CVE-2020-8794

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2022-05-24. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Weaponized

Also known asEUVD-2020-29642 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 89%
  • Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, Exploit-DB, marked verified by Exploit-DB, other public proof-of-concept code)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 89%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Metasploit · Exploit-DB (verified) · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

OpenSMTPD before 6.6.4 allows remote code execution because of an out-of-bounds read in mta_io in mta_session.c for multi-line replies. Although this vulnerability affects the client side of OpenSMTPD, it is possible to attack a server because the server code launches the client code during bounce handling.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
80
EG Risk 80/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation89% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
89%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
89% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 25, 2020

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (9)

Auto-updated Oct 4, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

OpenBSD: Security

https://www.openbsd.org/security.html
Web page

[SECURITY] [DSA 4634-1] opensmtpd security update

https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4634
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 32 Update: opensmtpd-6.6.4p1-2.fc32 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OPH4QU4DNVHA7ACFXMYFCEP5PSXXPN4E/
Web page

oss-security - 21Nails: Multiple vulnerabilities in Exim

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/05/04/7
Web page

oss-security - Re: LPE and RCE in OpenSMTPD's default install (CVE-2020-8794)

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/03/01/2
Web page

oss-security - Re: LPE and RCE in OpenSMTPD's default install (CVE-2020-8794)

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/03/01/1
Web page

oss-security - Re: LPE and RCE in OpenSMTPD's default install (CVE-2020-8794)

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/02/26/1
Web page

Full Disclosure: LPE and RCE in OpenSMTPD's default install (CVE-2020-8794)

http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Feb/32

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuopensmtpd (6.0.3p1-6ubuntu0.2) @ eoan2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntuopensmtpd (5.4.1p1-1ubuntu0.1~esm1) @ trusty2026-11-03ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(14 across 14 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd-extras—
  • every version up to 6.6.4-r0: fixed in 6.6.4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd-extras—
  • every version up to 6.6.4-r0: fixed in 6.6.4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.15(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd-extras—
  • every version up to 6.6.4-r0: fixed in 6.6.4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.16(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd-extras—
  • every version up to 6.6.4-r0: fixed in 6.6.4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.17(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd-extras—
  • every version up to 6.6.4-r0: fixed in 6.6.4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.18(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd-extras—
  • every version up to 6.6.4-r0: fixed in 6.6.4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.19(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd-extras—
  • every version up to 6.6.4-r0: fixed in 6.6.4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd-extras—
  • every version up to 6.6.4-r0: fixed in 6.6.4-r0
—
Debian:10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd6.0.3p1-5, 6.0.3p1-5+deb10u1, 6.0.3p1-5+deb10u2, 6.0.3p1-5+deb10u3
  • every version up to 6.0.3p1-5+deb10u4: fixed in 6.0.3p1-5+deb10u4
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd—
  • every version up to 6.6.4p1-1: fixed in 6.6.4p1-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd—
  • every version up to 6.6.4p1-1: fixed in 6.6.4p1-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd—
  • every version up to 6.6.4p1-1: fixed in 6.6.4p1-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd—
  • every version up to 6.6.4p1-1: fixed in 6.6.4p1-1
—
Debian:9(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
opensmtpd6.0.2p1-2, 6.0.2p1-2+deb9u1, 6.0.2p1-2+deb9u2
  • every version up to 6.0.2p1-2+deb9u3: fixed in 6.0.2p1-2+deb9u3
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(2)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 57× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 173 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 73 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 11:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 11:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-12 12:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-12 12:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-11-11 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-11-11 14:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-11 14:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-10 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-11-10 15:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-11-09 17:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-09 17:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-08 19:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-08 19:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-11-07 20:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-07 20:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-11-06 22:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-06 22:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-11-05 23:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-05 23:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-11-05 01:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-05 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-11-04 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-11-04 03:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-04 03:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-03 14:25 UTCOSV refresh
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-03 04:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-03 04:41 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-03 04:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-02 06:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-02 06:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-01 07:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-01 07:53 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-01 07:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-10-31 09:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-10-31 09:30 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-31 09:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-10-30 11:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-30 11:06 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-30 11:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-10-29 12:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-29 12:43 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-29 12:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-10-28 14:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-28 14:21 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-28 14:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-27 15:39 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-27 15:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-26 17:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-26 17:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-25 18:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-25 18:32 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-25 18:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  30. 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  31. 2026-10-24 20:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-24 20:08 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-24 20:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  34. 2026-10-23 21:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-23 21:46 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-23 21:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  37. 2026-10-22 23:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-22 23:21 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-22 23:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  40. 2026-10-22 00:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-22 00:59 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-22 00:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  43. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  44. 2026-10-21 02:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-21 02:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  46. 2026-10-20 03:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-20 03:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  48. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  49. 2026-10-19 04:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-19 04:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  51. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  52. 2026-10-18 06:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-18 06:08 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-18 06:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-10-17 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  56. 2026-10-17 07:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-17 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  58. 2026-10-16 09:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-16 09:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  60. 2026-10-15 08:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-15 08:49 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-15 08:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  64. 2026-10-14 05:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-14 05:05 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-14 05:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  67. 2026-10-13 00:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hmw3-c3g9-px9f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-10-12 19:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-11 23:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  71. 2026-10-06 15:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  72. 2026-09-30 15:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  74. 2026-09-27 09:32 UTCOSV refresh
  75. 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(3 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 2 Exploit-DB entries). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-48185✓ verified
    Published Mar 9, 2020

    OpenSMTPD - OOB Read Local Privilege Escalation (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/unix/local/opensmtpd_oob_read_lpe✓ verified
    Published Mar 4, 2020

    OpenSMTPD OOB Read Local Privilege Escalation

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-48140
    Published Feb 26, 2020

    OpenSMTPD < 6.6.3p1 - Local Privilege Escalation + Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2020-8794?
CVE-2020-8794 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 25, 2020. OpenSMTPD before 6.6.4 allows remote code execution because of an out-of-bounds read in mta_io in mta_session.c for multi-line replies. Although this vulnerability affects the client side of OpenSMTPD, it is possible to attack a server because the server code launches the client code during bounce…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2020-8794 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2020-8794 was published on February 25, 2020. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2020-8794 actively exploited?
CVE-2020-8794 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: a Metasploit module exists for it, and Exploit-DB marks a public exploit for it as verified. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 89% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-8794?
CVE-2020-8794 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2020-8794?
A fix for CVE-2020-8794 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2020-8794

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-8794?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.