CVE-2020-0601

CRITICALNVD 8.19.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-11-03), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.1 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.1 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Exploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2020-2099 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2022-0535 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 89%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A spoofing vulnerability exists in the way Windows CryptoAPI (Crypt32.dll) validates Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) certificates.An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using a spoofed code-signing certificate to sign a malicious executable, making it appear the file was from a trusted, legitimate source, aka 'Windows CryptoAPI Spoofing Vulnerability'.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
76
EG Risk 76/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity81% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
EPSS PROB
89%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.1 HIGH.

EG Severity
8.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
89% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/ed-20-02-mitigate-windows-vulnerabilities-january-2020-patch-tuesday · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-0601

Published

January 14, 2020

Last Modified

December 18, 2025

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Nov 10, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available. Sources: cisa, microsoft.
CISA🔴 Active Exploitation

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2020-0601
Microsoft

Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center

https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-0601

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2020-0601(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(15 across 15 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • every version up to 1.3.3-r0: fixed in 1.3.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • every version up to 1.3.3-r0: fixed in 1.3.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • every version up to 1.3.3-r0: fixed in 1.3.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • every version up to 1.3.3-r0: fixed in 1.3.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.15(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • every version up to 1.3.3-r0: fixed in 1.3.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.16(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • every version up to 1.3.3-r0: fixed in 1.3.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.17(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • every version up to 1.3.3-r0: fixed in 1.3.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.18(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • every version up to 1.3.3-r0: fixed in 1.3.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.19(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • every version up to 1.3.3-r0: fixed in 1.3.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • every version up to 1.3.3-r0: fixed in 1.3.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • every version up to 1.3.3-r0: fixed in 1.3.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • every version up to 1.3.3-r0: fixed in 1.3.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • every version up to 1.3.3-r0: fixed in 1.3.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • every version up to 1.3.3-r0: fixed in 1.3.3-r0
—
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
stdlib—
  • every version up to 1.12.16: fixed in 1.12.16
  • 1.13.0-0 up to 1.13.7: fixed in 1.13.7
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 62× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,711 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,611 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 09:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 09:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  3. 2026-11-12 10:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-12 10:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  5. 2026-11-11 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-11-11 10:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-11 10:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  8. 2026-11-10 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-11-10 10:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-10 10:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  11. 2026-11-09 10:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-09 10:53 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-09 10:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  14. 2026-11-08 11:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-08 11:09 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-08 11:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  17. 2026-11-07 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-11-07 11:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-07 11:25 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-07 11:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  21. 2026-11-06 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-11-06 11:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-06 11:41 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-06 11:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  25. 2026-11-05 11:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 11:57 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-05 11:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  3. 2026-11-04 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-11-04 12:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-04 12:13 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-04 12:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  7. 2026-11-03 12:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-03 12:27 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-11-03 12:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  10. 2026-11-03 07:25 UTCOSV refresh
  11. 2026-11-02 12:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-02 12:43 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-02 12:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  14. 2026-11-01 12:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-01 12:58 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-01 12:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  17. 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-10-31 13:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-31 13:14 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-31 13:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  21. 2026-10-30 13:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-30 13:29 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-30 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  24. 2026-10-29 13:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-29 13:43 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-29 13:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  27. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  28. 2026-10-28 13:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-28 13:58 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-28 13:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  31. 2026-10-27 14:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-27 14:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  33. 2026-10-26 14:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-26 14:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  35. 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  36. 2026-10-25 14:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-25 14:43 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-25 14:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  39. 2026-10-24 14:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-24 14:58 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-24 14:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  42. 2026-10-23 15:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-23 15:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  44. 2026-10-22 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  45. 2026-10-22 15:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-22 15:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  47. 2026-10-21 15:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-21 15:44 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-21 15:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  50. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  51. 2026-10-20 15:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-20 15:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  53. 2026-10-19 16:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-19 16:12 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-19 16:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  56. 2026-10-18 16:26 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-18 16:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  58. 2026-10-18 07:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-18 07:37 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-18 07:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  61. 2026-10-17 07:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-17 07:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  63. 2026-10-16 08:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-16 08:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  65. 2026-10-15 08:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-15 08:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  67. 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  68. 2026-10-14 08:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-14 08:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  70. 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  71. 2026-10-13 08:53 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-13 08:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-82jc-cv6x-r223 · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  73. 2026-10-12 19:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-10-12 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  75. 2026-10-12 09:09 UTCVendor advisory

Publicly available exploits

(11 references, 10 shown)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry, 9 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 GitHub checker repository. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCeastmountyxz/CVE-2020-0601-EXP
    Published Feb 17, 2020

    这资源是作者复现微软签字证书漏洞CVE-2020-0601,结合相关资源及文章实现。推荐大家结合作者博客,理解ECC算法、Windows验证机制,并尝试自己复现可执行文件签名证书和HTTPS劫持的例子。作为网络安全初学者,自己确实很菜,但希望坚持下去,加油!

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCioncodes/Curveball
    Published Jan 28, 2020

    PoC for CVE-2020-0601 - CryptoAPI exploit

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCgentilkiwi/curveball
    Published Jan 20, 2020

    CVE-2020-0601 #curveball - Alternative Key Calculator

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCIIICTECH/-CVE-2020-0601-ECC---EXPLOIT
    Published Jan 19, 2020

    CurveBall (CVE-2020-0601) - PoC CVE-2020-0601, or commonly referred to as CurveBall, is a vulnerability in which the signature of certificates using elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) is not correctly verified. Attackers can supply hand-rolled generators, bypassing validation, antivirus & all non-protections.

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCRrUZi/Awesome-CVE-2020-0601
    Published Jan 16, 2020

    😂An awesome curated list of repos for CVE-2020-0601.

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCsaleemrashid/badecparams
    Published Jan 16, 2020

    Proof of Concept for CVE-2020-0601

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-47933
    Published Jan 15, 2020

    Microsoft Windows - CryptoAPI (Crypt32.dll) Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Spoof Code-Signing Certificate

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub checker0xxon/cve-2020-0601
    Published Jan 15, 2020

    Zeek package to detect CVE-2020-0601

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoC0xxon/cve-2020-0601-plugin
    Published Jan 15, 2020

    Zeek package that uses OpenSSL to detect CVE-2020-0601 exploit attempts

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCkudelskisecurity/chainoffools
    Published Jan 15, 2020

    A PoC for CVE-2020-0601

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2020-0601?
CVE-2020-0601 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 14, 2020. A spoofing vulnerability exists in the way Windows CryptoAPI (Crypt32.dll) validates Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) certificates.An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using a spoofed code-signing certificate to sign a malicious executable, making it appear the file was from a trusted,…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2020-0601 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2020-0601 was published on January 14, 2020. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of December 18, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2020-0601 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2020-0601 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on November 3, 2021, affecting Microsoft Windows. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-0601?
CVE-2020-0601 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.1 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2020-0601?
CVE-2020-0601 affects Microsoft Windows. The affected packages EchelonGraph has on record, with version ranges, are listed in the Affected Packages section of this page.
How do I remediate CVE-2020-0601?
A fix for CVE-2020-0601 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2020-0601 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2020-0601

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-0601?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.