CVE-2020-11651

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-11-03), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Exploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2020-0171 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-pjhf-vpx3-33r3 (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2020-102 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 97%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Metasploit · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

An issue was discovered in SaltStack Salt before 2019.2.4 and 3000 before 3000.2. The salt-master process ClearFuncs class does not properly validate method calls. This allows a remote user to access some methods without authentication. These methods can be used to retrieve user tokens from the salt master and/or run arbitrary commands on salt minions.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
99
EG Risk 99/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
EPSS PROB
97%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
97% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-13). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.

A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-11651

Published

April 30, 2020

Last Modified

November 7, 2025

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Nov 13, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available.
Web page

SaltStack FrameWork Vulnerabilities Affecting Cisco Products

https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-salt-2vx545AG
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 2223-1] salt security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/05/msg00027.html
Web page

salt/doc/topics/releases/3000.2.rst at v3000.2_docs · saltstack/salt · GitHub

https://github.com/saltstack/salt/blob/v3000.2_docs/doc/topics/releases/3000.2.rst
Web page

Support Content Notification - Support Portal - Broadcom support portal

http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2020-0009.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2020-11651(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntusalt-syndic (0.17.5+ds-1ubuntu0.1~esm2) @ trusty2026-11-13ubuntu
ubuntusalt-syndic (2015.8.8+ds-1ubuntu0.1) @ xenial2026-11-13ubuntu
pipsalt @ 2019.2.4 (fixes < 2019.2.4)—ghsa
pipsalt @ 3000.2 (fixes >= 3000, < 3000.2)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(19 across 19 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 2019.2.4-r0: fixed in 2019.2.4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 2019.2.4-r0: fixed in 2019.2.4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 3000.2-r0: fixed in 3000.2-r0
—
Alpine:v3.13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 3000.2-r0: fixed in 3000.2-r0
—
Alpine:v3.14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 3000.2-r0: fixed in 3000.2-r0
—
Alpine:v3.15(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 3000.2-r0: fixed in 3000.2-r0
—
Alpine:v3.16(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 3000.2-r0: fixed in 3000.2-r0
—
Alpine:v3.17(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 3000.2-r0: fixed in 3000.2-r0
—
Alpine:v3.18(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 3000.2-r0: fixed in 3000.2-r0
—
Alpine:v3.19(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 3000.2-r0: fixed in 3000.2-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 3000.2-r0: fixed in 3000.2-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 3000.2-r0: fixed in 3000.2-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 3000.2-r0: fixed in 3000.2-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 3000.2-r0: fixed in 3000.2-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt—
  • 3000 up to 3000.2-r0: fixed in 3000.2-r0
—
Debian:10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt2018.3.4+dfsg1-6
  • every version up to 2018.3.4+dfsg1-6+deb10u1: fixed in 2018.3.4+dfsg1-6+deb10u1
—
Debian:8(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt2014.1.13+ds-3
  • every version up to 2014.1.13+ds-3+deb8u1: fixed in 2014.1.13+ds-3+deb8u1
—
Debian:9(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt2016.11.2+ds-1, 2016.11.2+ds-1+deb9u1, 2016.11.2+ds-1+deb9u2, 2016.11.2+ds-1+deb9u3
  • every version up to 2016.11.2+ds-1+deb9u3: fixed in 2016.11.2+ds-1+deb9u3
  • every version up to 2016.11.2+ds-1+deb9u4: fixed in 2016.11.2+ds-1+deb9u4
—
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
salt0.10.0 ... 3000.1 (160 versions)
  • every version up to 2019.2.4: fixed in 2019.2.4
  • 3000 up to 3000.2: fixed in 3000.2
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(2)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 832 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 732 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 18:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 18:45 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-13 18:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjhf-vpx3-33r3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-12 17:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 17:26 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-12 17:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjhf-vpx3-33r3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-12 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-11-11 16:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-11 16:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjhf-vpx3-33r3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-11-10 14:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-10 14:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjhf-vpx3-33r3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-09 13:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-09 13:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjhf-vpx3-33r3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-11-08 12:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-08 12:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjhf-vpx3-33r3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-11-07 10:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-07 10:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjhf-vpx3-33r3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-11-06 09:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-06 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjhf-vpx3-33r3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-11-05 08:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-05 08:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjhf-vpx3-33r3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-11-04 06:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-04 06:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjhf-vpx3-33r3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-11-03 08:25 UTCOSV refresh
  25. 2026-11-03 05:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-03 05:32 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-03 05:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjhf-vpx3-33r3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-02 04:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-02 04:13 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-02 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjhf-vpx3-33r3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-01 08:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjhf-vpx3-33r3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-01 08:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-01 02:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-01 02:51 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-31 01:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-10-31 01:32 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-30 00:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-28 22:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-28 22:56 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-27 21:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-27 21:38 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-26 20:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-26 20:20 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-25 19:01 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-25 18:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-10-24 17:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-24 17:43 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  25. 2026-10-23 16:25 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-22 21:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-22 21:46 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-21 20:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-21 20:26 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-20 19:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-20 19:08 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-19 17:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-18 16:21 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-18 09:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-17 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  37. 2026-10-17 15:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-17 15:02 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-16 13:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  41. 2026-10-15 12:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  43. 2026-10-14 11:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-14 11:04 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-13 09:45 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-12 19:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-12 08:26 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-12 00:40 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-11 20:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-11 20:49 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-11 16:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-11 13:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-11 13:04 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-11 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-11 05:19 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-11 01:28 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-10 21:36 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-10 17:44 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-10 13:53 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-10 10:01 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-10 06:09 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-10 02:18 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-09 18:36 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-09 10:51 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-09 06:59 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-09 03:07 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-08 23:15 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-08 19:24 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-08 15:32 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-08 11:41 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-08 03:58 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-08 00:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-08 00:06 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-07 23:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 97% · 99th percentile
  75. 2026-10-07 20:15 UTCVendor advisory

Publicly available exploits

(13 references, 10 shown)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (2 Metasploit modules, 1 Exploit-DB entry, 9 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 GitHub checker repository. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Metasploitauxiliary/gather/saltstack_salt_root_key✓ verified
    Published May 12, 2020

    SaltStack Salt Master Server Root Key Disclosure

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/linux/misc/saltstack_salt_unauth_rce✓ verified
    Published May 12, 2020

    SaltStack Salt Master/Minion Unauthenticated RCE

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCappcheck-ng/salt-rce-scanner-CVE-2020-11651-CVE-2020-11652
    Published Nov 30, 2020

    Scanning tool to test for SaltStack vulnerabilities CVE-2020-11651 & CVE-2020-11652.

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoClovelyjuice/cve-2020-11651-exp-plus
    Published May 7, 2020
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCssrsec/CVE-2020-11651-CVE-2020-11652-EXP
    Published May 7, 2020

    CVE-2020-11651&&CVE-2020-11652 EXP

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-48421
    Published May 5, 2020

    Saltstack 3000.1 - Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoC0xc0d/CVE-2020-11651
    Published May 4, 2020

    CVE-2020-11651: Proof of Concept

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCbravery9/SaltStack-Exp
    Published May 4, 2020

    CVE-2020-11651&&CVE-2020-11652 EXP

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCdozernz/cve-2020-11651
    Published May 4, 2020
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCjasperla/CVE-2020-11651-poc
    Published May 4, 2020

    PoC exploit of CVE-2020-11651 and CVE-2020-11652

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2020-11651?
CVE-2020-11651 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on April 30, 2020. An issue was discovered in SaltStack Salt before 2019.2.4 and 3000 before 3000.2. The salt-master process ClearFuncs class does not properly validate method calls. This allows a remote user to access some methods without authentication. These methods can be used to retrieve user tokens from the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2020-11651 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2020-11651 was published on April 30, 2020. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 7, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2020-11651 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2020-11651 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on November 3, 2021, affecting SaltStack Salt. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-11651?
CVE-2020-11651 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
Which products are affected by CVE-2020-11651?
CVE-2020-11651 affects SaltStack Salt. The affected packages EchelonGraph has on record, with version ranges, are listed in the Affected Packages section of this page.
How do I remediate CVE-2020-11651?
A fix for CVE-2020-11651 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2020-11651 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2020-11651

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-11651?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.