CVE-2019-17267

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2020-06-15. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2020-0483 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-f3j5-rmmp-3fc5 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 4.6%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.10. It is related to net.sf.ehcache.hibernate.EhcacheJtaTransactionManagerLookup.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
46
EG Risk 46/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation4.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
4.6%
EPSS %ILE
91st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
4.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 7, 2019

Last Modified

October 7, 2026

Advisory Details (10)

Auto-updated Nov 8, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Web page

Block one more gadget type (ehcache, CVE-2019-17267) · Issue #2460 · FasterXML/jackson-databind · GitHub

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/2460
Web page

Comparing jackson-databind-2.9.9.3...jackson-databind-2.9.10 · FasterXML/jackson-databind · GitHub

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/compare/jackson-databind-2.9.9.3...jackson-databind-2.9.10
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0445
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0164
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0161
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0160
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0159
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3200

Patch Availability(9)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulibjackson2-databind-java-doc (2.4.2-3ubuntu0.1~esm2) @ xenial2026-11-12ubuntu
redhatjackson-databind2020-07-28redhat
redhatpatch2020-05-18redhat
redhateap7-wildfly-transaction-client-0:1.1.8-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el6eap2020-01-21redhat
redhateap7-wildfly-transaction-client-0:1.1.8-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el8eap2020-01-21redhat
redhateap7-wildfly-transaction-client-0:1.1.8-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el7eap2020-01-21redhat
redhatpatch2019-11-18redhat
mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.8.11.5 (fixes < 2.8.11.5)—ghsa
mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.9.10 (fixes >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.10.0-1: fixed in 2.10.0-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.10.0-1: fixed in 2.10.0-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.10.0-1: fixed in 2.10.0-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.10.0-1: fixed in 2.10.0-1
—
Debian:8(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind2.4.2-2 ... 2.4.2-2+deb8u9 (10 versions)
  • every version up to 2.4.2-2+deb8u10: fixed in 2.4.2-2+deb8u10
—
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.0.0 ... 2.8.9 (107 versions)
  • 2.9.0 up to 2.9.10: fixed in 2.9.10
  • every version up to 2.8.11.5: fixed in 2.8.11.5
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(4)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 74× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 275 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 175 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 08:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 08:14 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-13 08:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f3j5-rmmp-3fc5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 08:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 08:13 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-12 08:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f3j5-rmmp-3fc5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-11 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  9. 2026-11-11 08:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-11 08:13 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-11 08:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f3j5-rmmp-3fc5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-10 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  13. 2026-11-10 08:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-10 08:12 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-10 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f3j5-rmmp-3fc5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-11-09 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  17. 2026-11-09 08:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-09 08:12 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-09 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f3j5-rmmp-3fc5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-11-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  21. 2026-11-08 08:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-08 08:12 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-08 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f3j5-rmmp-3fc5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-11-07 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  25. 2026-11-07 08:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-07 08:12 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-07 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f3j5-rmmp-3fc5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-06 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  4. 2026-11-06 08:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-06 08:12 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-06 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f3j5-rmmp-3fc5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-05 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  8. 2026-11-05 08:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-05 08:13 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-05 08:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f3j5-rmmp-3fc5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-11-04 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 08:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-04 08:13 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-04 08:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f3j5-rmmp-3fc5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-03 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  16. 2026-11-03 08:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-03 08:09 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-03 08:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f3j5-rmmp-3fc5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-11-03 03:55 UTCOSV refresh
  20. 2026-11-02 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  21. 2026-11-02 08:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-02 08:09 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-02 08:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f3j5-rmmp-3fc5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-11-01 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  25. 2026-11-01 08:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-11-01 08:07 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-11-01 08:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f3j5-rmmp-3fc5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  28. 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  29. 2026-10-31 08:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-31 08:06 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-30 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  32. 2026-10-30 08:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-30 08:04 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  35. 2026-10-29 08:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-29 08:05 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  38. 2026-10-28 08:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-28 08:04 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  41. 2026-10-27 08:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-27 08:00 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-26 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  44. 2026-10-26 05:37 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-25 19:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  47. 2026-10-25 05:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-25 05:37 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  50. 2026-10-24 05:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-24 05:36 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  53. 2026-10-23 05:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-23 05:37 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-22 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  56. 2026-10-22 05:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-22 05:37 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  59. 2026-10-21 05:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-21 05:35 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  62. 2026-10-20 05:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-20 05:34 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  65. 2026-10-19 05:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-19 05:35 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  68. 2026-10-18 05:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-18 05:32 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-17 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  71. 2026-10-17 05:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-17 05:30 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-16 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  74. 2026-10-16 05:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-16 05:26 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2019-17267?
CVE-2019-17267 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 7, 2019. A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.10. It is related to net.sf.ehcache.hibernate.EhcacheJtaTransactionManagerLookup.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2019-17267 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2019-17267 was published on October 7, 2019. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 7, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2019-17267 actively exploited?
CVE-2019-17267 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 4.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (91st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-17267?
CVE-2019-17267 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2019-17267?
A fix for CVE-2019-17267 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2019-17267 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2019-17267

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-17267?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.