CVE-2020-5398

CRITICALNVD 7.59.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicted 88% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.

Triggered by: EPSS exploit prediction (continuous uplift above 30%)
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2020-0259 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-8wx2-9q48-vm9r (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 88%
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 88%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a "Content-Disposition" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
69
EG Risk 69/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation88% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
88%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is EPSS's lift toward 9.0 from its impact severity (EG Severity, CVSS 7.5 HIGH): a likelihood of exploitation, not impact.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
88% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

January 17, 2020

Last Modified

October 8, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2020-5398(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatspringframework2020-12-16redhat
mavenorg.springframework:spring-webflux @ 5.2.3.RELEASE (fixes >= 5.2.0.RELEASE, < 5.2.3.RELEASE)—ghsa
mavenorg.springframework:spring-webflux @ 5.1.13.RELEASE (fixes >= 5.1.0.RELEASE, < 5.1.13.RELEASE)—ghsa
mavenorg.springframework:spring-webflux @ 5.0.16.RELEASE (fixes >= 5.0.0.RELEASE, < 5.0.16.RELEASE)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.springframework:spring-webflux5.0.0.RELEASE ... 5.0.9.RELEASE (16 versions)
  • 5.2.0.RELEASE up to 5.2.3.RELEASE: fixed in 5.2.3.RELEASE
  • 5.1.0.RELEASE up to 5.1.13.RELEASE: fixed in 5.1.13.RELEASE
  • 5.0.0.RELEASE up to 5.0.16.RELEASE: fixed in 5.0.16.RELEASE
—
org.springframework:spring-webmvc5.0.0.RELEASE ... 5.0.9.RELEASE (16 versions)
  • 5.2.0.RELEASE up to 5.2.3.RELEASE: fixed in 5.2.3.RELEASE
  • 5.1.0.RELEASE up to 5.1.13.RELEASE: fixed in 5.1.13.RELEASE
  • 5.0.0.RELEASE up to 5.0.16.RELEASE: fixed in 5.0.16.RELEASE
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 51× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 154 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 54 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 02:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 02:44 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-13 02:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8wx2-9q48-vm9r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  4. 2026-11-12 01:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 01:14 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-12 01:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8wx2-9q48-vm9r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  7. 2026-11-11 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-11-10 23:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-10 23:41 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-10 23:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8wx2-9q48-vm9r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  11. 2026-11-09 22:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-09 22:12 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-09 22:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8wx2-9q48-vm9r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  14. 2026-11-09 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-11-08 20:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-08 20:37 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-11-08 20:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8wx2-9q48-vm9r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  18. 2026-11-07 19:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-07 19:08 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-07 19:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8wx2-9q48-vm9r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  21. 2026-11-06 17:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-06 17:33 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-06 17:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8wx2-9q48-vm9r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  24. 2026-11-05 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  25. 2026-11-05 15:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 15:58 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-05 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8wx2-9q48-vm9r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  3. 2026-11-04 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-11-04 14:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-04 14:28 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-04 14:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8wx2-9q48-vm9r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  7. 2026-11-03 13:25 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-11-03 12:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-03 12:57 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-03 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8wx2-9q48-vm9r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  11. 2026-11-02 11:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-02 11:27 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-02 11:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8wx2-9q48-vm9r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  14. 2026-11-01 09:57 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-01 09:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8wx2-9q48-vm9r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  16. 2026-11-01 08:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8wx2-9q48-vm9r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  17. 2026-11-01 08:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-31 08:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-31 08:28 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-30 06:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-30 06:58 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-10-29 05:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-29 05:29 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-28 04:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-28 04:00 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-27 02:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-27 02:17 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-25 20:43 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-25 18:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  32. 2026-10-24 19:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-24 19:13 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-23 17:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-23 17:44 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-22 16:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-22 16:13 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  39. 2026-10-21 14:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-21 14:05 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  42. 2026-10-20 12:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-20 12:31 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-19 11:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-19 11:00 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-18 07:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-18 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-17 06:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-17 06:19 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-16 04:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-16 04:50 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-15 03:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-15 03:14 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  55. 2026-10-13 23:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-13 23:26 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  58. 2026-10-12 19:34 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-12 19:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-11 23:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-08 22:30 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-08 21:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-08 21:34 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-07 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  65. 2026-09-30 15:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  67. 2026-09-27 11:37 UTCOSV refresh
  68. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  69. 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  70. 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  71. 2026-09-19 15:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  72. 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  73. 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  74. 2026-09-07 21:18 UTCOSV refresh
  75. 2026-09-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCmotikan2010/CVE-2020-5398
    Published Jan 17, 2020

    CVE-2020-5398 - RFD(Reflected File Download) Attack for Spring MVC

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2020-5398?
CVE-2020-5398 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 17, 2020. In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a "Content-Disposition" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from…
When was CVE-2020-5398 made public?
CVE-2020-5398 was made public on January 16, 2020: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, pivotal, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on January 17, 2020. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 8, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2020-5398 actively exploited?
CVE-2020-5398 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 88% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-5398?
CVE-2020-5398 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
How do I remediate CVE-2020-5398?
A fix for CVE-2020-5398 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2020-5398 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2020-5398

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-5398?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.