CVE-2018-8021

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2018-11-09. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2018-0137 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2018-74 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 53%
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 53%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Versions of Superset prior to 0.23 used an unsafe load method from the pickle library to deserialize data leading to possible remote code execution. Note Superset 0.23 was released prior to any Superset release under the Apache Software Foundation.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
65
EG Risk 65/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation53% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
53%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
53% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 7, 2018

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Oct 5, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr.
Web page

Apache Superset < 0.23 - Remote Code Execution - Linux webapps Exploit

https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45933/
GitHub pull request Patch Available

Use json for imports and exports, not pickle

Patch available: apache/incubator-superset superset-helm-chart-0.15.2 (PR #4243 merged 2018-01-24)

https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/pull/4243

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2018-8021(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
pipsuperset @ 0.23 (fixes < 0.23)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
superset0.13.2 ... 0.22.1 (32 versions)
  • every version up to 0.23: fixed in 0.23
  • every version up to 0.23.0: fixed in 0.23.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 207 rows on record for this CVE, as 99 entries (1 repeat merged).

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 107 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 08:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 09:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 09:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-11 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 99th percentile
  7. 2026-11-11 10:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-11 10:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-10 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  10. 2026-11-10 11:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-10 11:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-09 12:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-09 12:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-11-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  15. 2026-11-08 13:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-08 13:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-07 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  18. 2026-11-07 14:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-07 14:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-11-06 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  21. 2026-11-06 15:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-11-05 16:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-05 16:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-11-05 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  25. 2026-11-04 17:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-11-04 17:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-11-04 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  3. 2026-11-03 18:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-03 18:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-11-03 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  6. 2026-11-03 00:25 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-11-02 19:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-02 19:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-01 20:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-01 20:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-11-01 08:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vxp9-wv2f-wqmw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-01 08:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-31 21:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  15. 2026-10-30 23:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  17. 2026-10-30 00:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  19. 2026-10-29 01:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  21. 2026-10-28 02:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  23. 2026-10-27 03:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-25 19:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  26. 2026-10-25 01:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  28. 2026-10-24 02:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  30. 2026-10-23 03:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-22 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  32. 2026-10-22 04:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  34. 2026-10-21 05:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  36. 2026-10-20 06:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  38. 2026-10-19 07:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  40. 2026-10-18 08:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  42. 2026-10-17 09:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-16 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  44. 2026-10-16 10:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  46. 2026-10-15 10:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  48. 2026-10-14 06:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  50. 2026-10-12 20:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  52. 2026-10-12 00:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  54. 2026-10-09 20:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  55. 2026-10-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  56. 2026-10-07 23:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  57. 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  58. 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  59. 2026-10-01 19:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  60. 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  61. 2026-09-30 10:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-09-28 17:12 UTCOSV refresh
  63. 2026-09-28 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  64. 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  65. 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  66. 2026-09-23 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  67. 2026-09-21 20:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
  68. 2026-09-19 15:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  69. 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  70. 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  71. 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  72. 2026-09-11 14:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  73. 2026-09-11 09:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  74. 2026-09-08 21:34 UTCOSV refresh

Publicly available exploits

(2 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry, 1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-45933
    Published Dec 3, 2018

    Apache Superset < 0.23 - Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCr3dxpl0it/Apache-Superset-Remote-Code-Execution-PoC-CVE-2018-8021
    Published Dec 2, 2018

    CVE-2018-8021 Proof-Of-Concept and Exploit

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2018-8021?
CVE-2018-8021 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 7, 2018. Versions of Superset prior to 0.23 used an unsafe load method from the pickle library to deserialize data leading to possible remote code execution. Note Superset 0.23 was released prior to any Superset release under the Apache Software Foundation.
When was CVE-2018-8021 made public?
CVE-2018-8021 was made public on November 6, 2018: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Apache Software Foundation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on November 7, 2018. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2018-8021 actively exploited?
CVE-2018-8021 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 53% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2018-8021?
CVE-2018-8021 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2018-8021?
A fix for CVE-2018-8021 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2018-8021 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2018-8021

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2018-8021?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.