CVE-2019-1003029

CRITICALNVD 9.99.9
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.9 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-04-25), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.9 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Exploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2022-5866 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-xvxq-hq48-xphm (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 74%CVSS: 9.9Exploit: MetasploitExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.53 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/scriptsecurity/sandbox/groovy/GroovySandbox.java, src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/scriptsecurity/sandbox/groovy/SecureGroovyScript.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM.

CVSS v3
9.9
EG Score
9.9CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
85
EG Risk 85/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity99% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
EPSS PROB
74%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.9 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
74% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-1003029

Published

March 8, 2019

Last Modified

October 24, 2025

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Nov 9, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available. Sources: cisa, redhat.
CISA🔴 Active Exploitation

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2019-1003029
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0739
Web page

PSIRT.COM — Product Security Incident Response Team

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107476

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2019-1003029(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatjenkins-2-plugins-0:3.11.1552336312-1.el72019-04-10redhat
mavenorg.jenkins-ci.plugins:script-security @ 1.54 (fixes < 1.54)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.jenkins-ci.plugins:script-security1.0 ... 1.9 (63 versions)
  • every version up to 1.54: fixed in 1.54
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 54× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,017 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 917 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 23:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 23:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvxq-hq48-xphm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  3. 2026-11-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 20:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 20:58 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-11 20:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvxq-hq48-xphm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  7. 2026-11-11 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-11-10 18:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-10 18:43 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-10 18:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvxq-hq48-xphm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  11. 2026-11-10 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-11-09 16:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-09 16:29 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-09 16:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvxq-hq48-xphm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  15. 2026-11-08 14:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-08 14:14 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-11-08 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvxq-hq48-xphm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  18. 2026-11-07 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  19. 2026-11-07 11:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-07 11:58 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-11-07 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvxq-hq48-xphm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  22. 2026-11-06 09:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-06 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-06 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvxq-hq48-xphm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  25. 2026-11-05 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 07:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-05 07:29 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-05 07:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvxq-hq48-xphm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  4. 2026-11-04 05:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-04 05:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvxq-hq48-xphm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  6. 2026-11-03 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  7. 2026-11-03 02:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-03 02:59 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-11-03 02:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvxq-hq48-xphm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  10. 2026-11-03 00:55 UTCOSV refresh
  11. 2026-11-02 00:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-02 00:44 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-02 00:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvxq-hq48-xphm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  14. 2026-11-01 08:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvxq-hq48-xphm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  15. 2026-11-01 08:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-31 22:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-31 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  19. 2026-10-30 20:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-30 20:15 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-10-29 18:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-29 18:00 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  25. 2026-10-28 15:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-28 15:44 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  28. 2026-10-27 13:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-27 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-26 11:13 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-25 19:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  33. 2026-10-25 08:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-25 08:59 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-24 06:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-24 06:44 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  38. 2026-10-23 04:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-23 04:30 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-22 02:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-22 02:15 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  43. 2026-10-20 23:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-20 23:58 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-19 21:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-19 21:42 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  48. 2026-10-18 19:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-18 19:26 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  51. 2026-10-18 09:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-17 17:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-17 17:10 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-16 14:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-16 14:53 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  57. 2026-10-15 12:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-15 12:38 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  60. 2026-10-14 10:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-14 10:20 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  63. 2026-10-13 08:05 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-12 20:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-12 05:51 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-12 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-11 21:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-10-11 21:09 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  72. 2026-10-11 12:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-11 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-11 08:07 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-11 03:46 UTCVendor advisory

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Metasploitexploit/multi/http/jenkins_metaprogramming✓ verified
    Published Mar 18, 2019

    Jenkins ACL Bypass and Metaprogramming RCE

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2019-1003029?
CVE-2019-1003029 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 8, 2019. A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.53 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/scriptsecurity/sandbox/groovy/GroovySandbox.java, src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/scriptsecurity/sandbox/groovy/SecureGroovyScript.java that allows attackers with…
When was CVE-2019-1003029 made public?
CVE-2019-1003029 was made public on March 8, 2019: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Jenkins Project, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on March 8, 2019. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2019-1003029 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2019-1003029 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on April 25, 2022, affecting Jenkins Script Security Plugin. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-1003029?
CVE-2019-1003029 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.9 (NVD).
Which products are affected by CVE-2019-1003029?
CVE-2019-1003029 affects Jenkins Script Security Plugin. The affected packages EchelonGraph has on record, with version ranges, are listed in the Affected Packages section of this page.
How do I remediate CVE-2019-1003029?
A fix for CVE-2019-1003029 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2019-1003029 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2019-1003029

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-1003029?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.