CVE-2020-0902

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 2.9% (87th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2020-2370 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 2.9%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Service Fabric File Store Service under certain conditions, aka 'Service Fabric Elevation of Privilege'.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
45
EG Risk 45/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation2.9% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
2.9%
EPSS %ILE
87th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
2.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

March 12, 2020

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Oct 4, 2026
Patch available. Sources: microsoft.
MicrosoftMentions a patch (unverified)

Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center

https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-0902

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2020-0902(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 77× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 269 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 169 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 19:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 19:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw · GitHub severity MODERATE
  4. 2026-11-12 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  5. 2026-11-11 19:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-11 19:30 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-11 19:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw · GitHub severity MODERATE
  8. 2026-11-11 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  9. 2026-11-10 19:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-10 19:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw · GitHub severity MODERATE
  11. 2026-11-10 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  12. 2026-11-09 18:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-09 18:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw · GitHub severity MODERATE
  14. 2026-11-09 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  15. 2026-11-08 18:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-08 18:44 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-11-08 18:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw · GitHub severity MODERATE
  18. 2026-11-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  19. 2026-11-07 18:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-07 18:31 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-11-07 18:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw · GitHub severity MODERATE
  22. 2026-11-07 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  23. 2026-11-06 18:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-06 18:18 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-11-06 18:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw · GitHub severity MODERATE
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-06 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  2. 2026-11-05 18:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-05 18:05 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-05 18:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw · GitHub severity MODERATE
  5. 2026-11-05 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  6. 2026-11-04 17:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-04 17:51 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-04 17:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw · GitHub severity MODERATE
  9. 2026-11-04 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  10. 2026-11-03 17:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-03 17:38 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-03 17:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw · GitHub severity MODERATE
  13. 2026-11-03 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  14. 2026-11-02 17:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-02 17:25 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-02 17:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw · GitHub severity MODERATE
  17. 2026-11-02 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  18. 2026-11-01 17:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-01 17:11 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-01 17:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw · GitHub severity MODERATE
  21. 2026-10-31 16:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-31 16:58 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-31 16:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw
  24. 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  25. 2026-10-30 16:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-30 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-30 16:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw
  28. 2026-10-30 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  29. 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  30. 2026-10-29 16:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-29 16:23 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-29 16:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw
  33. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 87th percentile
  34. 2026-10-28 16:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-28 16:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw
  36. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 86th percentile
  37. 2026-10-27 15:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-27 15:54 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-27 15:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw
  40. 2026-10-26 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 86th percentile
  41. 2026-10-26 15:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-26 15:37 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-26 15:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw
  44. 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 86th percentile
  45. 2026-10-25 15:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-25 15:14 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-25 15:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw
  48. 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 86th percentile
  49. 2026-10-24 15:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-24 15:01 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-24 15:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw
  52. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 86th percentile
  53. 2026-10-23 14:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-23 14:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw
  55. 2026-10-22 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 86th percentile
  56. 2026-10-22 14:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-22 14:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw
  58. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 86th percentile
  59. 2026-10-21 14:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-21 14:15 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-21 14:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw
  62. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 86th percentile
  63. 2026-10-20 13:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-20 13:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw
  65. 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 86th percentile
  66. 2026-10-19 12:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-19 12:55 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-19 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw
  69. 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 86th percentile
  70. 2026-10-18 11:38 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-18 11:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw
  72. 2026-10-18 09:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-17 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.9% · 86th percentile
  74. 2026-10-17 10:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-17 10:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c5m9-gqgq-pqxw

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2020-0902?
CVE-2020-0902 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 12, 2020. An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Service Fabric File Store Service under certain conditions, aka 'Service Fabric Elevation of Privilege'.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2020-0902 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2020-0902 was published on March 12, 2020. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2020-0902 actively exploited?
CVE-2020-0902 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.9% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (87th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-0902?
CVE-2020-0902 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2020-0902?
A fix for CVE-2020-0902 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2020-0902 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2020-0902

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-0902?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.