Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses) the name of a TSIG key used by the server. Since BIND, by default, configures a local session key even on servers whose configuration does not otherwise make use of it, almost all current BIND servers are vulnerable. In releases of BIND dating from March 2018 and after, an assertion check in tsig.c detects this inconsistent state and deliberately exits. Prior to the introduction of the check the server would continue operating in an inconsistent state, with potentially harmful results.
CVE-2020-8617
Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicts 93% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (top 0.2% of all CVEs). NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 93%
- Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, epss top5pct, epss high, public exploit)
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 9.0(high)
- EG Risk
- 82(Track)EG Risk 82/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity90% × 45%Exploitation93% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 93%
- EPSS %ILE
- 100%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
May 19, 2020
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
References (24)
- security-officer@ischttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00041.html
- security-officer@ischttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00044.html
- security-officer@ischttp://packetstormsecurity.com/files/157836/BIND-TSIG-Denial-Of-Service.html
- security-officer@ischttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/05/19/4
- security-officer@ischttps://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2020-8617
- security-officer@ischttps://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/05/msg00031.html
- security-officer@ischttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JKJXVBOKZ36ER3EUCR7VRB7WGHIIMPNJ/
- security-officer@ischttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WOGCJS2XQ3SQNF4W6GLZ73LWZJ6ZZWZI/
- security-officer@ischttps://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200522-0002/
- security-officer@ischttps://usn.ubuntu.com/4365-1/
- security-officer@ischttps://usn.ubuntu.com/4365-2/
- security-officer@ischttps://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4689
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00041.html
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00044.html
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/157836/BIND-TSIG-Denial-Of-Service.html
Patch Availability(14)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | bind9-host (1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm2) @ trusty | 2026-05-23 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | dnsutils (1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.1) @ focal | 2026-05-23 | ubuntu |
| redhat | bind-32:9.9.4-29.el7_2.9 | 2020-08-18 | redhat |
| redhat | bind-32:9.9.4-74.el7_6.4 | 2020-08-18 | redhat |
| redhat | bind-32:9.9.4-50.el7_3.4 | 2020-08-18 | redhat |
| redhat | bind-32:9.9.4-51.el7_4.4 | 2020-08-12 | redhat |
| redhat | bind-32:9.8.2-0.23.rc1.el6_5.9 | 2020-08-10 | redhat |
| redhat | bind-32:9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.11 | 2020-08-10 | redhat |
| redhat | bind-32:9.11.4-9.P2.el7_7.1 | 2020-07-13 | redhat |
| redhat | bind-32:9.11.4-19.P2.el8_0 | 2020-06-04 | redhat |
| redhat | bind-32:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.7 | 2020-06-03 | redhat |
| redhat | bind-32:9.11.4-16.P2.el7_8.6 | 2020-06-01 | redhat |
| redhat | bind-32:9.11.4-26.P2.el8_1.3 | 2020-06-01 | redhat |
| redhat | bind-32:9.11.13-5.el8_2 | 2020-05-28 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(14)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
- Red HatRHSA-2020:2338IMPORTANT2020-05-19
RHSA-2020:2338 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:2344IMPORTANT2020-05-19
RHSA-2020:2344 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:2345IMPORTANT2020-05-19
RHSA-2020:2345 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:2383IMPORTANT2020-05-19
RHSA-2020:2383 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:2404IMPORTANT2020-05-19
RHSA-2020:2404 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:2893IMPORTANT2020-05-19
RHSA-2020:2893 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:3378IMPORTANT2020-05-19
RHSA-2020:3378 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:3379IMPORTANT2020-05-19
RHSA-2020:3379 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:3433IMPORTANT2020-05-19
RHSA-2020:3433 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:3470IMPORTANT2020-05-19
RHSA-2020:3470 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:3471IMPORTANT2020-05-19
RHSA-2020:3471 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:3475IMPORTANT2020-05-19
RHSA-2020:3475 — Important
- UbuntuUSN-4365-1MEDIUM
Bind vulnerabilities
- UbuntuUSN-4365-2MEDIUM
Bind vulnerabilities
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 14× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-23 01:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 21:29 UTCEG score recompute▲ 3.10
- 2026-07-22 21:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-22 21:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 21:07 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 06:50 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-15 17:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 21 moreShow fewer
- 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 13:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-07 10:29 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-29 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-23 03:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-23 03:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-23 03:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
Publicly available exploits
(3 references)Working exploit code is in the public domain (1 Metasploit module) (1 GitHub PoC) (1 Exploit-DB entry). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.
- Exploit-DBEDB-48521First seen May 20, 2020
BIND - 'TSIG' Denial of Service
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCknqyf263/CVE-2020-8617First seen May 20, 2020
PoC for CVE-2020-8617 (BIND)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitauxiliary/dos/dns/bind_tsig_badtime✓ verifiedFirst seen May 19, 2020
BIND TSIG Badtime Query Denial of Service
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat
- CVE-2001-0825EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2001-1009EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2001-0554EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2001-1162EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0414EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2001-0191EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2001-0301EG 10.0EPSS p90HIGH
- CVE-2001-0197EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0233EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0010EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-617
- CVE-2006-5779NVD 7.5EG 8.7EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2018-5740NVD 7.5EG 8.3EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2018-19963EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2017-7605EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2018-12543NVD 7.5EG 7.7EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2016-8864NVD 7.5EG 7.7EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2019-14022EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2015-8012EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2011-3596EG 7.5EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2018-5742EG 7.5HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2020-8617?
When was CVE-2020-8617 disclosed?
Is CVE-2020-8617 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-8617?
How do I remediate CVE-2020-8617?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2020-8617
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-8617?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.