2+deb10u4: fixed in 1.14.2-2+deb10u4
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • every version up to 1.18.0-6.1: fixed in 1.18.0-6.1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • every version up to 1.18.0-6.1: fixed in 1.18.0-6.1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • every version up to 1.18.0-6.1: fixed in 1.18.0-6.1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx—
  • every version up to 1.18.0-6.1: fixed in 1.18.0-6.1
—
Debian:9(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nginx1.10.3-1 ... 1.10.3-1+deb9u5 (8 versions)
  • every version up to 1.10.3-1+deb9u6: fixed in 1.10.3-1+deb9u6
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(3)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 79× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 261 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 161 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 99th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 14:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 14:32 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-12 14:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  5. 2026-11-11 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-11-11 12:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-11 12:30 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-11 12:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  9. 2026-11-10 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  10. 2026-11-10 10:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-10 10:28 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-10 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  13. 2026-11-09 08:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-09 08:25 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-09 08:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  16. 2026-11-08 06:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-08 06:23 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-08 06:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  19. 2026-11-07 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  20. 2026-11-07 04:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-07 04:21 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-07 04:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  23. 2026-11-06 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  24. 2026-11-06 02:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-06 02:13 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-06 02:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  2. 2026-11-05 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  3. 2026-11-05 00:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-05 00:11 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-05 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  6. 2026-11-04 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  7. 2026-11-03 22:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-03 22:08 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-11-03 22:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  10. 2026-11-03 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  11. 2026-11-03 15:55 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-11-02 20:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-02 20:03 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-02 20:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  15. 2026-11-01 18:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-01 18:00 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-11-01 18:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  18. 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  19. 2026-10-31 15:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-31 15:58 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-31 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  22. 2026-10-30 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  23. 2026-10-30 13:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-30 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-30 13:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  26. 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  27. 2026-10-29 11:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-29 11:55 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-29 11:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  30. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  31. 2026-10-28 09:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-28 09:50 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-28 09:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  34. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  35. 2026-10-27 06:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-27 06:57 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-27 06:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  38. 2026-10-26 01:41 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-26 01:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  40. 2026-10-25 18:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  42. 2026-10-24 23:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-24 23:37 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-24 23:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  45. 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  46. 2026-10-23 21:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-23 21:36 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-23 21:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  49. 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  50. 2026-10-22 19:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-22 19:30 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-22 19:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  53. 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  54. 2026-10-21 17:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-21 17:29 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-21 17:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  57. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  58. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  59. 2026-10-20 15:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-20 15:24 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-20 15:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  62. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  63. 2026-10-19 13:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-19 13:20 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-19 13:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  66. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  67. 2026-10-18 11:18 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-18 11:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  69. 2026-10-18 09:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-17 07:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-10-17 07:16 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-17 07:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-83p9-mcpm-374v · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  73. 2026-10-16 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  74. 2026-10-16 05:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-16 05:12 UTCVendor advisory

Publicly available exploits

(2 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry, 1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-50973
    Published Jul 11, 2022

    Nginx 1.20.0 - Denial of Service (DOS)

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCM507/CVE-2021-23017-PoC
    Published Jun 30, 2022

    PoC for Nginx 0.6.18 - 1.20.0 Memory Overwrite Vulnerability CVE-2021-23017

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2021-23017?
CVE-2021-23017 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 1, 2021. A security issue in nginx resolver was identified, which might allow an attacker who is able to forge UDP packets from the DNS server to cause 1-byte memory overwrite, resulting in worker process crash or potential other impact.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-23017 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2021-23017 was published on June 1, 2021. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2021-23017 actively exploited?
CVE-2021-23017 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 53% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-23017?
CVE-2021-23017 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.7 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.4 (CRITICAL).
How do I remediate CVE-2021-23017?
A fix for CVE-2021-23017 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2021-23017 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-23017

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-23017?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.