CVE-2019-14832

HIGHNVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2022-05-24. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2022-3212 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-8prc-58j4-m55q (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A flaw was found in the Keycloak REST API before version 8.0.0 where it would permit user access from a realm the user was not configured. An authenticated attacker with knowledge of a user id could use this flaw to access unauthorized information or to carry out further attacks.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
34
EG Risk 34/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
45th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-10). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 15, 2019

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Nov 11, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

1749487 – (CVE-2019-14832) CVE-2019-14832 keycloak: cross-realm user access auth bypass

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-14832

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2019-14832(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(7)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkeycloak2020-06-04redhat
redhatpatch2020-05-18redhat
redhatpatch2019-10-14redhat
redhatrh-sso7-keycloak-0:4.8.13-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el6sso2019-10-14redhat
redhatrh-sso7-libunix-dbus-java-0:0.8.0-2.el7sso2019-10-14redhat
redhatrh-sso7-keycloak-0:4.8.13-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el8sso2019-10-14redhat
mavenorg.keycloak:keycloak-model-infinispan @ 7.0.1 (fixes < 7.0.1)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.keycloak:keycloak-model-infinispan1.9.0.CR1 ... 7.0.0 (61 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.1: fixed in 7.0.1
—
org.keycloak:keycloak-model-jpa1.0-alpha-1 ... 7.0.0 (103 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.1: fixed in 7.0.1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 216 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 116 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 07:56 UTCOSV refresh
  4. 2026-11-11 05:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 05:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8prc-58j4-m55q · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  6. 2026-11-10 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  7. 2026-11-09 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  8. 2026-11-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  9. 2026-11-07 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  10. 2026-11-06 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  11. 2026-11-05 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  13. 2026-11-04 12:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-04 12:55 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-04 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8prc-58j4-m55q · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  16. 2026-11-03 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  17. 2026-11-02 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  18. 2026-11-01 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  19. 2026-11-01 08:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8prc-58j4-m55q · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  20. 2026-11-01 08:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  22. 2026-10-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  23. 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  24. 2026-10-28 19:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-28 19:51 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  2. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  3. 2026-10-26 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 19:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  6. 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  7. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  8. 2026-10-22 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  9. 2026-10-21 18:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-10-21 18:21 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  12. 2026-10-20 22:55 UTCOSV refresh
  13. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  14. 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  15. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  16. 2026-10-18 09:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-17 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  18. 2026-10-16 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  19. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  20. 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  21. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-12 20:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-12 00:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  26. 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  27. 2026-10-09 20:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  28. 2026-10-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  29. 2026-10-07 23:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  30. 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  31. 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  32. 2026-10-04 23:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  33. 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  34. 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  35. 2026-09-30 10:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-09-28 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  37. 2026-09-27 17:43 UTCOSV refresh
  38. 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  39. 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  40. 2026-09-26 00:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  41. 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  42. 2026-09-23 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  43. 2026-09-21 20:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  44. 2026-09-20 20:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  45. 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  46. 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  47. 2026-09-16 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  48. 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  49. 2026-09-13 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  50. 2026-09-12 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  51. 2026-09-11 14:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  52. 2026-09-08 21:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  53. 2026-09-08 02:45 UTCOSV refresh
  54. 2026-09-07 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  55. 2026-09-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  56. 2026-09-05 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  57. 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  58. 2026-09-04 05:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  59. 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  60. 2026-09-01 03:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  61. 2026-08-30 19:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  62. 2026-08-30 01:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  63. 2026-08-28 21:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  64. 2026-08-27 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  65. 2026-08-26 14:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  66. 2026-08-25 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  67. 2026-08-21 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  68. 2026-08-21 13:14 UTCOSV refresh
  69. 2026-08-20 22:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  70. 2026-08-19 17:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  71. 2026-08-18 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  72. 2026-08-17 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  73. 2026-08-16 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  74. 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  75. 2026-08-15 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2019-14832?
CVE-2019-14832 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 15, 2019. A flaw was found in the Keycloak REST API before version 8.0.0 where it would permit user access from a realm the user was not configured. An authenticated attacker with knowledge of a user id could use this flaw to access unauthorized information or to carry out further attacks.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2019-14832 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2019-14832 was published on October 15, 2019. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2019-14832 actively exploited?
CVE-2019-14832 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (45th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-14832?
CVE-2019-14832 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2019-14832?
A fix for CVE-2019-14832 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2019-14832 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2019-14832

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-14832?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.