CVE-2018-19360

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2019-01-04. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2019-0186 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-f9hv-mg5h-xcw9 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 11%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.8 might allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to block the axis2-transport-jms class from polymorphic deserialization.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
11%
EPSS %ILE
95th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
11% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

January 2, 2019

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Advisory Details (18)

Auto-updated Nov 7, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2858
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2804
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1823
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1822
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1797
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1782
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0877
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0782
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0959
Web page

CVE-2018-19360 - PSIRT.COM

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107985
GitHub commit

commit 42912cac4753 (FasterXML/jackson-databind)

Fix landed in FasterXML/jackson-databind commit 42912cac4753 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/42912cac4753f3f718ece875e4d486f8264c2f2b
Web page

[TINKERPOP-2121] Bump Jackson Databind 2.9.8 - ASF Jira

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2121
Web page

Jackson Release 2.9.8 · FasterXML/jackson Wiki · GitHub

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.9.8
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 1703-1] jackson-databind security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00005.html
Web page

Block more classes from polymorphic deserialization (CVE-2018-19360, CVE-2018-19361, CVE-2018-19362) · Issue #2186 · FasterXML/jackson-databind · GitHub

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/2186

Patch Availability(11)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulibjackson2-databind-java-doc (2.4.2-3ubuntu0.1~esm2) @ xenial2026-11-12ubuntu
redhatopenshift-logging/elasticsearch6-rhel8:v5.0.3-12021-05-06redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-logging-elasticsearch6:v4.6.0-202104161407.p02021-04-27redhat
redhatjackson-databind2020-06-15redhat
redhatopenshift3/ose-logging-elasticsearch5:v3.11.153-22019-10-18redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-logging-elasticsearch5:v4.1.18-2019092019152019-09-27redhat
redhatpatch2019-04-24redhat
redhatrh-maven35-jackson-databind-0:2.7.6-2.5.el72019-04-17redhat
mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.9.8 (fixes >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.8)—ghsa
mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.8.11.3 (fixes >= 2.8.0, <= 2.8.11.2)—ghsa
mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.7.9.5 (fixes >= 2.7.0, <= 2.7.9.4)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(7 across 7 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.9.8-1: fixed in 2.9.8-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.9.8-1: fixed in 2.9.8-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.9.8-1: fixed in 2.9.8-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.9.8-1: fixed in 2.9.8-1
—
Debian:8(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind2.4.2-2, 2.4.2-2+deb8u1, 2.4.2-2+deb8u2, 2.4.2-2+deb8u3, 2.4.2-2+deb8u4
  • every version up to 2.4.2-2+deb8u5: fixed in 2.4.2-2+deb8u5
—
Debian:9(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind2.8.6-1, 2.8.6-1+deb9u1, 2.8.6-1+deb9u2, 2.8.6-1+deb9u3, 2.8.6-1+deb9u4
  • every version up to 2.8.6-1+deb9u5: fixed in 2.8.6-1+deb9u5
—
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.7.0 ... 2.7.9.4 (15 versions)
  • 2.9.0 up to 2.9.8: fixed in 2.9.8
  • 2.8.0 up to 2.8.11.3: fixed in 2.8.11.3
  • 2.7.0 up to 2.7.9.5: fixed in 2.7.9.5
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(10)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 69× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 268 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 168 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 03:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 03:02 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-13 03:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f9hv-mg5h-xcw9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 00:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 00:57 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-12 00:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f9hv-mg5h-xcw9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-11 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  9. 2026-11-10 22:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-10 22:52 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-10 22:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f9hv-mg5h-xcw9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-10 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  13. 2026-11-09 20:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-09 20:22 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-09 20:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f9hv-mg5h-xcw9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-11-09 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  17. 2026-11-08 18:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-08 18:18 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-08 18:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f9hv-mg5h-xcw9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-11-08 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  21. 2026-11-07 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  22. 2026-11-07 16:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-07 16:13 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-07 16:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f9hv-mg5h-xcw9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-06 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-06 14:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-06 14:05 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-06 14:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f9hv-mg5h-xcw9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-05 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  5. 2026-11-05 12:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-05 12:00 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-05 12:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f9hv-mg5h-xcw9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-04 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  9. 2026-11-04 09:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-04 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-04 09:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f9hv-mg5h-xcw9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-03 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  13. 2026-11-03 07:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-03 07:51 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-03 07:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f9hv-mg5h-xcw9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-11-02 22:25 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-11-02 05:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-02 05:45 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-02 05:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f9hv-mg5h-xcw9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-11-01 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  21. 2026-11-01 08:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f9hv-mg5h-xcw9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-11-01 08:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-01 03:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-01 03:41 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  26. 2026-10-31 01:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-31 01:36 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  29. 2026-10-29 23:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-29 23:32 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  32. 2026-10-28 21:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-28 21:28 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  35. 2026-10-27 19:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-27 19:20 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  38. 2026-10-26 17:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-26 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  40. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  41. 2026-10-25 14:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-25 14:51 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  44. 2026-10-24 12:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-24 12:45 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  47. 2026-10-23 10:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-23 10:39 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-22 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  50. 2026-10-22 08:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-22 08:32 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  53. 2026-10-21 06:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-21 06:26 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  56. 2026-10-20 04:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-20 04:21 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  59. 2026-10-19 02:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-19 02:14 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-18 10:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-18 00:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-18 00:07 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  65. 2026-10-16 22:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-16 22:01 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-16 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  68. 2026-10-15 18:28 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-15 17:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-15 17:44 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  72. 2026-10-15 11:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-15 11:12 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  75. 2026-10-14 06:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2018-19360?
CVE-2018-19360 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 2, 2019. FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.8 might allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to block the axis2-transport-jms class from polymorphic deserialization.
When was CVE-2018-19360 made public?
CVE-2018-19360 was made public on November 19, 2018: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, MITRE Corporation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on January 2, 2019. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2018-19360 actively exploited?
CVE-2018-19360 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 11% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (95th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2018-19360?
CVE-2018-19360 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2018-19360?
A fix for CVE-2018-19360 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2018-19360 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2018-19360

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2018-19360?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.